Let ${\mathfrak C}$ be a monster model of an arbitrary theory $T$, $\bar \alpha$ any tuple of bounded length of elements of ${\mathfrak C}$, and $\bar c$ an enumeration of all elements of ${\mathfrak C}$. By $S_{\bar \alpha}({\mathfrak C})$ denote the compact space of all complete types over ${\mathfrak C}$ extending $tp(\bar \alpha/\emptyset)$, and $S_{\bar c}({\mathfrak C})$ is defined analogously. Then $S_{\bar \alpha}({\mathfrak C})$ and $S_{\bar c}({\mathfrak C})$ are naturally $Aut({\mathfrak C})$-flows. We show that the Ellis groups of both these flows are of bounded size (i.e. smaller than the degree of saturation of ${\mathfrak C}$), providing an explicit bound on this size. Next, we prove that these Ellis groups do not depend on the choice of the monster model ${\mathfrak C}$; thus, we say that they are absolute. We also study minimal left ideals (equivalently subflows) of the Ellis semigroups of the flows $S_{\bar \alpha}({\mathfrak C})$ and $S_{\bar c}({\mathfrak C})$. We give an example of a NIP theory in which the minimal left ideals are of unbounded size. We show that in each of these two cases, boundedness of a minimal left ideal is an absolute property (i.e. it does not depend on the choice of ${\mathfrak C}$) and that whenever such an ideal is bounded, then its isomorphism type is also absolute.
Assuming NIP, we give characterizations of when a minimal left ideal of the Ellis semigroup of $S_{\bar c}({\mathfrak C})$ is bounded. Then we adapt a proof of Chernikov and Simon to show that whenever such an ideal is bounded, the natural epimorphism (described by Krupinski, Pillay and Rzepecki) from the Ellis group of the flow $S_{\bar c}({\mathfrak C})$ to the Kim-Pillay Galois group $Gal_{KP}(T)$ is an isomorphism (in particular, $T$ is G-compact). We provide some counter-examples for $S_{\bar \alpha}({\mathfrak C})$ in place of $S_{\bar c}({\mathfrak C})$.
[1]
A. Pillay,et al.
Generalised Bohr compactification and model-theoretic connected components
,
2014,
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[2]
A. Pillay,et al.
Some model theory of SL(2,R)
,
2012,
1208.0196.
[3]
Ludomir Newelski.
Bounded orbits and strongly generic sets
,
2012,
J. Lond. Math. Soc..
[4]
Anand Pillay,et al.
Galois Groups of First order Theories
,
2001,
J. Math. Log..
[5]
A. Chernikov,et al.
Definably amenable NIP groups
,
2015,
1502.04365.
[6]
Byunghan Kim,et al.
The Lascar groups and the first homology groups in model theory
,
2015,
Ann. Pure Appl. Log..
[7]
Anand Pillay,et al.
Hyperimaginaries and automorphism groups
,
2001,
Journal of Symbolic Logic.
[8]
M. Ziegler,et al.
Galois Groups of Rst Order Theories
,
2000
.
[9]
Itay Kaplan,et al.
Forking and Dividing in NTP2 theories
,
2012,
The Journal of Symbolic Logic.
[10]
Ehud Hrushovski,et al.
On NIP and invariant measures
,
2007,
0710.2330.
[11]
L. Newelski.
Model theoretic aspects of the ellis semigroup
,
2012
.
[13]
A. Pillay,et al.
Topological dynamics and the complexity of strong types
,
2015,
Israel Journal of Mathematics.
[14]
A. Pillay,et al.
Amenability, definable groups, and automorphism groups
,
2016,
Advances in Mathematics.
[15]
Ludomir Newelski,et al.
Weak generic types and coverings of groups I
,
2006
.
[16]
Martin Ziegler.
Tits Buildings and the Model Theory of Groups: Introduction to the Lascar Group
,
2002
.
[17]
Ludomir Newelski,et al.
Topological dynamics of definable group actions
,
2009,
The Journal of Symbolic Logic.