Spatial distortions induced by multiple visual landmarks: How local distortions combine to produce complex distortion patterns

Visual landmarks introduce systematic distortions into spatial short-term memory for single target positions, the exact form of the distortion depending on the spatial layout of the landmarks. In two experiments, we investigated how the combined effect of two landmarks can be predicted from the effects of individual landmarks. Participants used a mouse cursor to reproduce the positions of briefly presented targets in the context of one, the other, or both landmarks. We found that distortions near a landmark are independent of whether another landmark is present, so that remembered space is partitioned into regions dominated by single landmarks. Interestingly, the display midpoint behaves like a “virtual landmark,” with its own pattern of distortion. Results are inconsistent with current models of spatial memory distortions but suggest that attentional processes can lead to enhanced fidelity of salient regions in topographical neural networks while also introducing some spatial biases.

[1]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Immediate memory for spatial location. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[2]  D J Bryant,et al.  Strategic and perceptual factors producing tilt contrast in dot localization , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[3]  J. Psotka Perceptual processes that may create stick figures and balance. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  L. Hedges,et al.  Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location. , 1991, Psychological review.

[5]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  A Model of Visuospatial Working Memory in Prefrontal Cortex: Recurrent Network and Cellular Bistability , 1998, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[6]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[7]  Dirk Kerzel,et al.  Immediate spatial distortions of pointing movements induced by visual landmarks , 2004 .

[8]  Thomas Schmidt,et al.  Investigating Spatial Reference Systems through Distortions in Visual Memory , 2000, Spatial Cognition.

[9]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Compression of space in visual memory , 2001, Vision Research.

[10]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Focused attention distorts visual space: an attentional repulsion effect. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Category Effects on Estimates of Stimuli: Perception or Reconstruction? , 2000, Psychological science.

[12]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[13]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Mnemonic coding of visual space in the monkey's dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  B McCabe,et al.  Memory for locations within regions: Spatial biases and visual hemifield differences , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[15]  H. Barlow Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology by Stephen E. Palmer , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Scott E. Maxwell,et al.  Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective , 1990 .

[17]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Early stages in a sensorimotor transformation , 1992, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[18]  T. Schmidt Spatial Distortions in Visual Short-Term Memory , 2002 .

[19]  C. Gilbert Adult cortical dynamics. , 1998, Physiological reviews.

[20]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  The time course of spatial memory distortions , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[21]  Brian P. Dyre,et al.  Bias in proportion judgments: the cyclical power model. , 2000, Psychological review.