Risk of recurrence after chemoradiotherapy identified by multimodal MRI and 18F-FDG-PET/CT in locally advanced cervical cancer.
暂无分享,去创建一个
H. Lyng | G. Kristensen | K. Lindemann | T. Hompland | E. Malinen | A. Løndalen | K. Bruheim | E. Nakken | K. Skipar | Kjersti Vassmo Lund
[1] P. Grigsby,et al. Standardized Uptake Value for 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Is a Marker of Inflammatory State and Immune Infiltrate in Cervical Cancer , 2021, Clinical Cancer Research.
[2] C. Kirisits,et al. MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer (EMBRACE-I): a multicentre prospective cohort study. , 2021, The Lancet. Oncology.
[3] A. Kubiak,et al. Pretreatment [18F]FDG PET/CT Prognostic Factors in Patients with Squamous Cell Cervical Carcinoma FIGO IIIC1 , 2021, Diagnostics.
[4] J. Mountz,et al. Diagnostic Value of FDG PET/MRI in Females With Pelvic Malignancy—A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2020, Frontiers in Oncology.
[5] D. Georg,et al. Phantom-based quality assurance for multicenter quantitative MRI in locally advanced cervical cancer. , 2020, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[6] Bang-Bin Chen,et al. PET/MRI in Cervical Cancer: Associations Between Imaging Biomarkers and Tumor Stage, Disease Progression, and Overall Survival , 2020, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[7] T. Stokke,et al. MRI Distinguishes Tumor Hypoxia Levels of Different Prognostic and Biological Significance in Cervical Cancer , 2020, Cancer Research.
[8] H. Lyng,et al. Combining imaging- and gene-based hypoxia biomarkers in cervical cancer improves prediction of chemoradiotherapy failure independent of intratumour heterogeneity , 2020, medRxiv.
[9] E. Rofstad,et al. DCE-MRI of locally-advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix: Tofts analysis versus non-model-based analyses , 2020, Radiation oncology.
[10] Daniela Thorwarth,et al. Quantitative imaging for radiotherapy purposes , 2020, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[11] C. Fuller,et al. Volumetric assessment of apparent diffusion coefficient predicts outcome following chemoradiation for cervical cancer. , 2019, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[12] O. Sabri,et al. Cervical Cancer: Associations between Metabolic Parameters and Whole Lesion Histogram Analysis Derived from Simultaneous 18F-FDG-PET/MRI , 2018, Contrast media & molecular imaging.
[13] H. Lyng,et al. Combined MR Imaging of Oxygen Consumption and Supply Reveals Tumor Hypoxia and Aggressiveness in Prostate Cancer Patients. , 2018, Cancer research.
[14] Kathryn J Fowler,et al. Spatial relationship of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]-fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance diffusion imaging metrics in cervical cancer , 2018, EJNMMI Research.
[15] Christian Kirisits,et al. Physician assessed and patient reported urinary morbidity after radio-chemotherapy and image guided adaptive brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. , 2018, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[16] Christian Kirisits,et al. Bowel morbidity following radiochemotherapy and image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for cervical cancer: Physician- and patient reported outcome from the EMBRACE study. , 2018, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[17] S. Fanti,et al. Prognostic Impact of Pretreatment Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography SUVmax in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer , 2018, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.
[18] M. Thakur,et al. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery Versus Concomitant Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy in Patients With Stage IB2, IIA, or IIB Squamous Cervical Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[19] Christian Kirisits,et al. The EMBRACE II study: The outcome and prospect of two decades of evolution within the GEC-ESTRO GYN working group and the EMBRACE studies , 2018, Clinical and translational radiation oncology.
[20] H. Lyng,et al. Hypoxia in cervical cancer: from biology to imaging , 2017, Clinical and Translational Imaging.
[21] Richard Pötter,et al. Changes in Tumor Biology During Chemoradiation of Cervix Cancer Assessed by Multiparametric MRI and Hypoxia PET , 2017, Molecular Imaging and Biology.
[22] N. Datta,et al. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs. radiotherapy alone in locally advanced cervix cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2017, Gynecologic oncology.
[23] L. Kershaw,et al. The prognostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI contrast agent transfer constant Ktrans in cervical cancer is explained by plasma flow rather than vessel permeability , 2017, British Journal of Cancer.
[24] S. Purz,et al. Parameters of simultaneous 18F-FDG-PET/MRI predict tumor stage and several histopathological features in uterine cervical cancer , 2017, Oncotarget.
[25] H. Pu,et al. Can Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predict Survival in Patients with Cervical Cancer? A Meta-Analysis. , 2016, European journal of radiology.
[26] C. Ménard,et al. A prospective study of DWI, DCE-MRI and FDG PET imaging for target delineation in brachytherapy for cervical cancer. , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[27] J. Overgaard,et al. The impact of hypoxia and its modification of the outcome of radiotherapy , 2016, Journal of radiation research.
[28] F. Lucchesi,et al. Pre-treatment MRI minimum apparent diffusion coefficient value is a potential prognostic imaging biomarker in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation , 2016, BMC Cancer.
[29] Wolfgang Wadsak,et al. Multiparametric [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose/ [18F]Fluoromisonidazole Positron Emission Tomography/ Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer for the Non-Invasive Detection of Tumor Heterogeneity: A Pilot Study , 2016, PloS one.
[30] A. Fyles,et al. Association of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient with Disease Recurrence in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Treated with Radical Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy. , 2016, Radiology.
[31] C. Stokke,et al. Short-course PET based simultaneous integrated boost for locally advanced cervical cancer , 2016, Radiation oncology.
[32] O. Couturier,et al. For avid glucose tumors, the SUV peak is the most reliable parameter for [18F]FDG-PET/CT quantification, regardless of acquisition time , 2016, EJNMMI Research.
[33] H. Chung,et al. Prognostic Implications of the SUVmax of Primary Tumors and Metastatic Lymph Node Measured by 18F-FDG PET in Patients With Uterine Cervical Cancer: A Meta-analysis , 2016, Clinical nuclear medicine.
[34] P. Brandmaier,et al. Simultaneous [18F]FDG-PET/MRI: Correlation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) in Primary and Recurrent Cervical Cancer , 2015, PloS one.
[35] Thomas E Yankeelov,et al. Correlation of tumor characteristics derived from DCE‐MRI and DW‐MRI with histology in murine models of breast cancer , 2015, NMR in biomedicine.
[36] M. Forsting,et al. Integrated PET/MRI for whole-body staging of patients with primary cervical cancer: preliminary results , 2015, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[37] J. Robbins,et al. PET/CT and MRI in the imaging assessment of cervical cancer , 2015, Abdominal Imaging.
[38] Heidi Lyng,et al. Pharmacokinetic parameters derived from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of cervical cancers predict chemoradiotherapy outcome. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[39] Heidi Lyng,et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of cervical cancers: temporal percentile screening of contrast enhancement identifies parameters for prediction of chemoradioresistance. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[40] Y. Liu,et al. Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Uterine Cervical Cancer , 2009, Journal of computer assisted tomography.
[41] F. Gilbert,et al. A combined pharmacokinetic and radiologic assessment of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging predicts response to chemoradiation in locally advanced cervical cancer. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[42] P. Grigsby. The prognostic value of PET and PET/CT in cervical cancer , 2008, Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society.
[43] P. Grigsby,et al. The standardized uptake value for F‐18 fluorodeoxyglucose is a sensitive predictive biomarker for cervical cancer treatment response and survival , 2007, Cancer.
[44] Jens Overgaard,et al. Hypoxic radiosensitization: adored and ignored. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[45] D. Hedley,et al. Tumor hypoxia has independent predictor impact only in patients with node-negative cervix cancer. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[46] H. Lyng,et al. Treatment outcome in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: relationships to pretreatment tumor oxygenation and vascularization. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[47] P Vaupel,et al. Association between tumor hypoxia and malignant progression in advanced cancer of the uterine cervix. , 1996, Cancer research.
[48] P. Tofts. Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd‐DTPA MR imaging , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.