Public Infrastructure and Wages: Public Capital's Role as a Productive Input and Household Amenity

Production function studies typically conclude that public capital plays little role in enhancing productivity. However, others have found that infrastructure and employment growth are positively related. These apparently conflicting results can be reconciled if public capital serves as a household amenity that increases labor supply without dramatically increasing productivity. This study examines the impact of public capital on wages in order to assess whether productivity or amenity effects dominate. For the economy as a whole, the results suggest that highway's strongest role is as a household amenity, however, for the manufacturing sector, the productivity effect of highways appears to dominate.

[1]  M. Partridge,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF TAXES, EXPENDITURES, AND PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE ON METROPOLITAN AREA EMPLOYMENT* , 1995 .

[2]  Robert H. Porter,et al.  The Effect of Public Capital in State-Level Production Functions Reconsidered , 1993 .

[3]  D. Waldman,et al.  Multimarket Amenity Compensation and the Behavior of the Elderly , 1991 .

[4]  E. Gramlich,et al.  Infrastructure Investment: A Review Essay , 1994 .

[5]  K Mera,et al.  II. REGIONAL PRODUCTION FUNCTIONS AND SOCIAL OVERHEAD CAPITAL: AN ANALYSIS OF THE JAPANESE CASE. IN: TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE , 1973 .

[6]  J. Roback.  Wages, Rents, and the Quality of Life , 1982, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  G. Carlino,et al.  Accounting for differences in aggregate state productivity , 1992 .

[8]  John F. McDonald,et al.  The effect of anticipated transportation improvement on residential land values , 1995 .

[9]  H. Herzog.  Who Benefits from State and Local Economic Development Policies , 1992 .

[10]  G. Treyz.  Causes of changes in wage variation among states , 1991 .

[11]  Jonathan Ratner,et al.  Government capital and the production function for U.S. private output , 1983 .

[12]  Identifying Productivity and Amenity Effects in Interurban Wage Differentials , 1989 .

[13]  David Alan Aschauer,et al.  Government spending and the "falling rate of profit." , 1988 .

[14]  B. Hirsch,et al.  Union Membership and Coverage Files from the Current Population Surveys: Note , 1993 .

[15]  George I. Treyz,et al.  The REMI Economic-Demographic Forecasting and Simulation Model , 1991 .

[16]  J. Meade,et al.  External Economies and Diseconomies in a Competitive Situation , 1952 .

[17]  M. Partridge,et al.  Differences in State Unemployment Rates: The Role of Labor and Product Market Structural Shifts , 1995 .

[18]  Donald N. Dewees,et al.  The effect of a subway on residential property values in Toronto , 1976 .

[19]  G. Blomquist,et al.  New Estimates of Quality of Life in Urban Areas , 1988 .

[20]  M. Partridge,et al.  Public Infrastructure: Pork or Jobs Creator? , 1998 .

[21]  W. Fischel.  Fiscal and environmental considerations in the location of firms in suburban communities , 1973 .

[22]  Joseph S. Tracy,et al.  The Importance of Local Fiscal Conditions in Analyzing Local Labor Markets , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[23]  Robert E. Hall,et al.  Industry Rents: Evidence and Implications , 1989 .

[24]  Douglas Holtz-Eakin,et al.  Infrastructure in a Structural Model of Economic Growth , 1994 .