Critical incident reports concerning anaesthetic equipment: analysis of the UK National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) data from 2006–2008 *

Anaesthetic equipment plays a central role in anaesthetic practice but brings the potential for malfunction or misuse. We aimed to explore the national picture by reviewing patient safety incidents relating to anaesthetic equipment from the National Reporting and Learning System for England and Wales between 2006 and 2008. We searched the database using the system’s own classification and by scrutinising the free text of relevant incidents. There were 1029 relevant incidents. Of these, 410 (39.8%) concerned patient monitoring, most commonly screen failure during anaesthesia, failure of one modality or failure to transfer data automatically from anaesthetic room to operating theatre. Problems relating to ventilators made up 185 (17.9%) of the reports. Sudden failures during anaesthesia accounted for 142 (13.8%) of these, with a further 10 cases (0.9%) where malfunction caused a sustained or increasing positive pressure in the patient’s airway. Leaks made up 99 (9.6%) of incidents and 53 (5.2%) of incidents arose from the use of infusion pumps. Most (89%) of the incidents caused no patient harm; only 30 (2.9%) were judged to have led to moderate or severe harm. Although equipment was often faulty, user error or unfamiliarity also played a part. A large variety of causes led to a relatively small number of clinical scenarios, that anaesthetists should be ready, both individually and organisationally, to manage even when the cause is not apparent. We make recommendations for enhancing patient safety with respect to equipment.

[1]  N. Stanhope,et al.  An evaluation of adverse incident reporting. , 1999, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[2]  S. Fasting,et al.  Equipment problems during anaesthesia--are they a quality problem? , 2002, British journal of anaesthesia.

[3]  Robert A. Caplan,et al.  Adverse Anesthetic Outcomes Arising from Gas Delivery Equipment: A Closed Claims Analysis , 1997, Anesthesiology.

[4]  A. Smith,et al.  Involving users in the design of a system for sharing lessons from adverse incidents in anaesthesia , 2006, Anaesthesia.

[5]  P Demoly,et al.  Hypersensitivity reactions to blood components: document issued by the allergy committee of the French medicines and healthcare products regulatory agency. , 2011, Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology.

[6]  A. N. Thomas,et al.  Medication‐related patient safety incidents in critical care: a review of reports to the UK National Patient Safety Agency * , 2008, Anaesthesia.

[7]  Andrew F Smith,et al.  An analysis of critical incidents relevant to pediatric anesthesia reported to the UK National Reporting and Learning System, 2006–2008 , 2011, Paediatric anaesthesia.

[8]  A. Merry Safety in anaesthesia: reporting incidents and learning from them , 2008, Anaesthesia.

[9]  R S Newbower,et al.  Preventable anesthesia mishaps: a study of human factors* , 1978, Anesthesiology.

[10]  M Koutantji,et al.  Feedback from incident reporting: information and action to improve patient safety , 2009, Quality & Safety in Health Care.

[11]  M. Currie,et al.  A Prospective Survey of Anaesthetic Critical Events in a Teaching Hospital , 1989, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[12]  R Shaw,et al.  Adverse events and near miss reporting in the NHS , 2005, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[13]  A. Smith,et al.  Patient safety incidents involving neuromuscular blockade: analysis of the UK National Reporting and Learning System data from 2006 to 2008 , 2010, Anaesthesia.

[14]  B. McGrath,et al.  Patient safety incidents associated with airway devices in critical care: a review of reports to the UK National Patient Safety Agency , 2008, Anaesthesia.

[15]  C. Pope,et al.  Adverse events in anaesthetic practice: qualitative study of definition, discussion and reporting. , 2006, British journal of anaesthesia.

[16]  R S Newbower,et al.  An Analysis of Major Errors and Equipment Failures in Anesthesia Management: Considerations for Prevention and Detection , 1984, Anesthesiology.

[17]  T. Clutton-Brock,et al.  Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland , 1984 .

[18]  A. Sellen,et al.  Human Failure: An Analysis of 2000 Incident Reports , 1993, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[19]  J. Spierdijk,et al.  Reported significant observations during anaesthesia: a prospective analysis over an 18-month period. , 1992, British journal of anaesthesia.

[20]  C. Pope,et al.  Making monitoring ‘work’: human–machine interaction and patient safety in anaesthesia , 2003, Anaesthesia.

[21]  T. Heier,et al.  Awareness in anaesthesia: Incidence, consequences and prevention , 1996, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[22]  W J Russell,et al.  Equipment Failure: An Analysis of 2000 Incident Reports , 1993 .

[23]  A. Thomas,et al.  Patient safety incidents associated with equipment in critical care: a review of reports to the UK National Patient Safety Agency , 2008, Anaesthesia.

[24]  A. Smith,et al.  National critical incident reporting: improving patient safety. , 2009, British journal of anaesthesia.

[25]  C. J. Cassidy,et al.  Critical incident reports concerning anaesthetic equipment: Analysis of the UK National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) data from 2006: 1AP1-4 , 2008 .

[26]  A Smith,et al.  Promoting patient safety through prospective risk identification: example from peri-operative care , 2010, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[27]  N. Stanhope,et al.  Reasons for not reporting adverse incidents: an empirical study. , 1999, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[28]  K. Catchpole,et al.  Safety in anaesthesia: a study of 12 606 reported incidents from the UK National Reporting and Learning System , 2008, Anaesthesia.

[29]  W. Chau-in,et al.  The Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study) of anesthetic equipment failure/malfunction: a qualitative analysis for risk factors. , 2005, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.