Cell spreading controls balance of prestress by microtubules and extracellular matrix.

The controversy surrounds the cellular tensegrity model. Some suggest that microtubules (MTs) must bear a significant portion of cell contractile stress (prestress) if tensegrity is a useful model. Previously we have shown that for highly spread airway smooth muscle cells (areas>2500 microm2) MTs balance a significant but small potion (average 14%) of the prestress. To further explore if controlling the degree of cell spreading could modulate the portion of the prestress balanced by MTs, we utilized a recent method by which tractions are quantified in cells that are constrained within micropatterned adhesive islands of defined sizes on the surface of flexible polyacrylamide gels containing fluorescent microbeads. The prediction is that if MTs balance a portion of the contractile stress, then, upon their disruption, the portion of the stress balanced by MTs would shift to the substrate, causing an increase in traction and strain energy. We first activated the cells maximally with histamine and then disrupted the MTs with colchicine. Histamine resulted in an increase in intracellular calcium whereas ensuing colchicine addition in the presence of histamine did not change intracellular calcium concentration, suggesting there was no additional net increase in contractile stress inside the cell. We found that following disruption of MTs the increase in traction and strain energy varied with the degree of cell spreading: as the cell projected areas increased from 500 micrometer 2 to about 1800 micrometer 2, the percent increase in tractions decreased from 80% to about a few percent and the percent increase in strain energy decreased from 200% to almost zero percent, indicating the portion of the prestress balanced by MTs decreased as the cells increased spreading. These findings demonstrate that complementary role of the extracellular matrix and the MTs in balancing the prestress is controlled by the degree of cell spreading.

[1]  A. Harris,et al.  Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. , 1980, Science.

[2]  R. Panettieri,et al.  A human airway smooth muscle cell line that retains physiological responsiveness. , 1989, The American journal of physiology.

[3]  G W Brodland,et al.  Intermediate filaments may prevent buckling of compressively loaded microtubules. , 1990, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  L. Amos,et al.  Molecules of the cytoskeleton , 1991 .

[5]  D. Ingber,et al.  Cellular tensegrity : defining new rules of biological design that govern the cytoskeleton , 2022 .

[6]  J. Howard,et al.  Flexural rigidity of microtubules and actin filaments measured from thermal fluctuations in shape , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[7]  D E Ingber,et al.  Control of cytoskeletal mechanics by extracellular matrix, cell shape, and mechanical tension. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[8]  J J Fredberg,et al.  Pharmacological activation changes stiffness of cultured human airway smooth muscle cells. , 1996, The American journal of physiology.

[9]  E. Salmon,et al.  Actomyosin-based Retrograde Flow of Microtubules in the Lamella of Migrating Epithelial Cells Influences Microtubule Dynamic Instability and Turnover and Is Associated with Microtubule Breakage and Treadmilling , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[10]  K. Fujiwara,et al.  Isolation and contraction of the stress fiber. , 1998, Molecular biology of the cell.

[11]  R G Dennis,et al.  Microtubule assembly is regulated by externally applied strain in cultured smooth muscle cells. , 1998, Journal of cell science.

[12]  Ning Wang,et al.  Is cytoskeletal tension a major determinant of cell deformability in adherent endothelial cells? , 1998, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[13]  D. Ingber,et al.  Regulation of cytoskeletal mechanics and cell growth by myosin light chain phosphorylation. , 1998, The American journal of physiology.

[14]  M. Dembo,et al.  Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[15]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Patterning Mammalian Cells Using Elastomeric Membranes , 2000 .

[16]  D. Ingber,et al.  Opposing views on tensegrity as a structural framework for understanding cell mechanics. , 2000, Journal of applied physiology.

[17]  M. Dembo,et al.  Substrate flexibility regulates growth and apoptosis of normal but not transformed cells. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[18]  D Stamenović,et al.  Contribution of intermediate filaments to cell stiffness, stiffening, and growth. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[19]  Yu-Li Wang,et al.  Tensile stress stimulates microtubule outgrowth in living cells. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[20]  Dimitrije Stamenović,et al.  Cell prestress. II. Contribution of microtubules. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[21]  C. Waterman-Storer,et al.  Converging Populations of F-Actin Promote Breakage of Associated Microtubules to Spatially Regulate Microtubule Turnover in Migrating Cells , 2002, Current Biology.

[22]  D. Stamenović,et al.  Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[23]  Ning Wang,et al.  Spatial and temporal traction response in human airway smooth muscle cells. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[24]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Traction fields, moments, and strain energy that cells exert on their surroundings. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[25]  D. Ingber Tensegrity I. Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[26]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Intracellular stress tomography reveals stress focusing and structural anisotropy in cytoskeleton of living cells. , 2003, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.