Scaling laws of marine predator search behaviour

Many free-ranging predators have to make foraging decisions with little, if any, knowledge of present resource distribution and availability. The optimal search strategy they should use to maximize encounter rates with prey in heterogeneous natural environments remains a largely unresolved issue in ecology. Lévy walks are specialized random walks giving rise to fractal movement trajectories that may represent an optimal solution for searching complex landscapes. However, the adaptive significance of this putative strategy in response to natural prey distributions remains untested. Here we analyse over a million movement displacements recorded from animal-attached electronic tags to show that diverse marine predators—sharks, bony fishes, sea turtles and penguins—exhibit Lévy-walk-like behaviour close to a theoretical optimum. Prey density distributions also display Lévy-like fractal patterns, suggesting response movements by predators to prey distributions. Simulations show that predators have higher encounter rates when adopting Lévy-type foraging in natural-like prey fields compared with purely random landscapes. This is consistent with the hypothesis that observed search patterns are adapted to observed statistical patterns of the landscape. This may explain why Lévy-like behaviour seems to be widespread among diverse organisms, from microbes to humans, as a ‘rule’ that evolved in response to patchy resource distributions.

[1]  D. Mackas,et al.  Spectral Analysis of Zooplankton Spatial Heterogeneity , 1979, Science.

[2]  Chris Chatfield,et al.  The Analysis of Time Series , 1990 .

[3]  R. Glassman AN EVOLUTIONARY HYPOTHESIS ABOUT TEACHING AND PROSELYTIZING BEHAVIORS , 1980 .

[4]  P. A. Prince,et al.  Lévy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses , 1996, Nature.

[5]  M. Levandowsky,et al.  Chemosensory Responses of Acanthamoeba castellanii: Visual Analysis of Random Movement and Responses to Chemical Signals , 1996, The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology.

[6]  E. Pianka,et al.  Animal foraging: past, present and future. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  D. Sims,et al.  Selective foraging behaviour of basking sharks on zooplankton in a small-scale front , 1998, Nature.

[8]  H. Stanley,et al.  Optimizing the success of random searches , 1999, Nature.

[9]  H. Stanley,et al.  Lévy flights in random searches , 2000 .

[10]  F Bartumeus,et al.  Optimizing the encounter rate in biological interactions: Lévy versus Brownian strategies. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[11]  F. Bartumeus,et al.  Helical Lévy walks: Adjusting searching statistics to resource availability in microzooplankton , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  M. Hindell,et al.  Loyalty pays: potential life history consequences of fidelity to marine foraging regions by southern elephant seals , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  J. Steele The ocean ‘landscape’ , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[14]  Harry R. Burton,et al.  Resource partitioning through oceanic segregation of foraging juvenile southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina) , 2004, Oecologia.

[15]  George L. Hunt,et al.  Foraging in a fractal environment: Spatial patterns in a marine predator-prey system , 1992, Landscape Ecology.

[16]  D. Holdstock Past, present--and future? , 2005, Medicine, conflict, and survival.

[17]  Frederic Bartumeus,et al.  ANIMAL SEARCH STRATEGIES: A QUANTITATIVE RANDOM‐WALK ANALYSIS , 2005 .

[18]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  Trends and perspectives in animal‐attached remote sensing , 2005 .

[19]  Mark W. Wilson,et al.  Jellyfish aggregations and leatherback turtle foraging patterns in a temperate coastal environment. , 2006, Ecology.

[20]  Germinal Cocho,et al.  Scale-free foraging by primates emerges from their interaction with a complex environment , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  Andrew S. Brierley,et al.  Use of moored acoustic instruments to measure short‐term variability in abundance of Antarctic krill , 2006 .

[22]  Andrew E. Myers,et al.  Do leatherback turtles Dermochelys coriacea forage during the breeding season? A combination of data-logging devices provide new insights , 2006 .

[23]  Anthony J Richardson,et al.  Encounter success of free-ranging marine predator movements across a dynamic prey landscape , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  Deanelle T. Symonds,et al.  Fish Population and Behavior Revealed by Instantaneous Continental Shelf-Scale Imaging , 2006, Science.

[25]  T. Geisel,et al.  The scaling laws of human travel , 2006, Nature.

[26]  Clive R. McMahon,et al.  Thermal niche, large‐scale movements and implications of climate change for a critically endangered marine vertebrate , 2006 .

[27]  D. Sims,et al.  Minimizing errors in identifying Lévy flight behaviour of organisms. , 2007, The Journal of animal ecology.

[28]  A. M. Edwards,et al.  Revisiting Lévy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses, bumblebees and deer , 2007, Nature.

[29]  Frederic Bartumeus,et al.  LÉVY PROCESSES IN ANIMAL MOVEMENT: AN EVOLUTIONARY HYPOTHESIS , 2007 .

[30]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  How many animals really do the Lévy walk? , 2008, Ecology.

[31]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.