Genericity and Aspect in L2 Acquisition

In this experimental study, we focus on the following semantic universal: if a habitual clause reading, then generic pronominal subject; if an episodic clause reading, then specific pronominal subject. We argue that although this set of two conditionals is a universal property of all natural languages, English-speaking second-language (L2) learners of Spanish must access it through the mediation of aspectual morphology. Because habitual and episodic readings are encoded by different functional morphemes in English and Spanish, the L2 acquisition of this semantic universal necessitates a significant restructuring of the native form-to-meaning mappings. Even more problematic from a learnability point of view is the negative constraint on generic pronominal subjects in sentences with the Preterite. We compare the acquisition of the universal computational mechanism and the negative constraint with acquisition of the prototypical habitual and episodic meanings of the Spanish Imperfect and Preterite with dynamic predicates. Our findings indicate that advanced and even intermediate English-speaking learners of Spanish are significantly more accurate on the generic and specific subject interpretation purportedly regulated by a semantic universal and on the negative constraint requiring specialized syntactic computation than the prototypical habitual and episodic meanings usually taught in language classrooms. We argue that L2 learners have access to semantic universals and how these interact with movement at the syntax-semantics interface even before full acquisition of target form-to-meaning mappings. Our conclusion is that L2 acquisition of aspectual syntax and semantics is regulated by domain-specific constraints.

[1]  Laurent Dekydtspotter,et al.  The interpretive interface in L2 acquisition: the process-result distinction in English-French inter , 1997 .

[2]  Robert Bley-Vroman,et al.  The logical problem of foreign language learning , 1989 .

[3]  E. Williams Thematic structure in syntax , 1994 .

[4]  Cecilia Yuet Hung Chan,et al.  The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: the ‘failed functional features hypothesis’ , 1997 .

[5]  Joyce Bruhn de Garavito,et al.  L2 acquisition of verb complementation and Binding Principle B. , 1995 .

[6]  Donna Lardiere,et al.  Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar , 1998 .

[7]  S. Crain Investigations In Universal Grammar , 1998 .

[8]  Rex A. Sprouse,et al.  Mental design and (second) language epistemology: adjectival restrictions of wh-quantifiers and tense in English-French interlanguage , 2001 .

[9]  Cristina Job Schmitt,et al.  Aspect and the syntax of noun phrases , 1996 .

[10]  A. Kenny Action, Emotion And Will , 1965 .

[11]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Knowledge and Obedience: The Developmental Status of the Binding Theory , 1990 .

[12]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[13]  Lydia White,et al.  Effects of Instruction on Second Language Acquisition of the Japanese Long-Distance Reflexive Zibun , 1996, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[14]  Roumyana Slabakova Semantic evidence for functional categories in interlanguage grammars , 2003 .

[15]  Judith E. Liskin-Gasparro The Use of Tense-Aspect Morphology in Spanish Oral Narratives: Exploring the Perceptions of Advanced Learners. , 2000 .

[16]  Rex A. Sprouse,et al.  The Interpretation of Quantification at a Distance in English-French Interlanguage: Domain Specificity and Second-Language Acquisition , 2000 .

[17]  B. D. Schwartz LET'S MAKE UP YOUR MIND , 1999, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[18]  M. Rafael Salaberry,et al.  Procedural Vocabulary: Lexical Signalling of Conceptual Relations in the Development of Past Tense Verbal Morphology in Classroom L2 Spanish. , 1999 .

[19]  M. Garman,et al.  Tense and aspect , 1986 .

[20]  Barbara H. Partee,et al.  Quantificational Structures and Compositionality , 1995 .

[21]  Gennaro Chierchia,et al.  The Variability of Impersonal Subjects , 1995 .

[22]  John Bowers The syntax of predication , 1993 .

[23]  Laurent Dekydtspotter The Universal Parser and interlanguage: domain-specific mental organization in the comprehension of combien interrogatives in English-French interlanguage , 2001 .

[24]  Henriëtte de Swart,et al.  Aspect shift and coercion , 1998 .

[25]  Jacquelyn Schachter,et al.  Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition: Testing a proposed universal , 1989 .

[26]  Fabio Pianesi,et al.  Tense and Aspect: From Semantics to Morphosyntax , 1997 .

[27]  M. A. Jones Tense, aspect and mood , 1996 .

[28]  Lydia White,et al.  The Researcher Gave the Subject a Test about Himself: Problems of Ambiguity and Preference in the Investigation of Reflexive Binding , 1997 .

[29]  Massimo Marraffa The Mind Doesn't Work That Way. The Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology , 2001 .

[30]  Henk J. Verkuyl,et al.  A theory of aspectuality , 1993 .

[31]  Francis Jeffry Pelletier,et al.  The Generic book , 1997 .

[32]  Henk J. Verkuyl,et al.  On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects , 1972 .

[33]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology , 1984 .

[34]  M. Rita Manzini,et al.  Parameters and Learnability in Binding Theory , 1987 .

[35]  Lydia White,et al.  Missing Surface Inflection or Impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement , 2000 .

[36]  Kazue Kanno,et al.  The Status of a Nonparametrized Principle in the L2 Initial State , 1996 .

[37]  Angelika Kratzer,et al.  Stage-Level and Individual-Level Predicates , 1995 .

[38]  K. Kanno The stability of UG principles in second-language acquisition: evidence from Japanese , 1998 .

[39]  Donna Lardiere Case and Tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state , 1998 .

[40]  W. O'grady TOWARD A NEW NATIVISM , 1999, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[41]  On evaluating arguments for special nativism in second language acquisition theory , 1996 .

[42]  William O'Grady,et al.  Language acquisition without Universal Grammar: a general nativist proposal for L2 learning , 1996 .

[43]  Greg Carlson,et al.  A unified analysis of the English bare plural , 1977 .

[44]  Ianthi Maria Tsimpli,et al.  The mind of a savant: Language learning and modularity. , 1997 .

[45]  Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig,et al.  FROM MORPHEME STUDIES TO TEMPORAL SEMANTICS , 1999, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[46]  Gregory Norman Carlson,et al.  Reference to kinds in English , 1977 .

[47]  J. Zwart The Minimalist Program , 1998, Journal of Linguistics.

[48]  Carlota S. Smith,et al.  The Parameter of Aspect , 1991 .

[49]  Zeno Vendler,et al.  Verbs and Times , 1957, The Language of Time - A Reader.