Sparse movement data can reveal social influences on individual travel decisions

The monitoring of animal movement patterns provides insights into animals decision-making behaviour. It is generally assumed that high-resolution data are needed to extract meaningful behavioural patterns, which potentially limits the application of this approach. Obtaining high-resolution movement data continues to be an economic and technical challenge, particularly for animals that live in social groups. Here, we test whether accurate movement behaviour can be extracted from data that possesses increasingly lower temporal resolution. To do so, we use a modified version of force matching, in which simulated forces acting on a focal animal are compared to observed movement data. We show that useful information can be extracted from sparse data. We apply this approach to a sparse movement dataset collected on the adult members of a troop of baboons in the DeHoop Nature Reserve, South Africa. We use these data to test the hypothesis that individuals are sensitive to isolation from the group as a whole or, alternatively, whether they are sensitive to the location of specific individuals within the group. Using data from a focal animal, our data provide support for both hypothesis, with stronger support for the latter. Although the focal animal was found to be sensitive to the group, this occurred only on a small number of occasions when the group as a whole was highly clustered as a single entity away from the focal animal. We suggest that specific social interactions may thus drive overall group cohesion. Given that sparse movement data is informative about individual movement behaviour, we suggest that both high (~seconds) and relatively low (~minutes) resolution datasets are valuable for the study of how individuals react to and manipulate their local social and ecological environments.

[1]  Eliezer Gurarie,et al.  A novel method for identifying behavioural changes in animal movement data. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[2]  Andrew J. King,et al.  Dominance and Affiliation Mediate Despotism in a Social Primate , 2008, Current Biology.

[3]  L. Conradt,et al.  Consensus decision making in animals. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  James B. Adams,et al.  Interatomic Potentials from First-Principles Calculations: The Force-Matching Method , 1993, cond-mat/9306054.

[5]  Martin Nilsson Jacobi,et al.  Determining interaction rules in animal swarms , 2010 .

[6]  O. Schülke,et al.  Ecological and Social Determinants of Group Cohesiveness and Within-Group Spatial Position in Wild Assamese Macaques , 2015 .

[7]  Y. Tsuji,et al.  Variation in Spatial Cohesiveness in a Group of Japanese Macaques (Macaca fuscata) , 2011, International Journal of Primatology.

[8]  I. Couzin,et al.  Shared decision-making drives collective movement in wild baboons , 2015, Science.

[9]  E. Revilla,et al.  A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Christian Rutz,et al.  Reality mining of animal social systems. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  R. Kays,et al.  Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet , 2015, Science.

[12]  David Ardia,et al.  DEoptim: An R Package for Global Optimization by Differential Evolution , 2009 .

[13]  M. Hebblewhite,et al.  Distinguishing technology from biology: a critical review of the use of GPS telemetry data in ecology , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[15]  Robert Weibel,et al.  Discovering relative motion patterns in groups of moving point objects , 2005, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[16]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Inferring individual rules from collective behavior , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  F. Cagnacci,et al.  Animal ecology meets GPS-based radiotelemetry: a perfect storm of opportunities and challenges , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  D. Lusseau,et al.  What is a subgroup? How socioecological factors influence interindividual distance , 2012 .

[19]  Andrew J. King,et al.  A rule-of-thumb based on social affiliation explains collective movements in desert baboons , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  Peter I. Corke,et al.  Monitoring Animal Behaviour and Environmental Interactions Using Wireless Sensor Networks, GPS Collars and Satellite Remote Sensing , 2009, Sensors.