The niche of higher plants: evidence for phylogenetic conservatism

A species' ecological niche depends on the species' adaptations to its present habitat, but also on the legacy from its ancestors. Most authors argue that such a phylogenetic niche conservatism is of minor importance, although no quantitative analyses across a major taxon is available. Higher plants from central Europe offer a unique opportunity for such an exercise, as the niche positions along various environmental gradients are available for most species. We quantified niche conservatism by two approaches. First, we used a phylogenetic tree and quantified the degree of retention of niches across the tree. Depending on the gradient, the values ranged from 0.43 to 0.22. This was significantly greater than the null expectation. Second, we used a taxonomy and quantified the amount of variance among species that could be explained at higher taxonomic levels. The values ranged from 25 to 72%. Again, this was significantly higher than the null expectation. Thus, both approaches indicated a clear niche conservatism. The distribution of conservatism across taxonomic levels differed considerably among environmental gradients. The differences among environmental gradients could be correlated with the palaeoenvironmental conditions during the radiation of the phylogenetic lineages. Thus, niche conservatism among extant plant species may reflect the opportunities of their ancestors during their diversification.

[1]  D. Maddison,et al.  MacClade 4: analysis of phy-logeny and character evolution , 2003 .

[2]  S. Wing Evolution and Expansion of Flowering Plants , 2000 .

[3]  A. P. Schaffers,et al.  Reliability of Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, nitrogen and soil reaction: a comparison with field measurements , 2000 .

[4]  P. Reich,et al.  Convergence and correlations among leaf size and function in seed plants: a comparative test using independent contrasts. , 1999, American journal of botany.

[5]  P. Herendeen,et al.  Phylogenetic pattern, diversity, and diversification of Eudicots , 1999 .

[6]  M. Donoghue,et al.  Leaf Size, Sapling Allometry, and Corner's Rules: Phylogeny and Correlated Evolution in Maples (Acer) , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[7]  S. Stanley,et al.  Earth System History , 1998 .

[8]  S. Wing,et al.  Ecological aspects of the Cretaceous flowering plant radiation , 1998 .

[9]  Knox,et al.  The use of hierarchies as organizational models in systematics , 1998, Biological journal of the Linnean Society. Linnean Society of London.

[10]  Hank Wolfe Privacy enhancing technology , 1997 .

[11]  V. Krassilov Angiosperm Origins: Morphological and Ecological Aspects , 1997 .

[12]  Michael L. Rosenzweig,et al.  Species Diversity in Space and Time , 1997 .

[13]  J. A. Wolfe Relations of Environmental Change to Angiosperm Evolution During the Late Cretaceous and Tertiary , 1997 .

[14]  R. Bateman,et al.  Plant paleoecology and evolutionary inference: two examples from the Paleozoic , 1996 .

[15]  D. Baum,et al.  Molecular Phylogenies and the Diversification of the Angiosperms , 1996 .

[16]  A. Fitter,et al.  COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF BRITISH ANGIOSPERMS , 1994 .

[17]  R. Potts,et al.  Terrestrial Ecosystems Through Time , 1993 .

[18]  Wayne P. Maddison,et al.  Macclade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution/Version 3 , 1992 .

[19]  R. Aronson,et al.  THE PENNSYLVANIAN‐PERMIAN VEGETATIONAL TRANSITION: A TERRESTRIAL ANALOGUE TO THE ONSHORE‐OFFSHORE HYPOTHESIS , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Incumbent replacement: evidence for long-term evolutionary progress , 1991, Paleobiology.

[21]  M. Pagel,et al.  The comparative method in evolutionary biology , 1991 .

[22]  A. Boucot Evolutionary Paleobiology of Behavior and Coevolution , 1990 .

[23]  Dieter Frank,et al.  Biologisch-ökologische Daten zur Flora der DDR , 1990 .

[24]  J. Farris THE RETENTION INDEX AND THE RESCALED CONSISTENCY INDEX , 1989, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[25]  John A. Wiens,et al.  The Ecology Of Bird Communities , 1989 .

[26]  G. Cowles Studies of Mascarene Island birds: The fossil record , 1987 .

[27]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  Weighted averaging of species indicator values: Its efficiency in environmental calibration , 1986 .

[28]  J. Hodgson Commonness and rarity in plants with special reference to the Sheffield flora part III: Taxonomic and evolutionary aspects , 1986 .

[29]  R. Dahlgren A revised system of classification of the angiosperms , 1980 .

[30]  L. Rüffle Vakhrameev, V. A., Dobruskina, I. A., Meyen, S. V. & Zaklinskaja, E. D., Paläozoische und mesozoische Floren Eurasiens und die Phytogeographie dieser Zeit. 300 S., 30 Abb. VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag. Jena, 1978 , 1980 .

[31]  J. Steward Evolution And Ecology , 1977 .

[32]  G. Ledyard Stebbins,et al.  Flowering Plants: Evolution Above the Species Level , 1975 .

[33]  J. Grinnell The Niche-Relationships of the California Thrasher , 1917 .