Quantitative analysis of multi‐protein interactions using FRET: Application to the SUMO pathway

Protein–protein binding and signaling pathways are important fields of biomedical science. Here we report simple optical methods for the determination of the equilibrium binding constant Kd of protein–protein interactions as well as quantitative studies of biochemical cascades. The techniques are based on steady‐state and time‐resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between ECFP and Venus‐YFP fused to proteins of the SUMO family. Using FRET has several advantages over conventional free‐solution techniques such as isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC): Concentrations are determined accurately by absorbance, highly sensitive binding signals enable the analysis of small quantities, and assays are compatible with multi‐well plate format. Most importantly, our FRET‐based techniques enable us to measure the effect of other molecules on the binding of two proteins of interest, which is not straightforward with other approaches. These assays provide powerful tools for the study of competitive biochemical cascades and the extent to which drug candidates modify protein interactions.

[1]  Atsushi Miyawaki,et al.  Lighting up cells: labelling proteins with fluorophores. , 2003, Nature cell biology.

[2]  Y. Mo,et al.  Targeting Ubc9 for cancer therapy , 2005, Expert opinion on therapeutic targets.

[3]  David Reverter,et al.  Insights into E3 ligase activity revealed by a SUMO–RanGAP1–Ubc9–Nup358 complex , 2005, Nature.

[4]  Takeharu Nagai,et al.  Shift anticipated in DNA microarray market , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  David C Schwartz,et al.  A superfamily of protein tags: ubiquitin, SUMO and related modifiers. , 2003, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[6]  M. Tatham,et al.  Role of two residues proximal to the active site of Ubc9 in substrate recognition by the Ubc9.SUMO-1 thiolester complex. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[7]  David J. S. Birch,et al.  REVIEW ARTICLE: Single-photon timing detectors for fluorescence lifetime spectroscopy , 1996 .

[8]  M. Tatham,et al.  A fluorescence-resonance-energy-transfer-based protease activity assay and its use to monitor paralog-specific small ubiquitin-like modifier processing. , 2007, Analytical biochemistry.

[9]  M. Chalfie,et al.  Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression. , 1994, Science.

[10]  F. Melchior,et al.  SUMO: ligases, isopeptidases and nuclear pores. , 2003, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[11]  M. Tatham,et al.  Unique binding interactions among Ubc9, SUMO and RanBP2 reveal a mechanism for SUMO paralog selection , 2005, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[12]  M. Hochstrasser,et al.  Evolution and function of ubiquitin-like protein-conjugation systems , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[13]  R. Hay,et al.  SUMO: a history of modification. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[14]  Takeharu Nagai,et al.  Cyan-emitting and orange-emitting fluorescent proteins as a donor/acceptor pair for fluorescence resonance energy transfer. , 2004, The Biochemical journal.

[15]  M. Tatham,et al.  Role of an N-terminal site of Ubc9 in SUMO-1, -2, and -3 binding and conjugation. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[16]  Gabriel Waksman Proteomics and protein-protein interactions : biology, chemistry, bionformatics, and drug design , 2005 .

[17]  A. Christopoulos,et al.  Fitting Models to Biological Data Using Linear and Nonlinear Regression: A Practical Guide to Curve Fitting , 2004 .

[18]  David J. Chen,et al.  The Binding Interface between an E2 (UBC9) and a Ubiquitin Homologue (UBL1)* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  W. Melchers,et al.  Homomultimerization of the Coxsackievirus 2B Protein in Living Cells Visualized by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Microscopy , 2002, Journal of Virology.

[20]  E. Yeh,et al.  Ubiquitin-like proteins: new wines in new bottles. , 2000, Gene.

[21]  V. Wilson Sumoylation : molecular biology and biochemistry , 2004 .

[22]  Gabriel Waksman,et al.  Proteomics and Protein-Protein Interactions , 2005 .