Nonlinear acceleration of coupled fluid–structure transient thermal problems by Anderson mixing

SUMMARY Conjugate heat-transfer problems are typically solved using partitioned methods where fluid and solid subdomains are evaluated separately by dedicated solvers coupled through a common boundary. Strongly coupled schemes for transient analysis require fluid and solid problems to be solved many times each time step until convergence to a steady state. In many practical situations, a fairly simple and frequently employed fixed-point iteration process is rather ineffective; it leads to a large number of iterations per time step and consequently to long simulation times. In this article, Anderson mixing is proposed as a fixed-point convergence acceleration technique to reduce computational cost of thermal coupled fluid–solid problems. A number of other recently published methods with applications to similar fluid–structure interaction problems are also reviewed and analyzed. Numerical experiments are presented to illustrate relative performance of these methods on a test problem of rotating pre-swirl cavity air flow interacting with a turbine disk. It is observed that performance of Anderson mixing method is superior to that of other algorithms in terms of total iteration counts. Additional computational savings are demonstrated by reusing information from previously solved time steps. Copyright © All rights reserved 2012 Rolls-Royce plc.

[1]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  Enabling Fluid-Structural Strong Thermal Coupling Within a Multi-Physics Environment , 2006 .

[2]  Shinobu Yoshimura,et al.  Performance evaluation of nonlinear algorithms with line‐search for partitioned coupling techniques for fluid–structure interactions , 2010 .

[3]  Miguel Angel Fernández,et al.  A Newton method using exact jacobians for solving fluid-structure coupling , 2005 .

[4]  Hermann G. Matthies,et al.  Algorithms for strong coupling procedures , 2006 .

[5]  Dieter Dinkler,et al.  A simultaneous solution procedure for strong interactions of generalized Newtonian fluids and viscoelastic solids at large strains , 2005 .

[6]  Ekkehard Ramm,et al.  Strong coupling schemes for interaction of thin‐walled structures and incompressible flows , 2011 .

[7]  Michael B. Giles,et al.  Stability analysis of numerical interface conditions in fluid-structure thermal analysis , 1997 .

[8]  Arun Pandy,et al.  Fixed‐point convergence of modular, steady‐state heat transfer models coupling multiple scales and phenomena for melt–crystal growth , 2006 .

[9]  van Eh Harald Brummelen,et al.  Partitioned iterative solution methods for fluid–structure interaction , 2011 .

[10]  N. J. Hills,et al.  Coupled Fluid/Solid Heat Transfer Computation for Turbine Discs , 2001 .

[11]  C. Farhat,et al.  Partitioned procedures for the transient solution of coupled aroelastic problems Part I: Model problem, theory and two-dimensional application , 1995 .

[12]  Yousef Saad,et al.  Two classes of multisecant methods for nonlinear acceleration , 2009, Numer. Linear Algebra Appl..

[13]  Philippe H. Geubelle,et al.  Stability of fluid–structure thermal simulations on moving grids , 2007 .

[14]  Andrew Yeckel,et al.  An approximate block Newton method for coupled iterations of nonlinear solvers: Theory and conjugate heat transfer applications , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[15]  Tom Verstraete,et al.  Numerical Study of the Heat Transfer in Micro Gas Turbines , 2007 .

[16]  Donald G. M. Anderson Iterative Procedures for Nonlinear Integral Equations , 1965, JACM.

[17]  John W Chew,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics for turbomachinery internal air systems , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[18]  van Eh Harald Brummelen,et al.  An interface Newton–Krylov solver for fluid–structure interaction , 2005 .

[19]  Homer F. Walker,et al.  Anderson Acceleration for Fixed-Point Iterations , 2011, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[20]  W. Wall,et al.  Fixed-point fluid–structure interaction solvers with dynamic relaxation , 2008 .

[21]  D. Keyes,et al.  Jacobian-free Newton-Krylov methods: a survey of approaches and applications , 2004 .

[22]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Partitioned analysis of coupled mechanical systems , 2001 .

[23]  Homer F. Walker,et al.  Choosing the Forcing Terms in an Inexact Newton Method , 1996, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[24]  René de Borst,et al.  An investigation of Interface-GMRES(R) for fluid–structure interaction problems with flutter and divergence , 2011 .

[25]  Nicholas J. Hills,et al.  3D Fluid–Solid Heat Transfer Coupling of an Aero Engine Pre-Swirl System , 2005 .

[26]  José Mario Martínez,et al.  Practical quasi-Newton methods for solving nonlinear systems , 2000 .