To use or to move: goal-set modulates priming when grasping real tools

How we interact with objects depends on what we intend to do with them. In the current work, we show that priming and the kinematics of grasping depend on the goals of grasping, as well as the context in which tasks are presented. We asked participants to grasp familiar kitchen tools in order to either move them, grasp-to-move (GTM), or to demonstrate their common use, grasp-to-use (GTU). When tasks were blocked separately (Experiment 1), we found that priming was only evident for the GTU task. However, when tasks were presented in the same block of trials (Experiment 2), we observed priming for both tasks. Independent of priming, differences in kinematics and reaction times according to task were evident for both Experiments. Longer reaction times for the GTU task indicate more extensive planning, and differences in grasping reflect the characteristics of subsequent actions. Priming of real grasping is determined by task goals as well as task setting, both of which are likely to modulate how object features (affordances) are perceived and influence the planning of future actions.

[1]  F. Lhermitte.  'Utilization behaviour' and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. , 1983, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  B. P. McCloskey,et al.  Knowledge about hand shaping and knowledge about objects. , 1987, Journal of motor behavior.

[3]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.

[4]  E. Reed.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[5]  R L Klatzky,et al.  Timecourse of preshaping for functional responses to objects. , 1989, Journal of motor behavior.

[6]  T. Shallice,et al.  The origins of utilization behaviour. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  L. Jakobson,et al.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them , 1991, Nature.

[8]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[9]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Planning macroscopic aspects of manual control , 1992 .

[10]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Time course of movement planning: selection of handgrips for object manipulation. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Impairment of grasping movements following a bilateral posterior parietal lesion , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  M Schleidt,et al.  Temporal organisation of action in baboons: comparisons with the temporal segmentation in chimpanzee and human behaviour. , 1994, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[13]  Angela Sirigu,et al.  A Selective Impairment of Hand Posture for Object Utilization in Apraxia , 1995, Cortex.

[14]  R L Klatzky,et al.  Planning for hand shape and arm transport when reaching for objects. , 1995, Acta psychologica.

[15]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Evidence for visuomotor priming effect , 1996, Neuroreport.

[16]  A. Milner,et al.  Visuomotor sensitivity for shape and orientation in a patient with visual form agnosia , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Object representation in the ventral premotor cortex (area F5) of the monkey. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Visual affordances direct action: neuropsychological evidence from manual interference. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[19]  R. Ellis,et al.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  One more cup of coffee for the road: object–action assemblies, response blocking and response capture after frontal lobe damage , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  G. Humphreys,et al.  NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL EVIDENCE DISTINGUISHING OBJECT SELECTION FROM ACTION (EFFECTOR) SELECTION , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[22]  H. Sakata,et al.  Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  Alex Martin,et al.  Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream , 2000, NeuroImage.

[24]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Detection by action: neuropsychological evidence for action-defined templates in search , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  J. Riddoch,et al.  Visual affordances and object selection , 2001 .

[26]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  Action matters: The role of action plans and object affordances in selection for action , 2002 .

[27]  M. Gentilucci.  Object motor representation and reaching–grasping control , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Visual Search Is Modulated by Action Intentions , 2002, Psychological science.

[29]  Cindy M. Bukach,et al.  Gesturing and Naming , 2003, Psychological science.

[30]  Maurizio Gentilucci.  Object familiarity affects finger shaping during grasping of fruit stalks , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Motor facilitation following action observation: A behavioural study in prehensile action , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[32]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Cognitive representations of hand posture in ideomotor apraxia , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Cross-task strategic effects , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[34]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Grasping the meaning of words , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  Katsumi Aoki,et al.  Recent development of flow visualization , 2004, J. Vis..

[36]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  Parietal cortex neurons of the monkey related to the visual guidance of hand movement , 1990, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  R. Ellis,et al.  Action priming by briefly presented objects. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[38]  M. Goodale,et al.  Naming and grasping common objects: a priming study , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  M. E. McCarty,et al.  Reaching beyond spatial perception: Effects of intended future actions on visually guided prehension , 2004 .

[40]  R. Cohen,et al.  Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: generation and recall of motor plans , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  Jonathan S. Cant,et al.  No evidence for visuomotor priming in a visually guided action task , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  M. Santello,et al.  Effects of end-goal on hand shaping. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  C. Armbrüster,et al.  Movement planning in prehension: do intended actions influence the initial reach and grasp movement? , 2006, Motor control.

[45]  A. Sirigu,et al.  How we interact with objects: learning from brain lesions , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Differential effects of advance semantic cues on grasping, naming, and manual estimation , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  Miles C. Bowman,et al.  Control strategies in object manipulation tasks , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[48]  Jody C. Culham,et al.  Does tool-related fMRI activity within the intraparietal sulcus reflect the plan to grasp? , 2007, NeuroImage.

[49]  S. Frey.  What Puts the How in Where? Tool Use and the Divided Visual Streams Hypothesis , 2007, Cortex.

[50]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: evidence that the dorsal stream does not only control visually guided actions in real time. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  Luca Turella,et al.  An object for an action, the same object for other actions: effects on hand shaping , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[52]  T. Flash,et al.  Task-Dependent Selection of Grasp Kinematics and Stiffness in Human Object Manipulation , 2007, Cortex.

[53]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Automatic adjustment of visuomotor readiness. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[54]  Gerald Westheimer,et al.  Grouping of contextual elements that affect vernier thresholds. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[55]  Ed Symes,et al.  Visual object affordances: object orientation. , 2007, Acta psychologica.

[56]  M. Gentilucci,et al.  Automatic grasp imitation following action observation affects estimation of intrinsic object properties , 2008, Brain Research.

[57]  George S. Cree,et al.  Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words , 2008, Cognition.

[58]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Grasping future events: explicit knowledge of the availability of visual feedback fails to reliably influence prehension , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[59]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Updating the programming of a precision grip is a function of recent history of available feedback , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[60]  Luigi Cattaneo,et al.  Broken affordances, broken objects: A TMS study , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[61]  J. Hermsdörfer,et al.  Grasping tools: Effects of task and apraxia , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[62]  G. Vingerhoets,et al.  Conceptual and physical object qualities contribute differently to motor affordances , 2009, Brain and Cognition.

[63]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: Rapid decay of dorsal stream information , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[64]  Jonathan Vaughan,et al.  The posture-based motion planning framework: new findings related to object manipulation, moving around obstacles, moving in three spatial dimensions, and haptic tracking. , 2009, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[65]  Jody C Culham,et al.  Is That within Reach? fMRI Reveals That the Human Superior Parieto-Occipital Cortex Encodes Objects Reachable by the Hand , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[66]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[67]  Jonathan S. Cant,et al.  No evidence for visuomotor priming in a visually-guided action task , 2010 .

[68]  Yong Li,et al.  Different left brain regions are essential for grasping a tool compared with its subsequent use , 2010, NeuroImage.

[69]  J. Kien,et al.  Temporal Segmentation in Hand Movements of Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and Comparisons with Humans , 2010 .

[70]  Katherine L. Roberts,et al.  The interaction of attention and action: from seeing action to acting on perception. , 2010, British journal of psychology.

[71]  D. Bub,et al.  Priming of reach and grasp actions by handled objects. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.