Managing digital knowledge for ensuring business efficiency and continuity

Purpose Today many firms are pushed towards digitalization to ensure business continuity and their survival due to COVID-19. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the emerging knowledge management models in the era of digitalization and disruption. Design/methodology/approach The authors have adopted a semi-structured approach composed of qualitative data collection from 37 business executives from India representing different industry sectors. The authors adopted a three-layer coding process (axial, open and selective) to develop a framework grounded in organizational information processing theory. Findings Scanning the business environment leads to understand the status of current and potential business through intelligence of information, whereas better planning and execution can be achieved through employing and using the information intelligently that fits to the overall and strategic objective of the business. Overall, the business continuity can be obtained by information prosperity across the business by engaging diverse stakeholders. According to the findings, these aspects lead to the effective implementation of digital knowledge to ensure business continuity in uncertain business environment. Practical implications The study offers the insights for managing and executing the knowledge in digital platforms, where they can think of developing a system architecture on the basis of degree of uncertainty and information processing requirements for combining the knowledge. Originality/value The present study is unique, where it offers the meaningful visions to the designers and users of virtual knowledge management systems.

[1]  C. Jabbour,et al.  Health-care information technologies for dispersed knowledge management , 2021, J. Knowl. Manag..

[2]  Honglei Li,et al.  The co-evolution of knowledge management and business model transformation in the post-COVID-19 era: insights based on Chinese e-commerce companies , 2021, J. Knowl. Manag..

[3]  Nan Wang,et al.  The influence mechanism of rewards on knowledge sharing behaviors in virtual communities , 2021, J. Knowl. Manag..

[4]  Dirk Meissner,et al.  The intertwining of knowledge sharing and creation in the digital platform based ecosystem. A conceptual study on the lens of the open innovation approach , 2021, J. Knowl. Manag..

[5]  Sarra Berraies,et al.  Distributed leadership and exploratory and exploitative innovations: mediating roles of tacit and explicit knowledge sharing and organizational trust , 2020, J. Knowl. Manag..

[6]  C. Jabbour,et al.  Challenges for developing health-care knowledge in the digital age , 2020, J. Knowl. Manag..

[7]  Sandeep Goyal,et al.  Does the source of external knowledge matter? Examining the role of customer co-creation and partner sourcing in knowledge creation and innovation , 2020, Inf. Manag..

[8]  Thanos Papadopoulos,et al.  The use of digital technologies by small and medium enterprises during COVID-19: Implications for theory and practice , 2020, International Journal of Information Management.

[9]  Priya Seetharaman,et al.  Business models shifts: Impact of Covid-19 , 2020, International Journal of Information Management.

[10]  Mary Beth Watson-Manheim,et al.  Digital work and organisational transformation: Emergent Digital/Human work configurations in modern organisations , 2020, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems.

[11]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Building a complementary agenda for business process management and digital innovation , 2020, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Andrew K. Przybylski,et al.  Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science , 2020, The Lancet Psychiatry.

[13]  John W. Goodell,et al.  COVID-19 and finance: Agendas for future research , 2020, Finance Research Letters.

[14]  Guido Lorenzoni,et al.  Macroeconomic Implications of Covid-19: Can Negative Supply Shocks Cause Demand Shortages? , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[15]  C. Cherniss,et al.  Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Beyond: Micropractices for Burnout Prevention and Emotional Wellness , 2020, Journal of the American College of Radiology.

[16]  Elena Pellizzoni,et al.  Leveraging stakeholders' knowledge in new service development: a dynamic approach , 2020, J. Knowl. Manag..

[17]  Pär J. Ågerfalk Artificial intelligence as digital agency , 2020, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[18]  P. Selig,et al.  Digital Transformation and Brazilian Agribusiness: An Analysis of Knowledge Management in the Sector , 2020 .

[19]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  Information technology and the search for organizational agility: A systematic review with future research possibilities , 2019, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[20]  John F. Mahon,et al.  Management Innovation in a VUCA World: Challenges and Recommendations , 2018, California Management Review.

[21]  Anthony Palomba,et al.  Virtual perceived emotional intelligence: How high brand loyalty video game players evaluate their own video game play experiences to repair or regulate emotions , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  Mark de Reuver,et al.  The digital platform: a research agenda , 2018, J. Inf. Technol..

[23]  Torsten Eymann,et al.  Digitalization: Opportunity and Challenge for the Business and Information Systems Engineering Community , 2017, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[24]  Mayuram S. Krishnan,et al.  Leveraging Customer Involvement for Fueling Innovation: The Role of Relational and Analytical Information Processing Capabilities , 2017, MIS Q..

[25]  M. Taylor,et al.  Does proactive personality matter in leadership transitions? Effects of proactive personality on new leader identification and responses to new leaders and their change agendas , 2016 .

[26]  Erica R.H. Fuchs,et al.  When Risks Cannot Be Seen: Regulating Uncertainty in Emerging Technologies , 2016 .

[27]  Abby Ghobadian,et al.  e-Leadership through strategic alignment: an empirical study of small- and medium-sized enterprises in the digital age , 2016, J. Inf. Technol..

[28]  Ulrich Remus,et al.  Control Configuration and Control Enactment in Information Systems Projects: Review and Expanded Theoretical Framework , 2016, MIS Q..

[29]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Time and information technology in teams: a review of empirical research and future research directions , 2015, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[30]  M. Haas,et al.  Information, Attention, and Decision Making , 2015 .

[31]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Developing information processing capability for operational agility: implications from a Chinese manufacturer , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Regina F. Bento,et al.  Strategic Performance Management Systems: Impact on Business Results , 2014, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Damien Bo,et al.  Strategic Analysis of Knowledge Firms: The links between Knowledge Management and Leadership , 2013, J. Knowl. Manag..

[34]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Advancing Public Trust Relationships in Electronic Government: The Singapore E-Filing Journey , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[35]  Jinghua Xiao,et al.  Resource Structuring or Capability Building? An Empirical Study of the Business Value of Information Technology , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[36]  John M. Ward,et al.  Information systems strategy: Quo vadis? , 2012, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  “Less is More:” Information Systems Planning in an Uncertain Environment , 2012, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[38]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  A summary and review of Galbraith's organizational information processing theory , 2012 .

[39]  Yolande E. Chan,et al.  A Multilevel Model for Measuring Fit Between a Firm's Competitive Strategies and Information Systems Capabilities , 2011, MIS Q..

[40]  Barney Tan,et al.  Demystifying case research: A structured-pragmatic-situational (SPS) approach to conducting case studies , 2011, Inf. Organ..

[41]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  Understanding Responses to Supply Chain Disruptions: Insights from Information Processing and Resource Dependence Perspectives , 2011 .

[42]  A. Kaklauskas,et al.  KNOWLEDGE MODEL FOR INTEGRATED CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT , 2011 .

[43]  Timothy K Lee,et al.  Single-cell NF-κB dynamics reveal digital activation and analogue information processing , 2010, Nature.

[44]  Jaepil Choi,et al.  Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance , 2009 .

[45]  Monideepa Tarafdar,et al.  Understanding the influence of information systems competencies on process innovation: A resource-based view , 2007, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  The effectiveness of strategic information systems planning under environmental uncertainty , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[47]  Carol Stoak Saunders,et al.  Information Processing View of Organizations: An Exploratory Examination of Fit in the Context of Interorganizational Relationships , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[48]  Michael J. Cerullo,et al.  Business Continuity Planning: A Comprehensive Approach , 2004, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[49]  Hans Georg Gemünden,et al.  Network competence: Its impact on innovation success and its antecedents , 2003 .

[50]  Raj Mehta,et al.  An Investigation into the Antecedents of Organizational Participation in Business-to-Business Electronic Markets , 2001 .

[51]  John Benamati, Albert L. Lederer Rapid Information Technology Change, Coping Mechanisms, and the Emerging Technologies Group , 2001 .

[52]  Kakoli Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Managing technology risks in the healthcare sector: disaster recovery and business continuity planning , 2000 .

[53]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[54]  Niv Ahituv,et al.  Environmental scanning and information systems in relation to success in introducing new products , 1998, Inf. Manag..

[55]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[56]  William H. Glick,et al.  Studying Changes in Organizational Design and Effectiveness: Retrospective Event Histories and Periodic Assessments , 1990 .