The size of the supraspinatus outlet during elevation of the arm in the frontal and sagittal plane: a 3-D model study.

OBJECTIVE To quantify the size of the supraspinatus outlet as it is dictated by both the three-dimensional geometry of the shoulder and the relative orientation of the humerus with respect to the scapula during motions of the arm. DESIGN Previously obtained data of shoulder kinematics were brought into a geometrical model of the shoulder, derived from a cadaver study. BACKGROUND Knowledge of the parameters dictating the size of the supraspinatus outlet is essential for a better understanding of the impingement syndrome of the shoulder. METHODS A geometrical model, based on fitting spheres to various anatomical items of the shoulder was derived from three-dimensional position data of the gleno-humeral joint and coraco-acromial arch of 32 cadaver shoulders. Kinematical data were collected from 10 healthy volunteers. The geometrical and kinematical data were combined to study the supraspinatus outlet during elevation of the humerus in the frontal and sagittal plane. RESULTS No single geometry parameter correlated significantly with the initial size of the outlet. During arm elevation, the greater tuberosity was moved away from the coraco-acromial arch quite effectively resulting in narrowing of the outlet during elevation in the frontal plane from 60 degrees to 120 degrees only. Deviations from the average were quite substantial. This was caused by kinematical and especially geometrical variability. CONCLUSION The size of the outlet is dictated by both the geometry and kinematics of the gleno-humeral joint. Assessment of the individual susceptibility to impingement requires three-dimensional viewing techniques including three-dimensional movements of both the scapula and humerus. RELEVANCE Little is known about etiology and pathogenesis of various shoulder disorders such as the impingement syndrome. The supraspinatus outlet plays probably a key role. More knowledge on the architecture of the outlet is required for a better understanding.

[1]  G R Johnson,et al.  A method for the measurement of three-dimensional scapular movement. , 1993, Clinical biomechanics.

[2]  J. Iannotti,et al.  The normal glenohumeral relationships. An anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  B Peterson,et al.  Biomechanical model of the human shoulder joint--II. The shoulder rhythm. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  S. Totterman,et al.  Relationship between the lateral acromion angle and rotator cuff disease. , 1995, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[5]  V C Mow,et al.  Articular geometry of the glenohumeral joint. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  R. J. Pawluk,et al.  Excursion of the Rotator Cuff Under the Acromion , 1994, The American journal of sports medicine.

[7]  L. Bigliani,et al.  The morphology of the acromion and its relationship to rotator cuff tears , 1986 .

[8]  F. V. D. van der Helm,et al.  Three-dimensional recording and description of motions of the shoulder mechanism. , 1995, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[9]  J. Iannotti,et al.  Roentgenographic assessment of acromial morphologic condition in rotator cuff impingement syndrome. , 1995, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[10]  F. V. D. van der Helm,et al.  Geometry parameters for musculoskeletal modelling of the shoulder system. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  F. Golding,et al.  The shoulder--the forgotten joint. , 1962, The British journal of radiology.

[12]  V. Mow,et al.  The relationship of acromial architecture to rotator cuff disease. , 1991, Clinics in sports medicine.

[13]  J A Sidles,et al.  Translation of the humeral head on the glenoid with passive glenohumeral motion. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  C.G.M. Meskers,et al.  3D shoulder position measurements using a six-degree-of-freedom electromagnetic tracking device. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[15]  F C van der Helm,et al.  In vivo estimation of the glenohumeral joint rotation center from scapular bony landmarks by linear regression. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  F C van der Helm,et al.  The palpator: an instrument for measuring the positions of bones in three dimensions. , 1991, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[17]  C. Neer,et al.  Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report. , 1972, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  Cotton Re,et al.  TEARS OF THE HUMERAL ROTATOR CUFF; A RADIOLOGICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL NECROPSY SURVEY. , 1964 .

[19]  F. Kummer,et al.  The influence of coracoacromial arch anatomy on rotator cuff tears. , 1992, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[20]  F. Kummer,et al.  Interobserver reliability of acromial morphology classification: an anatomic study. , 1997, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[21]  W. Mallon,et al.  Reliability of radiographic assessment of acromial morphology. , 1995, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.