Redesigning Educational Peer Review Interactions Using Computer Tools: An Introduction.

Peer review is a family of instructional techniques. Historically, these have been employed in writing and many other educational domains. Modern computer technologies facilitate the use of peer review, which is especially relevant to educational settings where it is not practical to administer peer review manually. The use of computer support for peer review has shed light on many important scientific questions, some of which we summarize. These findings set the context for the papers in this special issue, which demonstrate how computer support for peer review enables research on peer review itself and on its pedagogical significance. © Earli.

[1]  John Hamer,et al.  A Method of Automatic Grade Calibration in Peer Assessment , 2005, ACE.

[2]  Peter Elbow,et al.  Everyone Can Write: Essays toward a Hopeful Theory of Writing and Teaching Writing , 2000 .

[3]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities , 1994 .

[4]  Peter Brusilovsky,et al.  Modeling peer review in example annotation , 2008 .

[5]  Patrick Onghena,et al.  An inventory of peer assessment diversity , 2011 .

[6]  Ke Wang,et al.  Summarizing Review Scores of "Unequal" Reviewers , 2007, SDM.

[7]  George Hillocks,et al.  Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching. , 1986 .

[8]  Fiona Spence,et al.  Peer assessment using aropä , 2007 .

[9]  Peter Brusilovsky,et al.  ELM-ART: An Adaptive Versatile System for Web-based Instruction , 2001 .

[10]  Anna Leontjeva,et al.  Linguistic and review features of peer feedback and their effect on the implementation of changes in academic writing: A corpus based investigation , 2012 .

[11]  Ali Shakouri,et al.  ExplaNet: A Collaborative Learning Tool and Hybrid Recommender System for Student-Authored Explanations , 2008 .

[12]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  Assessing Reviewer's Performance Based on Mining Problem Localization in Peer-Review Data , 2010, EDM.

[13]  Andreas Zeller,et al.  Making students read and review code , 2000, ITiCSE '00.

[14]  Linda Bol,et al.  A Comparison of Anonymous versus Identifiable e-Peer Review on College Student Writing Performance and the Extent of Critical Feedback. , 2007 .

[15]  Kevin D. Ashley,et al.  Eliciting formative assessment in peer review , 2012 .

[16]  Maria Grigoriadou,et al.  Supporting Self- Peer- and Collaborative-Assessment through a Web-based Environment , 2006 .

[17]  P. Miller,et al.  The Effect of Scoring Criteria Specificity on Peer and Self-assessment , 2003 .