Performance analysis of multi-spectral and panchromatic image fusion techniques based on two wavelet discrete approaches

Abstract During the past few years, many fusion algorithms have been proposed to combine a high-resolution panchromatic image with a low-resolution multi-spectral image to generate a high-resolution multi-spectral image. Among them, the wavelet-based algorithm has gained its popularity due to its ability of multi-resolution decomposition. More specifically, the wavelet transform is first applied to images. The wavelet coefficients are then combined based on a certain rule to produce the fused image. In this paper, we evaluated the performances of both the wavelet transform discrete approaches and the coefficient combination methods when they are applied to fuse multi-spectral and panchromatic images. For the discrete approaches of the wavelet transform, Mallat and “a trous” algorithms are chosen. For the coefficient combination, the additive wavelet method, the additive wavelet intensity method and the additive wavelet principal component method are selected. To evaluate the spectral quality of the fused images, correlation coefficient and Q a v g index are used as a local and global measure, respectively. Meanwhile, average gradient and standard deviation are used to evaluate the spatial quality. Our experiments show that keeping the combination method the same, the “a trous” algorithm works better than the Mallat algorithm for the fusion purpose. In addition, if keeping the wavelet discrete algorithm the same, the combination methods mentioned above are found to have different advantages between the spatial resolution improvement and the spectral quality preservation.

[1]  W. J. Carper,et al.  The use of intensity-hue-saturation transformations for merging SPOT panchromatic and multispectral image data , 1990 .

[2]  J. Zhou,et al.  A wavelet transform method to merge Landsat TM and SPOT panchromatic data , 1998 .

[3]  Ph. Tchamitchian,et al.  Wavelets: Time-Frequency Methods and Phase Space , 1992 .

[4]  D. Yocky Image merging and data fusion by means of the discrete two-dimensional wavelet transform , 1995 .

[5]  Amrane Houacine,et al.  Redundant versus orthogonal wavelet decomposition for multisensor image fusion , 2003, Pattern Recognit..

[6]  L. Wald,et al.  Fusion of high spatial and spectral resolution images : The ARSIS concept and its implementation , 2000 .

[7]  Stephen J. Sangwine,et al.  Colour image filters based on hypercomplex convolution , 2000 .

[8]  Luciano Alparone,et al.  Image fusion—the ARSIS concept and some successful implementation schemes , 2003 .

[9]  Thierry Blu,et al.  Using iterated rational filter banks within the ARSIS concept for producing 10 m Landsat multispectral images , 1998 .

[10]  J. Chassery,et al.  The use of multiresolution analysis and wavelets transform for merging SPOT panchromatic and multisp , 1996 .

[11]  Richard Kronland-Martinet,et al.  A real-time algorithm for signal analysis with the help of the wavelet transform , 1989 .

[12]  Xavier Otazu,et al.  Multiresolution-based image fusion with additive wavelet decomposition , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[13]  Luciano Alparone,et al.  A global quality measurement of pan-sharpened multispectral imagery , 2004, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[14]  S. Sides,et al.  Comparison of three different methods to merge multiresolution and multispectral data: Landsat TM and SPOT panchromatic , 1991 .

[15]  Y. Chibani,et al.  The joint use of IHS transform and redundant wavelet decomposition for fusing multispectral and panchromatic images , 2002 .

[16]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..