Tubulin folding cofactor D is a microtubule destabilizing protein

A rapid switch between growth and shrinkage at microtubule ends is fundamental for many cellular processes. The main structural components of microtubules, the αβ‐tubulin heterodimers, are generated through a complex folding process where GTP hydrolysis [Fontalba et al. (1993) J. Cell Sci. 106, 627–632] and a series of molecular chaperones are required [Sternlicht et al. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 9422–9426; Campo et al. (1994) FEBS Lett. 353, 162–166; Lewis et al. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 132, 1–4; Lewis et al. (1997) Trends Cell Biol. 7, 479–484; Tian et al. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 138, 821–823]. Although the participation of the cofactor proteins along the tubulin folding route has been well established in vitro, there is also evidence that these protein cofactors might contribute to diverse microtubule processes in vivo [Schwahn et al. (1998) Nature Genet. 19, 327–332; Hirata et al. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 658–666; Fanarraga et al. (1999) Cell Motil. Cytoskel. 43, 243–254]. Microtubule dynamics, crucial during mitosis, cellular motility and intracellular transport processes, are known to be regulated by at least four known microtubule‐destabilizing proteins. OP18/Stathmin and XKCM1 are microtubule catastrophe‐inducing factors operating through different mechanisms [Waters and Salmon (1996) Curr. Biol. 6, 361–363; McNally (1999) Curr. Biol. 9, R274–R276]. Here we show that the tubulin folding cofactor D, although it does not co‐polymerize with microtubules either in vivo or in vitro, modulates microtubule dynamics by sequestering β‐tubulin from GTP‐bound αβ‐heterodimers.

[1]  B. Howell,et al.  Dissociation of the tubulin-sequestering and microtubule catastrophe-promoting activities of oncoprotein 18/stathmin. , 1999, Molecular biology of the cell.

[2]  S. Ben‐Sasson,et al.  Identification of programmed cell death in situ via specific labeling of nuclear DNA fragmentation , 1992, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  L. M. Sánchez,et al.  A 14 kDa release factor is involved in GTP‐dependent β‐tubulin folding , 1994 .

[4]  Nicholas J. Cowan,et al.  The α- and β-tubulin folding pathways , 1997 .

[5]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Dynamic instability of microtubule growth , 1984, Nature.

[6]  Nicholas J. Cowan,et al.  Tubulin Folding Cofactors as GTPase-activating Proteins , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  T. Hunt,et al.  Plasmid cDNA-directed protein synthesis in a coupled eukaryotic in vitro transcription-translation system. , 1992, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  J. Ávila,et al.  OP18/stathmin binds near the C-terminus of tubulin and facilitates GTP binding. , 1999, European journal of biochemistry.

[9]  S. Lewis,et al.  Chaperonin-mediated folding of actin and tubulin , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[10]  Nicholas J. Cowan,et al.  Tubulin Subunits Exist in an Activated Conformational State Generated and Maintained by Protein Cofactors , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[11]  M. Yaffe,et al.  The t-complex polypeptide 1 complex is a chaperonin for tubulin and actin in vivo. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  R. Kopito,et al.  Aggresomes: A Cellular Response to Misfolded Proteins , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[13]  J. Ávila,et al.  Regulated expression of p14 (cofactor A) during spermatogenesis. , 1999, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[14]  N. Cowan,et al.  Tubulin dimer formation via the release of α‐ and β‐tubulin monomers from multimolecular complexes , 1992 .

[15]  T. Toda,et al.  Essential role of tubulin‐folding cofactor D in microtubule assembly and its association with microtubules in fission yeast , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[16]  Steffen Lenzner,et al.  Positional cloning of the gene for X-linked retinitis pigmentosa 2 , 1998, Nature Genetics.