Boundedness and absoluteness of some dynamical invariants in model theory

Let ${\mathfrak C}$ be a monster model of an arbitrary theory $T$, $\bar \alpha$ any tuple of bounded length of elements of ${\mathfrak C}$, and $\bar c$ an enumeration of all elements of ${\mathfrak C}$. By $S_{\bar \alpha}({\mathfrak C})$ denote the compact space of all complete types over ${\mathfrak C}$ extending $tp(\bar \alpha/\emptyset)$, and $S_{\bar c}({\mathfrak C})$ is defined analogously. Then $S_{\bar \alpha}({\mathfrak C})$ and $S_{\bar c}({\mathfrak C})$ are naturally $Aut({\mathfrak C})$-flows. We show that the Ellis groups of both these flows are of bounded size (i.e. smaller than the degree of saturation of ${\mathfrak C}$), providing an explicit bound on this size. Next, we prove that these Ellis groups do not depend on the choice of the monster model ${\mathfrak C}$; thus, we say that they are absolute. We also study minimal left ideals (equivalently subflows) of the Ellis semigroups of the flows $S_{\bar \alpha}({\mathfrak C})$ and $S_{\bar c}({\mathfrak C})$. We give an example of a NIP theory in which the minimal left ideals are of unbounded size. We show that in each of these two cases, boundedness of a minimal left ideal is an absolute property (i.e. it does not depend on the choice of ${\mathfrak C}$) and that whenever such an ideal is bounded, then its isomorphism type is also absolute. Assuming NIP, we give characterizations of when a minimal left ideal of the Ellis semigroup of $S_{\bar c}({\mathfrak C})$ is bounded. Then we adapt a proof of Chernikov and Simon to show that whenever such an ideal is bounded, the natural epimorphism (described by Krupinski, Pillay and Rzepecki) from the Ellis group of the flow $S_{\bar c}({\mathfrak C})$ to the Kim-Pillay Galois group $Gal_{KP}(T)$ is an isomorphism (in particular, $T$ is G-compact). We provide some counter-examples for $S_{\bar \alpha}({\mathfrak C})$ in place of $S_{\bar c}({\mathfrak C})$.

[1]  A. Pillay,et al.  Generalised Bohr compactification and model-theoretic connected components , 2014, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[2]  A. Pillay,et al.  Some model theory of SL(2,R) , 2012, 1208.0196.

[3]  Ludomir Newelski Bounded orbits and strongly generic sets , 2012, J. Lond. Math. Soc..

[4]  Anand Pillay,et al.  Galois Groups of First order Theories , 2001, J. Math. Log..

[5]  A. Chernikov,et al.  Definably amenable NIP groups , 2015, 1502.04365.

[6]  Byunghan Kim,et al.  The Lascar groups and the first homology groups in model theory , 2015, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[7]  Anand Pillay,et al.  Hyperimaginaries and automorphism groups , 2001, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[8]  M. Ziegler,et al.  Galois Groups of Rst Order Theories , 2000 .

[9]  Itay Kaplan,et al.  Forking and Dividing in NTP2 theories , 2012, The Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[10]  Ehud Hrushovski,et al.  On NIP and invariant measures , 2007, 0710.2330.

[11]  L. Newelski Model theoretic aspects of the ellis semigroup , 2012 .

[13]  A. Pillay,et al.  Topological dynamics and the complexity of strong types , 2015, Israel Journal of Mathematics.

[14]  A. Pillay,et al.  Amenability, definable groups, and automorphism groups , 2016, Advances in Mathematics.

[15]  Ludomir Newelski,et al.  Weak generic types and coverings of groups I , 2006 .

[16]  Martin Ziegler Tits Buildings and the Model Theory of Groups: Introduction to the Lascar Group , 2002 .

[17]  Ludomir Newelski,et al.  Topological dynamics of definable group actions , 2009, The Journal of Symbolic Logic.