Current Concepts for Selecting the Location, Size and Shape of Defibrillation Electrodes

Defibrillation would be improved if the shock strength could be decreased. Decreasing shock strength would lessen the chance that the shock itself could damage the heart. With implantable defibrillators, some patients cannot be defibrillated even with the defibrillator at its highest setting; if the shock strength required for defibrillation were sufficiently lowered to bring the required shock voltage into the range of the device, these patients could be defibrillated. Decreasing shock strength requirements would increase the life of the batteries or would allow tbe use of smaller implanted devices. Since the time to charge tbe capacitors would be reduced, it would also shorten the interval until tbe shock was delivered and, hence, decrease the time that tbe patient was without blood flow during fibrillation. Tbe primary variables tbat can be altered to attempt to lower tbe shock strength required for defibrillation include those dealing with the shock waveform, including duration, polarity, and wavesbape, and tbose involving tbe sbock electrodes, including materials of construction, size, shape, and location. This article is concerned witb the last three of tbese variables. It discusses the basic principles, as they are understood today,

[1]  F. Abboud,et al.  Hemodynamic effects of ventricular defibrillation. , 1970, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[2]  J. Spear,et al.  Patterns of Ventricular Activity During Catheter Defibrillation , 1974, Circulation.

[3]  G A Ewy,et al.  Myocardial Necrosis from Direct Current Countershock: Effect of Paddle Electrode Size and Time Interval Between Discharges , 1974, Circulation.

[4]  D P Zipes,et al.  Termination of ventricular fibrillation in dogs by depolarizing a critical amount of myocardium. , 1975, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  G. Ewy,et al.  Effectiveness of direct current defibrillation: role of paddle electrode size. , 1977, American heart journal.

[6]  G. Ewy,et al.  Effectiveness of direct current defibrillation: role of paddle electrode size: II. , 1977, American heart journal.

[7]  S. Rush,et al.  Response of cultured myocardial cells to countershock-type electric field stimulation. , 1978, The American journal of physiology.

[8]  S. Rush,et al.  Local potential gradients as a unifying measure for thresholds of stimulation, standstill, tachyarrhythmia and fibrillation appearing after strong capacitor discharges. , 1978, Advances in cardiology.

[9]  V. Negovsky,et al.  Criteria of efficiency and safety of the defibrillating impulse. , 1980, Resuscitation.

[10]  J. Jones,et al.  Determination of safety factor for defibrillator waveforms in cultured heart cells. , 1982, The American journal of physiology.

[11]  R E Jones,et al.  Improved defibrillator waveform safety factor with biphasic waveforms. , 1983, The American journal of physiology.

[12]  A. Villanueva,et al.  Effect of defibrillation energy on pacing threshold. , 1983, Medical instrumentation.

[13]  S. Bach,et al.  Measurement of cardioversion/defibrillation thresholds in man by a truncated exponential waveform and an apical patch-superior vena caval spring electrode configuration. , 1984, Circulation.

[14]  G. Klein,et al.  Improved internal defibrillation with twin pulse sequential energy delivery to different lead orientations in pigs. , 1985, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  P. D. Chapman,et al.  The implanted defibrillator: relation of defibrillating lead configuration and clinical variables to defibrillation threshold. , 1985, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  P D Wolf,et al.  The potential gradient field created by epicardial defibrillation electrodes in dogs. , 1986, Circulation.

[17]  D. Zipes,et al.  Double and triple sequential shocks reduce ventricular defibrillation threshold in dogs with and without myocardial infarction. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  P D Wolf,et al.  Improved defibrillation thresholds with large contoured epicardial electrodes and biphasic waveforms. , 1987, Circulation.

[19]  W. Krassowska,et al.  Periodic Conductivity as a Mechanism for Cardiac Stimulation and Defibrillation , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  J. Lowe,et al.  A New Sock Electrode for Recording Epicardial Activation from the Human Heart: One Size Fits All , 1987, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[21]  F. Witkowski,et al.  Relation of defibrillatory potential minima to post-defibrillatory activation , 1988, Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[22]  J B Martins,et al.  Energy, current, and success in defibrillation and cardioversion: clinical studies using an automated impedance-based method of energy adjustment. , 1988, Circulation.

[23]  V. Parsonnet,et al.  Implantation of a cardioverter/defibrillator without thoracotomy using a triple electrode system. , 1988, JAMA.

[24]  F. J. Claydon,et al.  Measurement of defibrillation shock potential distributions and activation sequences of the heart in three dimensions , 1988, Proc. IEEE.

[25]  P. Wolf,et al.  Extracellular field required for excitation in three-dimensional anisotropic canine myocardium. , 1988, Circulation research.

[26]  B B Lerman,et al.  Current-based versus energy-based ventricular defibrillation: a prospective study. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  R. Ideker,et al.  Comparison of the internal defibrillation thresholds for monophasic and double and single capacitor biphasic waveforms. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  P. Wolf,et al.  Stimulus-induced critical point. Mechanism for electrical initiation of reentry in normal canine myocardium. , 1989, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[29]  N. G. Sepulveda,et al.  Current injection into a two-dimensional anisotropic bidomain. , 1989, Biophysical journal.

[30]  R E Ideker,et al.  Ventricular defibrillation using biphasic waveforms: the importance of phasic duration. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[31]  H. E. Stephenson,et al.  Adverse effects of permanent cardiac internal defibrillator patches on external defibrillation. , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.

[32]  R Plonsey,et al.  Mechanism of cardiac defibrillation in open-chest dogs with unipolar DC-coupled simultaneous activation and shock potential recordings. , 1990, Circulation.

[33]  W. Krassowska,et al.  Potential distribution in three-dimensional periodic myocardium. II. Application to extracellular stimulation , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  P. Wolf,et al.  Conduction disturbances caused by high current density electric fields. , 1990, Circulation research.

[35]  B. Lerman,et al.  Effect of epicardial patch electrodes on transthoracic defibrillation. , 1990, Circulation.

[36]  M. Oeff,et al.  [Electrical defibrillation]. , 1992, Der Internist.