Assessing the Cost of Global Biodiversity and Conservation Knowledge

Knowledge products comprise assessments of authoritative information supported by standards, governance, quality control, data, tools, and capacity building mechanisms. Considerable resources are dedicated to developing and maintaining knowledge products for biodiversity conservation, and they are widely used to inform policy and advise decision makers and practitioners. However, the financial cost of delivering this information is largely undocumented. We evaluated the costs and funding sources for developing and maintaining four global biodiversity and conservation knowledge products: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems, Protected Planet, and the World Database of Key Biodiversity Areas. These are secondary data sets, built on primary data collected by extensive networks of expert contributors worldwide. We estimate that US$160 million (range: US$116–204 million), plus 293 person-years of volunteer time (range: 278–308 person-years) valued at US$ 14 million (range US$12–16 million), were invested in these four knowledge products between 1979 and 2013. More than half of this financing was provided through philanthropy, and nearly three-quarters was spent on personnel costs. The estimated annual cost of maintaining data and platforms for three of these knowledge products (excluding the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems for which annual costs were not possible to estimate for 2013) is US$6.5 million in total (range: US$6.2–6.7 million). We estimated that an additional US$114 million will be needed to reach pre-defined baselines of data coverage for all the four knowledge products, and that once achieved, annual maintenance costs will be approximately US$12 million. These costs are much lower than those to maintain many other, similarly important, global knowledge products. Ensuring that biodiversity and conservation knowledge products are sufficiently up to date, comprehensive and accurate is fundamental to inform decision-making for biodiversity conservation and sustainable development. Thus, the development and implementation of plans for sustainable long-term financing for them is critical.

[1]  L. Joppa,et al.  Quantifying the relative irreplaceability of important bird and biodiversity areas , 2016, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[2]  H. Resit Akçakaya,et al.  Analysing biodiversity and conservation knowledge products to support regional environmental assessments , 2016, Scientific Data.

[3]  B. Collen,et al.  Toward equality of biodiversity knowledge through technology transfer , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[4]  George D. Gann,et al.  High proportion of cactus species threatened with extinction , 2015, Nature Plants.

[5]  Henrikki Tenkanen,et al.  Prospects and challenges for social media data in conservation science , 2015, Front. Environ. Sci..

[6]  C. Orme,et al.  Cost‐effective assessment of extinction risk with limited information , 2015 .

[7]  Simon N. Stuart,et al.  Harnessing biodiversity and conservation knowledge products to track the Aichi Targets and Sustainable Development Goals , 2015 .

[8]  A. Newton,et al.  Towards a Global Tree Assessment , 2015, Oryx.

[9]  Mark A. Burgman,et al.  The IUCN Red List of Ecosystems: Motivations, Challenges, and Applications , 2015 .

[10]  M. Spalding,et al.  A practical guide to the application of the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems criteria , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  M. C. Runge,et al.  How much is new information worth? Evaluating the financial benefit of resolving management uncertainty , 2015 .

[12]  Ailene K. Ettinger,et al.  Global change and local solutions: Tapping the unrealized potential of citizen science for biodiversity research , 2015 .

[13]  Ashish Kothari,et al.  NEW STEPS OF CHANGE: LOOKING BEYOND PROTECTED AREAS TO CONSIDER OTHER EFFECTIVE AREA-BASED CONSERVATION MEASURES , 2014 .

[14]  H. D. Cooper,et al.  A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets , 2014, Science.

[15]  P. Armsworth.  Inclusion of costs in conservation planning depends on limited datasets and hopeful assumptions , 2014, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Liana N. Joseph,et al.  Targeting Global Protected Area Expansion for Imperiled Biodiversity , 2014, PLoS biology.

[17]  N. Grassly,et al.  United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs/population Division , 2022 .

[18]  Walter G. Berendsohn,et al.  Strategies for the sustainability of online open-access biodiversity databases , 2014 .

[19]  L. Boitani,et al.  Update or Outdate: Long‐Term Viability of the IUCN Red List , 2014 .

[20]  Matt Walpole,et al.  Progress towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets: an assessment of biodiversity trends, policy scenarios and key actions , 2014 .

[21]  N. Dudley,et al.  Applications of key biodiversity areas : end-user consultations , 2014 .

[22]  Diego Juffe‐Bignoli,et al.  Biodiversity for business : A guide to using knowledge products delivered through IUCN , 2014 .

[23]  Millennium Development Goals report 2014. , 2014, Midwifery.

[24]  Mark A. Burgman,et al.  Scientific Foundations for an IUCN Red List of Ecosystems , 2013, PloS one.

[25]  J. Rockström,et al.  Policy: Sustainable development goals for people and planet , 2013, Nature.

[26]  R. Maloney,et al.  Financial Costs of Meeting Global Biodiversity Conservation Targets: Current Spending and Unmet Needs , 2012, Science.

[27]  Thomas E. Lacher,et al.  The IUCN global assessments: partnerships, collaboration and data sharing for biodiversity science and policy , 2012 .

[28]  T. Brooks,et al.  The identification of sites of biodiversity conservation significance: progress with the application of a global standard , 2012 .

[29]  Robert A. Holland,et al.  Conservation priorities for freshwater biodiversity: the key biodiversity area approach refined and tested for continental Africa , 2012 .

[30]  Marc Hockings,et al.  Protecting Important Sites for Biodiversity Contributes to Meeting Global Conservation Targets , 2012, PloS one.

[31]  W. G. Berendsohn,et al.  Biodiversity information platforms: From standards to interoperability , 2011, ZooKeys.

[32]  L. Salamon,et al.  Measuring the Economic Value of Volunteer Work Globally: Concepts, Estimates, and a Roadmap to the Future , 2011 .

[33]  L. Redd,et al.  International Union for Conservation of Nature , 2010, Permanent Missions to the United Nations, No. 309.

[34]  D. Pauly,et al.  Understanding the cost of establishing marine protected areas , 2011 .

[35]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  Mapping Human and Social Dimensions of Conservation Opportunity for the Scheduling of Conservation Action on Private Land , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[36]  Marc Hockings,et al.  A Global Analysis of Protected Area Management Effectiveness , 2010, Environmental management.

[37]  Alison J. Stattersfield,et al.  Tracking trends in key sites for biodiversity: a case study using Important Bird Areas in Kenya , 2010, Bird Conservation International.

[38]  D. E. Harrison,et al.  Implementation Plan for the Global Observing System for Climate in Support of the UNFCCC (2010 Update) , 2010 .

[39]  B. Collen,et al.  Barometer of life: sampling. , 2010, Science.

[40]  U. Gärdenfors.  Barometer of life: national red lists. , 2010, Science.

[41]  E. Wilson,et al.  The Barometer of Life , 2010, Science.

[42]  J. Rodríguez.  National Red Lists: the largest global market for IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria , 2008 .

[43]  T. Brooks,et al.  Conservation planning and the IUCN Red List , 2008 .

[44]  A. Millar,et al.  Key biodiversity areas as globally significant target sites for the conservation of marine biological diversity , 2008 .

[45]  N. Dudley.  Guidelines for applying protected area management categories , 2008 .

[46]  Contributions from M. Walpole.  The Millennium Development Goals Report , 2008 .

[47]  P. Langhammer.  Identification and Gap Analysis of Key Biodiversity Areas: Targets for Comprehensive Protected Area Systems , 2007 .

[48]  Michael Hoffmann,et al.  The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[49]  Michael Hoffmann,et al.  Pinpointing and preventing imminent extinctions. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  Gideon F. Smith,et al.  Plant Red Data List assessments in southern Africa : Financial costs of a collaborative regional project , 2005 .

[51]  A. Peterson,et al.  Biodiversity informatics: managing and applying primary biodiversity data. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[52]  K. Gaston,et al.  Can We Afford to Conserve Biodiversity? , 2001 .

[53]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Why biodiversity surveys are good value , 1999, Nature.