International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 2010 IT CHALLENGES IN M & A TRANSACTIONS – THE IT CARVE-OUT VIEW ON DIVESTMENTS

Carve-outs belong to the most disruptive events companies – especially IT departments – are subject to. Yet the impact of these events on the IT alignment of the involved business units is largely unknown. This paper utilizes an alignment model to analyze specific IT-related challenges of divesting a strategic business unit (SBU). Hereby it focuses on the functional alignment between business strategy and IT at SBU level as well as on the organizational alignment between corporate and SBU. Based on five in-depth case studies of carve-outs taken place between 2004 and 2008, IT related challenges could be identified due to interdependent SBU information systems, a lack of IT governance, changing strategic scopes and the inability to preserve competencies. Dynamic capabilities were discovered as possible determinants for carve-out success. Carve-out management teams can utilize the analytical framework to make a SBU carveout ready, to guide IT due diligence and to prioritize IT issues.

[1]  KA Thleen,et al.  Building Theories from Case Study , 2007 .

[2]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[3]  Switbert Miczka,et al.  Merger Dynamics – A System Dynamics Analysis of Post-Merger Integration Processes , 2004 .

[4]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[5]  Jerry N. Luftman,et al.  IT-Business Strategic Alignment Maturity: A Case Study , 2005, J. Cases Inf. Technol..

[6]  Michael Holm-Larsen,et al.  ICT Integration in an M&A Process , 2005 .

[7]  A. McGahan,et al.  The choice among acquisitions, alliances, and divestitures , 2005 .

[8]  Ton Spil,et al.  Post-merger IT integration strategies: An IT alignment perspective , 2006, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Nikhil Mehta,et al.  It takes two to tango , 2010, Commun. ACM.

[10]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[11]  Philip Yetton,et al.  Integrating information technology divisions in a bank merger Fit, compatibility and models of change , 1996, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Ravi Madhavan,et al.  Divestiture and Firm Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2010 .

[13]  Randall S. Schuler,et al.  HR Issues and Activities in Mergers and Acquisitions , 2001 .

[14]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  A framework for assessing IT integration decision-making in mergers and acquisitions , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[15]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations , 1993, IBM Syst. J..

[16]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Enterprise Architecture As Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution , 2006 .

[17]  Marcus Eul,et al.  Strategic IT Management , 2010 .

[18]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  Disintegrating information technology in corporate divestitures , 2009 .

[19]  James Earl Anderson.  Making Operational Sense of Mergers and Acquisitions , 1999 .

[20]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  European Conference on Information Systems ( ECIS ) 2010 Managing the IT Carve-Out in a SBU Divestment , 2017 .

[21]  David Pettifer,et al.  Redesigning the corporate centre , 2001 .

[22]  P. Weill,et al.  Building IT Infrastructure for Strategic Agility , 2002 .

[23]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  De profundis? Deconstructing the concept of strategic alignment , 1997, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[24]  P. Weill,et al.  Management by Maxim: How Business and IT Managers Can Create IT Infrastructures , 1997 .

[25]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Alignment Between Business and IS Strategies: A Study of Prospectors, Analyzers, and Defenders , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  Roni Michaely,et al.  The choice of going public: spin-offs vs. carve-outs , 1995 .

[27]  Thomas Mellewigt,et al.  Thirty Years After Michael E. Porter: What Do We Know About Business Exit? , 2007 .

[28]  Philip Yetton,et al.  Reducing the technical complexity and business risk of major systems projects , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[29]  Philipp Mayring.  Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse : Grundlagen und Techniken , 2003 .

[30]  Blaize Horner Reich,et al.  IT alignment: what have we learned? , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[31]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[32]  Blake Ives,et al.  Review: IT-Dependent Strategic Initiatives and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature , 2005, MIS Q..

[33]  Andrew Campbell,et al.  Corporate strategy and parenting theory , 1998 .

[34]  Matthias Brauer,et al.  What Have We Acquired and What Should We Acquire in Divestiture Research? A Review and Research Agenda , 2006 .

[35]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Managing an IT carve-out at a multi-national enterprise , 2009, ECIS.

[36]  R. Yin,et al.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed. , 2009 .

[37]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Exploring Success Factors for IT Carve Out Projects , 2008, ECIS.

[38]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[39]  Andrew Campbell,et al.  Parenting in Complex Structures , 2002 .

[40]  A. J. Gilbert Silvius,et al.  Aligning IT Strategy to Business Strategy in a Multi-Business Company , 2007, AMCIS.

[41]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Factors That Influence the Social Dimension of Alignment Between Business and Information Technology Objectives , 2000, MIS Q..