Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Promoter Mutations in A Cohort Of Adult Gliomas – Clinicopathological Correlates

Background: Introduction: Gliomas were previously classified histologically, although now the latest WHO classification incorporates several molecular markers to classify these. Detection of TERT promoter mutations is assuming increased importance due to its relevance to prognostication. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of TERT promoter mutations, association of TERT promoter mutations with other molecular alterations and to assess the role of TERT promoter mutations in overall survival and progression-free survival in relation to histological and molecular glioma subtypes. Materials and Methods: This study analyzed a cohort of 107 adult patients with diffuse gliomas, WHO grades II and III and glioblastoma, by immunohistochemistry for IDH and ATRX mutations, FISH for 1p/19q co-deletions and PCR sequencing for TERT promoter mutation. Further, five glioma molecular sub-groups were derived using three molecular alteration and included the sub-groups with: i) IDH mutations only, ii) IDH and TERT mutations only, iii) IDH and 1p/19q co-deletion only, iv) Triple negative, and v) Triple positive. Results: IDH mutations and 1p/19q co-deletions were individually and significantly associated with an improved progression free (P = 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively) and overall survival (P = 0.000 and P = 0.005, respectively) in the present cohort of gliomas. TERT promoter mutations occurred frequently in anaplastic oligodendrogliomas (94%), oligodendrogliomas (87.5%) and glioblastomas (54%). Sub-division into molecular sub-groups showed that the triple-positive tumors carried the best prognosis, followed by IDH only, triple negative and finally the TERT mutation only tumors (P < 0.000). Conclusion: This indicates that sub-classification using these molecular markers separates tumors into prognostically relevant categories.

[1]  F. Ducray,et al.  Molecular classification of adult gliomas: recent advances and future perspectives , 2018, Current opinion in oncology.

[2]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  cIMPACT-NOW update 3: recommended diagnostic criteria for “Diffuse astrocytic glioma, IDH-wildtype, with molecular features of glioblastoma, WHO grade IV” , 2018, Acta Neuropathologica.

[3]  Stefan M. Pfister,et al.  Distribution of EGFR amplification, combined chromosome 7 gain and chromosome 10 loss, and TERT promoter mutation in brain tumors and their potential for the reclassification of IDHwt astrocytoma to glioblastoma , 2018, Acta Neuropathologica.

[4]  M. Kwon,et al.  Clinical implications of TERT promoter mutation on IDH mutation and MGMT promoter methylation in diffuse gliomas. , 2018, Pathology, research and practice.

[5]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Novel, improved grading system(s) for IDH-mutant astrocytic gliomas , 2018, Acta Neuropathologica.

[6]  D. Louis,et al.  cIMPACT-NOW update 1: Not Otherwise Specified (NOS) and Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC) , 2018, Acta Neuropathologica.

[7]  Hideo Nakamura,et al.  Prognostic relevance of genetic alterations in diffuse lower-grade gliomas , 2018, Neuro-oncology.

[8]  K. Fung,et al.  TERT promoter mutation and its interaction with IDH mutations in glioma: Combined TERT promoter and IDH mutations stratifies lower-grade glioma into distinct survival subgroups-A meta-analysis of aggregate data. , 2017, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[9]  W. Dinjens,et al.  Molecular and clinical heterogeneity of adult diffuse low-grade IDH wild-type gliomas: assessment of TERT promoter mutation and chromosome 7 and 10 copy number status allows superior prognostic stratification , 2017, Acta Neuropathologica.

[10]  Zhifeng Shi,et al.  Adult IDH wild-type lower-grade gliomas should be further stratified , 2017, Neuro-oncology.

[11]  T. Komori,et al.  The 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System: The Major Points of Revision , 2017, Neurologia medico-chirurgica.

[12]  H. Colman,et al.  Glioma Subclassifications and Their Clinical Significance , 2017, Neurotherapeutics.

[13]  Jennie W. Taylor,et al.  Adult infiltrating gliomas with WHO 2016 integrated diagnosis: additional prognostic roles of ATRX and TERT , 2017, Acta Neuropathologica.

[14]  R. Elashoff,et al.  Human TERT promoter mutation enables survival advantage from MGMT promoter methylation in IDH1 wild-type primary glioblastoma treated by standard chemoradiotherapy , 2016, Neuro-oncology.

[15]  C. Sarkar,et al.  Prognostic Stratification of GBMs Using Combinatorial Assessment of IDH1 Mutation, MGMT Promoter Methylation, and TERT Mutation Status: Experience from a Tertiary Care Center in India1 , 2016, Translational oncology.

[16]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary , 2016, Acta Neuropathologica.

[17]  K. Thennarasu,et al.  Prognostic significance of histomolecular subgroups of adult anaplastic (WHO Grade III) gliomas: applying the ‘integrated’ diagnosis approach , 2016, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[18]  Alexander R. Pico,et al.  Glioma Groups Based on 1p/19q, IDH, and TERT Promoter Mutations in Tumors. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Gelareh Zadeh,et al.  Glioblastoma: pathology, molecular mechanisms and markers , 2015, Acta Neuropathologica.

[20]  K. Hemminki,et al.  TERT promoter mutations and telomere length in adult malignant gliomas and recurrences , 2015, Oncotarget.

[21]  K. Hoang-Xuan,et al.  TERT promoter mutations in gliomas, genetic associations and clinico-pathological correlations , 2014, British Journal of Cancer.

[22]  Y. Marie,et al.  Combined analysis of TERT, EGFR, and IDH status defines distinct prognostic glioblastoma classes , 2014, Neurology.

[23]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Farewell to oligoastrocytoma: in situ molecular genetics favor classification as either oligodendroglioma or astrocytoma , 2014, Acta Neuropathologica.

[24]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Distribution of TERT promoter mutations in pediatric and adult tumors of the nervous system , 2013, Acta Neuropathologica.

[25]  T. Holland-Letz,et al.  ATRX loss refines the classification of anaplastic gliomas and identifies a subgroup of IDH mutant astrocytic tumors with better prognosis , 2013, Acta Neuropathologica.

[26]  K. Ichimura,et al.  Upregulating mutations in the TERT promoter commonly occur in adult malignant gliomas and are strongly associated with total 1p19q loss , 2013, Acta Neuropathologica.

[27]  Howard Colman,et al.  IDH1 and IDH2 Mutations in Gliomas , 2013, Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports.

[28]  P. Kleihues,et al.  The Definition of Primary and Secondary Glioblastoma , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[29]  J. Silber,et al.  Whole exome sequencing identifies ATRX mutation as a key molecular determinant in lower-grade glioma , 2012, Oncotarget.

[30]  Andrey Korshunov,et al.  Frequent ATRX mutations and loss of expression in adult diffuse astrocytic tumors carrying IDH1/IDH2 and TP53 mutations , 2012, Acta Neuropathologica.

[31]  Christian Mawrin,et al.  Type and frequency of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are related to astrocytic and oligodendroglial differentiation and age: a study of 1,010 diffuse gliomas , 2009, Acta Neuropathologica.

[32]  D. Busam,et al.  An Integrated Genomic Analysis of Human Glioblastoma Multiforme , 2008, Science.

[33]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  Molecular classification of gliomas. , 2016, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[34]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  ATRX and IDH1-R132H immunohistochemistry with subsequent copy number analysis and IDH sequencing as a basis for an “integrated” diagnostic approach for adult astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma and glioblastoma , 2014, Acta Neuropathologica.

[35]  F. Ducray,et al.  IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.