SAGE: finding IMBH in the black hole desert

SAGE (SagnAc interferometer for Gravitational wavE) is a project for a space observatory based on multiple 12-U CubeSats in geosynchronous equatorial orbit. The objective is a fast track mission which would fill the observational gap between LISA and ground based observatories. With albeit a lower sensitivity, it would allow early investigation of the nature and event rate of intermediate-mass black hole (IMBH) mergers, constraining our understanding of the universe formation by probing the building up of IMBH up to supermassive black holes (SMBH). Technically, the CubeSats would create a triangular Sagnac interferometer with 140.000 km roundtrip arm length, optimised to be sensitive to gravitational waves at frequencies between 10 mHz and 2 Hz. The nature of the Sagnac measurement makes it almost insensitive to position error, a feature enabling the use of spacecrafts in ballistic trajectories instead of perfect free fall. The light source and recombination units of the interferometer are based on compact fibered technologies without bulk optics. A peak sensitivity of 23 pm ()−1 is expected at 1 Hz assuming a 200 mW internal laser source and 10-centimeter diameter apertures. Because of the absence of a test mass, the main limitation would come from the non-gravitational forces applied on the spacecrafts. However, conditionally upon our ability to partially post-process the effect of solar wind and solar pressure, SAGE would allow detection of gravitational waves with strains as low as a few 10−19 within the 0.1 to 1 Hz range. Averaged over the entire sky, and including the antenna gain of the Sagnac interferometer, the SAGE observatory would sense equal mass black hole mergers in the 104 to 106 solar masses range up to a luminosity distance of 800 Mpc. Additionally, coalescence of stellar black holes (10 M) around SMBH (IMBH) forming extreme (intermediate) mass ratio inspirals could be detected within a sphere of radius 200 Mpc.

[1]  N. Cornish,et al.  The construction and use of LISA sensitivity curves , 2018, Classical and Quantum Gravity.

[2]  A. Kellerer,et al.  SAGE: using CubeSats for gravitational wave detection , 2018, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[3]  J. Strader,et al.  A luminous X-ray outburst from an intermediate-mass black hole in an off-centre star cluster , 2018, Nature Astronomy.

[4]  M. Volonteri,et al.  Intermediate-mass black holes in dwarf galaxies out to redshift ∼2.4 in the Chandra COSMOS-Legacy Survey , 2018, 1802.01567.

[5]  B. Kocsis,et al.  Gravitational Waves and Intermediate-mass Black Hole Retention in Globular Clusters , 2017, 1711.00483.

[6]  B. A. Boom,et al.  GW170817: Implications for the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background from Compact Binary Coalescences , 2017, 1710.05837.

[7]  P. Amaro-Seoane Relativistic dynamics and extreme mass ratio inspirals , 2012, Living reviews in relativity.

[8]  A. Sesana,et al.  Post-Newtonian evolution of massive black hole triplets in galactic nuclei - III. A robust lower limit to the nHz stochastic background of gravitational waves , 2017, 1709.06095.

[9]  F. Koliopanos Intermediate Mass Black Holes: A Review , 2017 .

[10]  M. Mezcua,et al.  Observational evidence for intermediate-mass black holes , 2017, 1705.09667.

[11]  Alexander H. Nitz,et al.  Detecting Binary Compact-object Mergers with Gravitational Waves: Understanding and Improving the Sensitivity of the PyCBC Search , 2017, 1705.01513.

[12]  B. A. Boom,et al.  Search for intermediate mass black hole binaries in the first observing run of Advanced LIGO , 2017, 1704.04628.

[13]  N. Cornish,et al.  Galactic binary science with the new LISA design , 2017, 1703.09858.

[14]  G. Auger,et al.  Introduction to the Detection of Gravitational Waves with Ground and Space Based Detectors , 2017 .

[15]  M. Colpi,et al.  Gravitational Wave Sources in the Era of Multi-Band Gravitational Wave Astronomy , 2016, 1610.05309.

[16]  W. Ni Gravitational wave detection in space , 2016, 1610.01148.

[17]  Naoki Seto,et al.  Pre-DECIGO can get the smoking gun to decide the astrophysical or cosmological origin of GW150914-like binary black holes , 2016, 1607.00897.

[18]  Von Welch,et al.  Reproducing GW150914: The First Observation of Gravitational Waves From a Binary Black Hole Merger , 2016, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[19]  B. A. Boom,et al.  ScholarWorks @ UTRGV ScholarWorks @ UTRGV Properties of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914 Properties of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914 , 2016 .

[20]  J. Gair,et al.  Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA: Supermassive black hole binaries , 2015, 1511.05581.

[21]  Matthew West,et al.  The PyCBC search for gravitational waves from compact binary coalescence , 2015, 1508.02357.

[22]  Frank Flechtner,et al.  What Can be Expected from the GRACE-FO Laser Ranging Interferometer for Earth Science Applications? , 2016, Surveys in Geophysics.

[23]  M Tinto,et al.  gLISA: geosynchronous laser interferometer space antenna concepts with off-the-shelf satellites. , 2015, The Review of scientific instruments.

[24]  Wei Gao,et al.  Descope of the ALIA mission , 2014, 1410.7296.

[25]  Massimo Tinto,et al.  Orbit analysis of a geostationary gravitational wave interferometer detector array , 2014 .

[26]  Alexander H. Nitz,et al.  Implementing a search for aligned-spin neutron star - black hole systems with advanced ground based gravitational wave detectors , 2014, 1405.6731.

[27]  Massimo Tinto,et al.  Time-Delay Interferometry , 2003, Living reviews in relativity.

[28]  E. Barausse The evolution of massive black holes and their spins in their galactic hosts , 2012, 1201.5888.

[29]  Michael Boyle,et al.  Inspiral-merger-ringdown multipolar waveforms of nonspinning black-hole binaries using the effective-one-body formalism , 2011, 1106.1021.

[30]  T. Ebisuzaki,et al.  The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna: DECIGO , 2011 .

[31]  Didier Barret,et al.  An intermediate-mass black hole of over 500 solar masses in the galaxy ESO 243-49 , 2009, Nature.

[32]  Alberto Sesana,et al.  The imprint of massive black hole formation models on the LISA data stream , 2007, astro-ph/0701556.

[33]  E. Phinney,et al.  Laser interferometry for the Big Bang Observer , 2006 .

[34]  A. Zentner,et al.  Testing Models of Supermassive Black Hole Seed Formation through Gravity Waves , 2005, astro-ph/0503511.

[35]  R. Jehn,et al.  End-Of Disposal of Geostationary Satellites , 2005 .

[36]  S. J. Jiménez-Reyes,et al.  Variation of the low-degree solar acoustic mode parameters over the solar cycle , 2002 .

[37]  V. Narayanan,et al.  A Survey of z > 5.8 Quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. I. Discovery of Three New Quasars and the Spatial Density of Luminous Quasars at z ∼ 6 , 2001, astro-ph/0108063.

[38]  J. Armstrong,et al.  Time-delay analysis of LISA gravitational data: elimination spacecraft motion effects , 2000 .

[39]  John W. Armstrong,et al.  Cancellation of laser noise in an unequal-arm interferometer detector of gravitational radiation , 1999 .

[40]  Judit M. Pap,et al.  FIRST RESULTS FROM VIRGO, THE EXPERIMENT FOR HELIOSEISMOLOGY AND SOLAR IRRADIANCE MONITORING ON SOHO , 1997 .

[41]  Richard C. Willson,et al.  VIRGO: Experiment for helioseismology and solar irradiance monitoring , 1995 .

[42]  Saul A. Teukolsky,et al.  Perturbations of a rotating black hole. I. Fundamental equations for gravitational, electromagnetic, and neutrino-field perturbations , 1973 .