Confusing messages of sustainability indicators

This study examines sustainability indicators using the sustainability report of the Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry as the case study. The report is a compilation of indicators designed to assess the sustainability of natural resource management. The interviews with the users revealed, however, that the indicators have not been particularly effective in informing the actors or in affecting their behaviour. Clearly, the informative value of the indicators has been overrated and the complexity of the information transfer has been underestimated. At least partly, the difficulties were due to the obscurity of the indicator-concept itself and consequently to their improper use. First, the statistics with the objective state-of-affairs information should be distinguished from the indicators that are always related to policy discussion. In addition, the technical and communicative use of the indicators should be distinguished from each other as they have different relationship between the information, policy values and the associated activities.

[1]  Evert Vedung,et al.  The Sermon: Information Programs in the Public Policy Process—Choice, Effects, and Evaluation , 2017 .

[2]  Stephen Dovers,et al.  Sustainability indicators, policy and governance: Issues for ecological economics , 2006 .

[3]  Jean-Louis Denis,et al.  The power of numbers in strategizing , 2006 .

[4]  H. Chalmers,et al.  Addressing environmental inequalities in UK policy: An action research perspective , 2005 .

[5]  D. M. Shucksmith,et al.  Rural development policy and community data needs in Scotland , 2005 .

[6]  Kenneth D. Plowman.  Conflict, strategic management, and public relations , 2005 .

[7]  A. Hezri,et al.  Sustainability indicator system and policy processes in Malaysia: a framework for utilisation and learning. , 2004, Journal of environmental management.

[8]  Yvonne Rydin,et al.  Local Sustainability Indicators , 2003 .

[9]  Florentina Astleithner,et al.  The Analysis of Sustainability Indicators as Socially Constructed Policy Instruments: benefits and challenges of ‘interactive research’ , 2003 .

[10]  David J. Cooper,et al.  Performance Measures and the Rationalization of Organizations , 2003 .

[11]  M. Hajer.  Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void , 2003 .

[12]  M. Åkerman,et al.  Temporal scales and environmental knowledge production , 2002 .

[13]  D. Shields.  The role of values and objectives in communicating indicators of sustainability , 2002 .

[14]  Timo Peuhkuri,et al.  Knowledge and interpretation in environmental conflict Fish farming and eutrophication in the Archipelago Sea, SW Finland , 2002 .

[15]  Stephen Morse,et al.  Breaking through the Glass Ceiling: Who really cares about sustainability indicators? , 2001 .

[16]  Usha Iyer-Raniga,et al.  FORUM: A Context for Participation in Sustainable Development , 2000, Environmental management.

[17]  Jeff Coutts,et al.  The sustainability indicator industry: where to from here? A focus group study to explore the potential of farmer participation in the development of indicators. , 2000 .

[18]  Tony Meppem,et al.  Different ways of knowing: a communicative turn toward sustainability , 1999 .

[19]  Michael Dalton,et al.  Knowledge and the environment , 1999 .

[20]  Kristine L. Kelly.  A systems approach to identifying decisive information for sustainable development , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Roderic A. Gill,et al.  Planning for sustainability as a learning concept , 1998 .

[22]  Maarten A. Hajer,et al.  The Politics of Environmental Discourse , 1997 .

[23]  Sanna Talja,et al.  Constituting “information” and “user” as research objects: a theory of knowledge formations as an alternative to the information man-theory , 1997 .

[24]  J. Meadowcroft,et al.  Planning, Democracy and the Challenge of Sustainable Development , 1997 .

[25]  J. Hannigan,et al.  Environmental Sociology: A Social Constructionist Perspective , 1995 .

[26]  Erik Albæk.  Between knowledge and power: Utilization of social science in public policy making , 1995 .

[27]  John D. Sterman,et al.  Learning in and about complex systems , 1994 .

[28]  E. Weiss.  United Nations Conference on Environment and Development , 1992, International Legal Materials.

[29]  R. Bawden.  Systems thinking and practice in agriculture , 1991 .

[30]  H. H. Williams.  Reconstruction in Philosophy , 1921 .

[31]  A. A. Hezria.  Sustainability indicator system and policy processes in Malaysia : a framework for utilisation and learning , 2004 .

[32]  Kevin Parris Oecd.  ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR : USING INDICATORS AS A TOOL FOR POLICY PURPOSES , 2002 .

[33]  Vicente Carabias-Hütter,et al.  Indicators into action : local sustainability indicator sets in their context , 2002 .

[34]  Helen Wallace,et al.  The Council and the European Parliament , 1997 .

[35]  Kees van der Heijden,et al.  Scenarios , Strategies and the Strategy Process , 1997 .

[36]  Erik Albæk,et al.  Between knowledge and power: Utilization of social science in public policy making , 1995 .

[37]  W. Sombroek,et al.  Planning for sustainable use of land resources: towards a new approach. Background paper to FAO's Task Managership for Chapter 10 of Agenda 21 of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) , 1995 .

[38]  G. Treloar,et al.  A Context for Participation in Sustainable Development , 2022 .