Comparison of Road Traffic Noise prediction models: CNOSSOS-EU, Nord2000 and TRANEX.

Road traffic noise is the most pervasive source of ambient outdoor noise pollution in Europe. Traffic noise prediction models vary in parameterisation and therefore may produce different estimates of noise levels depending on the geographical setting in terms of emissions sources and propagation field. This paper compares three such models: the European standard, Common Noise Assessment Methods for the EU Member States (hereafter, CNOSSOS), Nord2000 and Traffic Noise Exposure (TRANEX) model based on the UK methodology, in terms of their source and propagation characteristics. The tools are also compared by analysing estimated noise (LAeq) from CNOSSOS, Nord2000 (2006 version), and TRANEX for more than one hundred test cases (N = 111) covering a variety of source and receiver configurations (e.g. varying source to receiver distance). The main aim of this approach was to investigate the potential pattern in differences between models' performance for certain types of configurations. Discrepancies in performance may thus be linked to the differences in parameterisations of the CNOSSOS, Nord2000, and TRANEX (e.g. handling of diffraction, refraction). In most cases, both CNOSSOS and TRANEX reproduced LAeq levels of Nord2000 (2006 version) within three to five dBA (CNOSSOS: 87%, TRANEX: 94%). The differences in LAeq levels of CNOSSOS, compared to Nord2000, can be related to several shortcomings of the existing CNOSSOS algorithms (e.g. ground attenuation, multiple diffractions, and mean ground plane). The analyses show that more research is required in order to improve CNOSSOS for its implementation in the EU. In this context, amendments for CNOSSOS proposed by an EU Working Group hold significant potential. Overall, both CNOSSOS and TRANEX produced similar results, with TRANEX reproducing Nord2000 LAeq values slightly better than the CNOSSOS. The lack of measured noise data highlights one of the significant limitations of this study and needs to be addressed in future work.

[1]  Susan Hodgson,et al.  Ambient air pollution, traffic noise and adult asthma prevalence: a BioSHaRE approach , 2016, European Respiratory Journal.

[2]  D. Hothersall,et al.  Approximate models for sound propagation above multi‐impedance plane boundaries , 1995 .

[3]  Simon de Lisle.  Comparison of Road Traffic Noise Prediction Models: CoRTN, TNM, NMPB, ASJ RTN , 2016 .

[4]  Fabienne Anfosso-Lédée,et al.  Advances in the development of common noise assessment methods in Europe: The CNOSSOS-EU framework for strategic environmental noise mapping. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  Reto Pieren,et al.  Conversion between noise exposure indicators Leq24h, LDay, LEvening, LNight, Ldn and Lden: Principles and practical guidance. , 2018, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[6]  Paul Wilkinson,et al.  Long-term traffic air and noise pollution in relation to mortality and hospital readmission among myocardial infarction survivors. , 2016, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[7]  C. F. Chien,et al.  A note on the calculation of sound propagation along an impedance surface , 1980 .

[8]  W. J. Hadden,et al.  Sound diffraction around screens and wedges for arbitrary point source locations , 1981 .

[9]  Naveen Garg,et al.  A critical review of principal traffic noise models: Strategies and implications , 2014 .

[10]  Matthias Ketzel,et al.  Combined effects of road traffic noise and ambient air pollution in relation to risk for stroke? , 2014, Environmental research.

[11]  Pichai Pamanikabud,et al.  Geographical information system for traffic noise analysis and forecasting with the appearance of barriers , 2003, Environ. Model. Softw..

[12]  M. Casas,et al.  WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Cardiovascular and Metabolic Effects: A Summary , 2018, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[13]  Campbell Steele,et al.  A critical review of some traffic noise prediction models , 2001 .

[14]  Volker Wittstock,et al.  Does it matter whether single-number values of sound reduction indices are evaluated from third-octave band values or from octave band values? , 2012 .

[15]  H. Bendtsen.  The Nordic prediction method for road traffic noise , 1999 .

[16]  Sandra Wegener,et al.  Is a liveable city a healthy city? Health impacts of urban and transport planning in Vienna, Austria. , 2020, Environmental research.

[17]  H. G. Jonasson,et al.  Sound reduction by barriers on the ground , 1972 .

[18]  A. Tjønneland,et al.  Road Traffic Noise and Incident Myocardial Infarction: A Prospective Cohort Study , 2012, PloS one.

[19]  David Morley,et al.  Development of an open-source road traffic noise model for exposure assessment , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..