Numerical simulation of UV disinfection reactors: Evaluation of alternative turbulence models

Six turbulence models, including standard k–e, k–e RNG, k–ω (88), revised k–ω (98), Reynolds stress transport model (RSTM), and two-fluid model (TFM), were applied to the simulation of a closed conduit polychromatic UV reactor. Predicted flow field and turbulent kinetic energy were compared with the experimental data from a digital particle image velocimetry (DPIV). All of the predicted flow fields were combined with a multiple segment source summation (MSSS) fluence rate model and three different microbial response kinetic models to simulate the disinfection process at two UV lamp power conditions. Microbial transport was simulated using the Lagrangian particle tracking method. The results show that the fluence distributions and the effluent inactivation levels were sensitive to the turbulence model selection. The level of sensitivity was a function of the operating conditions and the UV response kinetics of the microorganisms. Simulations with operating conditions that produced higher log inactivation or utilized microorganisms with higher UV sensitivity showed greater sensitivity to the turbulence model selection. In addition, a broader fluence distribution was found with turbulence models that predicted a larger wake region behind the lamps.

[1]  Joel J. Ducoste,et al.  Alternative Approaches to Modeling Fluence Distribution and Microbial Inactivation in Ultraviolet Reactors: Lagrangian versus Eulerian , 2005 .

[2]  Charles G. Speziale,et al.  An analysis of RNG‐based turbulence models for homogeneous shear flow , 1991 .

[3]  R. Clift,et al.  Bubbles, Drops, and Particles , 1978 .

[4]  P. Gaskell,et al.  Curvature‐compensated convective transport: SMART, A new boundedness‐ preserving transport algorithm , 1988 .

[5]  F. Menter Improved two-equation k-omega turbulence models for aerodynamic flows , 1992 .

[6]  Joel J. Ducoste,et al.  Evaluation of alternative fluence rate distribution models , 2004 .

[7]  D. A. Lyn,et al.  Steady and Unsteady Simulations of Turbulent Flow and Transport in Ultraviolet Disinfection Channels , 2004 .

[8]  B. Launder,et al.  The numerical computation of turbulent flows , 1990 .

[9]  Ridha Abid,et al.  A critical evaluation of two-equation models for near wall turbulence , 1990 .

[10]  Norberto Fueyo,et al.  Two-fluid models of turbulence for axi-symmetrical jets and sprays , 1990 .

[11]  S. Orszag,et al.  Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory , 1986 .

[12]  Francis H. Harlow,et al.  Transport Equations in Turbulence , 1970 .

[13]  D. B. Spalding,et al.  A two-fluid model of turbulence and its application to near-wall flows , 1987 .

[14]  Carlos F.M. Coimbra,et al.  Fundamental aspects of modeling turbulent particle dispersion in dilute flows , 1996 .

[15]  A. Cabaj,et al.  Measurement of Ultraviolet Radiation with Biological Dosimeters , 2000 .

[16]  Dennis A. Lyn,et al.  Numerical Modeling of Flow and Disinfection in UV Disinfection Channels , 1999 .

[17]  J. Bolton Calculation of ultraviolet fluence rate distributions in an annular reactor: significance of refraction and reflection , 2000 .

[18]  Derek M. Causon,et al.  A cartesian cut cell method for compressible flows Part A: static body problems , 1997, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[19]  P. Liu,et al.  Advances in Coastal and Ocean Engineering , 1999 .

[20]  S. Orszag,et al.  Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory , 1986, Physical review letters.

[21]  G. Faeth Evaporation and combustion of sprays , 1983 .

[22]  D. Giles,et al.  Finite element analysis of particle and liquid flow through an ultraviolet reactor , 1998 .

[23]  David C. Wilcox,et al.  Comparison of two-equation turbulence models for boundary layers with pressure gradient , 1993 .