The Market for Electric Vehicles: Indirect Network Effects and Policy Design

The market for plug-in electric vehicles (EVs) exhibits indirect network effects due to the interdependence between EV adoption and charging station investment. Through a stylized model, we demonstrate that indirect network effects on both sides of the market lead to feedback loops that could alter the diffusion process of the new technology. Based on quarterly EV sales and charging station deployment in 353 metro areas from 2011 to 2013, our empirical analysis finds indirect network effects on both sides of the market, with those on the EV demand side being stronger. The federal income tax credit of up to $7,500 for EV buyers contributed to about 40% of EV sales during 2011-13, with feedback loops explaining 40% of that increase. A policy of equal-sized spending but subsidizing charging station deployment could have been more than twice as effective in promoting EV adoption.

[1]  H. Herzog.  Who Benefits from State and Local Economic Development Policies , 1992 .

[2]  J. Sallee.  The Surprising Incidence of Tax Credits for the Toyota Prius , 2011 .

[3]  Marc Rysman,et al.  Competition between Networks: A Study of the Market for Yellow Pages , 2002 .

[4]  E. Muehlegger,et al.  Consumer Learning and Hybrid Vehicle Adoption , 2015 .

[5]  Matthew E. Kahn.  Do greens drive Hummers or hybrids? Environmental ideology as a determinant of consumer choice , 2007 .

[6]  Steven T. Berry.  Estimating Discrete-Choice Models of Product Differentiation , 1994 .

[7]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation , 1985 .

[8]  Yiyi Zhou,et al.  Failure to Launch in Two-Sided Markets: A Study of the U.S. Video Game Market , 2017 .

[9]  S. Borenstein,et al.  Designing policy incentives for cleaner technologies: Lessons from California's plug-in electric vehicle rebate program , 2017 .

[10]  J. Rochet,et al.  Two-sided markets: a progress report , 2006 .

[11]  Building out alternative fuel retail infrastructure: Government fleet spillovers in E85 , 2009 .

[12]  Neil Gandal,et al.  The Dynamics of Technological Adoption in Hardware/Software Systems , 1997 .

[13]  Mara Lederman,et al.  Software Exclusivity and the Scope of Indirect Network Effects in the U.S. Home Video Game Market , 2007 .

[14]  Nicholas Z. Muller,et al.  Are There Environmental Benefits from Driving Electric Vehicles? The Importance of Local Factors , 2016 .

[15]  K. Small,et al.  Does Britain or the United States Have the Right Gasoline Tax , 2005 .

[16]  Matthew T. Clements,et al.  Indirect Network Effects and the Product Cycle: Video Games in the U.S., 1994-2002 , 2004 .

[17]  Steven E. Sexton,et al.  Conspicuous conservation: The Prius halo and willingness to pay for environmental bona fides , 2014 .

[18]  Peter Mock,et al.  A GLOBAL COMPARISON OF FISCAL INCENTIVE POLICY FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES , 2014 .

[19]  Thomas H. Klier,et al.  New Vehicle Characteristics and the Cost of the Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standard , 2008 .

[20]  Robin S. Lee.  Vertical Integration and Exclusivity in Platform and Two-Sided Markets , 2013 .

[21]  Shanjun Li,et al.  Gasoline Prices, Government Support, and the Demand for Hybrid Vehicles in the U.S. , 2009 .

[22]  Matthew E. Kahn,et al.  Green Market Geography: The Spatial Clustering of Hybrid Vehicles and LEED Registered Buildings , 2009 .

[23]  Harikesh S. Nair,et al.  Empirical Analysis of Indirect Network Effects in the Market for Personal Digital Assistants , 2004 .

[24]  Steven T. Berry,et al.  Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium , 1995 .

[25]  Christian Delbert,et al.  Federal Tax Credits for the Purchase of Electric Vehicles , 2012 .

[26]  Andrei Hagiu.  Pricing and commitment by two‐sided platforms , 2006 .

[27]  M. Armstrong.  Competition in Two-Sided Markets ¤ , 2005 .

[28]  Jeffrey H. Rohlfs.  A theory of interdependent demand for a communications service , 1974 .

[29]  K. S. Gallagher,et al.  Giving Green to Get Green: Incentives and Consumer Adoption of Hybrid Vehicle Technology , 2008 .

[30]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Integration of renewable energy into the transport and electricity sectors through V2G , 2008 .

[31]  B. Caillaud,et al.  Chicken & Egg: Competition Among Intermediation Service Providers , 2003 .

[32]  Neil Gandal,et al.  Indirect Network Effects and Adoption Externalities , 2002 .

[33]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry , 2005 .

[34]  Ashley Langer,et al.  Fueling Alternatives : Evidence from Naturalistic Driving Data , 2013 .

[35]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[36]  Cristian Huse.  Fast and Furious (and Dirty): How Asymmetric Regulation May Hinder Environmental Policy , 2014 .

[37]  Paul Stoneman,et al.  Technology Diffusion and Public Policy , 1994 .

[38]  Alisha C. Holland,et al.  A Price Theory of Multi-Sided Platforms , 2009 .

[39]  Stephen E. Margolis,et al.  ARE NETWORK EXTERNALITIES A NEW SOURCE OF MARKET FAILURE , 1995 .