Community membership consistency in corporate board interlock networks

Community detection is a well established method for studying the meso scale structure of social networks. Applying a community detection algorithm results in a division of a network into communities that is often used to inspect and reason about community membership of specific nodes. This micro level interpretation step of community structure is a crucial step in typical social science research. However, the methodological caveat in this step is that virtually all modern community detection methods are non-deterministic and based on randomization and approximated results. This needs to be explicitly taken into consideration when reasoning about community membership of individual nodes. To do so, we propose a metric of \emph{community membership consistency}, that provides node-level insights in how reliable the placement of that node into a community really is. In addition, it enables us to distinguish the \emph{community core} members of a community. The usefulness the proposed metrics is demonstrated on corporate board interlock networks, in which weighted links represent shared senior level directors between firms. Results suggest that the community structure of global business groups is centered around persistent communities consisting of core countries tied by geographical and cultural proximity. In addition, we identify fringe countries that appear to associate with a number of different global business communities.

[1]  Mario Mureddu,et al.  Community core detection in transportation networks , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[2]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Finding Statistically Significant Communities in Networks , 2010, PloS one.

[3]  O. Sporns.  Structure and function of complex brain networks , 2013, Dialogues in clinical neuroscience.

[4]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Resolution limit in community detection , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Frank W. Takes,et al.  Where is the global corporate elite? A large-scale network study of local and nonlocal interlocking directorates , 2016, ArXiv.

[6]  Anthony Elliott,et al.  The Making of a Transnational Capitalist Class: Corporate Power in the 21st Century , 2012 .

[7]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[8]  Vincent A. Traag,et al.  From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[9]  Martin Rosvall,et al.  Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Petter Holme,et al.  Community consistency determines the stability transition window of power-grid nodes , 2015, 1504.05717.

[11]  W. Carroll,et al.  The Making of a Transnational Capitalist Class: Corporate Power in the 21st Century , 2010 .

[12]  Frank W. Takes,et al.  The Effects of Data Quality on the Analysis of Corporate Board Interlock Networks , 2016, Inf. Syst..

[13]  M E J Newman,et al.  Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  Downloaded from , 1997 .

[15]  Frank W. Takes,et al.  The duality of firms and directors in board interlock networks: A relational event modeling approach , 2020, Soc. Networks.

[16]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Consensus clustering in complex networks , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[17]  Martin Rosvall,et al.  Exploring the solution landscape enables more reliable network community detection , 2019, Physical review. E.

[18]  Patrick J. Akard.  :Corporate Power in a Globalizing World: A Study in Elite Social Organization , 2006 .

[19]  Frank W. Takes,et al.  Centrality in the global network of corporate control , 2016, Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[20]  G. Davis.  Agents without Principles? The Spread of the Poison Pill through the Intercorporate Network , 1991 .

[21]  Frank W. Takes,et al.  The Corporate Elite Community Structure of Global Capitalism , 2016 .

[22]  Jamie Twycross,et al.  From clusters to queries: exploiting uncertainty in the modularity landscape of complex networks , 2018, ArXiv.

[23]  M. Ormos,et al.  Friendship of Stock Market Indices: A Cluster-Based Investigation of Stock Markets , 2018, Journal of Risk and Financial Management.

[24]  Julián Cárdenas.  Are Latin America's corporate elites transnationally interconnected? A network analysis of interlocking directorates , 2015 .

[25]  Sang Hoon Lee,et al.  Relational flexibility of network elements based on inconsistent community detection , 2019, Physical review. E.

[26]  Tiago P. Peixoto.  Revealing consensus and dissensus between network partitions , 2020, Physical Review X.

[27]  Sanjukta Bhowmick,et al.  Constant Communities in Complex Networks , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[28]  Benjamin H. Good,et al.  Performance of modularity maximization in practical contexts. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[29]  M. E. J. Newman,et al.  Consistency of community structure in complex networks , 2019, Physical review. E.

[30]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Stable Community Cores in Complex Networks , 2012, CompleNet.

[31]  Bruce Kogut,et al.  The Small Worlds of Corporate Governance , 2012 .

[32]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Community detection in graphs , 2009, ArXiv.