Transformation processes upon the visual code

Seven experiments investigated whether orientation-dependent latency functions for the visual code resemble those observed in studies of mental rotations of visual images. The subjects were required to perform “same-different” classifications of two simultaneously presented letters. The dependent variables considered were reaction time IRT and accuracy. Experiments 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 showed that subjects could correctly classify two different letters on the basis of the visual code without preceding transformations. Experiments 1, 2, and 7 showed orientationdependent effects for “same“ responses. It appeared, however, that orientation functions for the visual cede were clearly different from those previously observed for visual images. In addition, the findings of Experiments 4, 5, and 6 indicated that a frame that jointly rotated with the disoriented letters could eliminate the orientation-dependent effects for “same” responses. Experiment 7 showed that the results of Experiments 4, 5, and 6 must be attributed to the structural characteristics of the frame and not to a directional cue. The results of Experiment 3 seemed to demonstrate that transformations did not occur when the subjects used the phonetic code to classify the letters. Overall, the results of the seven experiments were considered to provide a demonstration of the importance of the distinction between the operations on visual images and those on the visual code.

[1]  M. Corballis,et al.  Detection of symmetry as a function of angular orientation. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  P. A. Kolers,et al.  Orientation of letters and errors in their recognition , 1969 .

[3]  M. Posner Chronometric explorations of mind , 1978 .

[4]  J. L. Myers Fundamentals of Experimental Design , 1972 .

[5]  B. J. Winer Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[6]  L. Cooper Mental rotation of random two-dimensional shapes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Same-different judgments with words and nonwords: The differential effects of relative size , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[8]  M. Corballis,et al.  What’s up in mental rotation? , 1976 .

[9]  J. Hochberg,et al.  The effect of landmark features on mental rotation times , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[10]  M. Corballis,et al.  Mental rotation under head tilt: Factors influencing the location of the subjective reference frame , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  F. Attneave,et al.  Voluntary control of frame of reference and slope equivalence under head rotation. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  F. Attneave,et al.  Discriminability of stimuli varying in physical and retinal orientation , 1967 .

[13]  Howard E. Egeth,et al.  Differential effects of familiarity on judgments of sameness and difference , 1971 .

[14]  John Theios,et al.  Reaction Time Measurements in the Study of Memory Processes: Theory and Data1 , 1973 .

[15]  R. Shepard,et al.  The time required to prepare for a rotated stimulus , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[16]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge" in the psychology of computer vision , 1975 .

[17]  R. W. Berrian,et al.  Effects of irrelevant color changes of speed of visual recognition following short retention intervals. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  C. Umilta,et al.  Laterality effects, levels of processing, and stimulus properties. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Robert G. Pachella,et al.  Stimulus probability and same-different classification , 1976 .

[20]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[21]  M. Corballis,et al.  Decisions about identity and orientation of rotated letters and digits , 1978, Memory & cognition.

[22]  B. Ambler,et al.  The familiarity effect for single-letter pairs. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  David R. Olson,et al.  On the mental representation of oblique orientation. , 1977 .

[24]  H E Egeth,et al.  Selective attention in the speeded classification and comparison of multidimensional stimuli , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  C. Bundesen,et al.  Visual transformation of size. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Abstraction and The Process of Recognition , 1970 .

[27]  L. Cooper,et al.  Mental transformations and visual comparison processes: effects of complexity and similarity. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  C. Bundesen,et al.  Size scaling in visual pattern recognition. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Encoding, stimulus-response compatibility, and stages of processing , 1977 .

[30]  R. Shepard,et al.  CHRONOMETRIC STUDIES OF THE ROTATION OF MENTAL IMAGES , 1973 .

[31]  Irvin Rock,et al.  Orientation and form , 1974 .

[32]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Mental size scaling examined , 1976, Memory & cognition.