Understanding project success through analysis of project management approach

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to show that project success is dependent on the project management approach selected, relative to the challenges posed by the project, and to develop an analytical model for analyzing the performance of the project organization. Design/methodology/approach – The research is based on literature review, model development, interviews, and case studies. Findings – The findings define two different approaches in project management: The prescriptive approach focusses on the formal qualities of the project organization, including governing documentation and procedures. The adaptive approach focusses on the process of developing and improving a project organization, project culture and team commitment. The two approaches have been identified through studies of three different case projects. An analytical model, referred to as the Pentagon model, has been applied for analyzing the performance of the project organization and explaining the project management approach. The mod...

[1]  Terry Williams,et al.  A classified bibliography of recent research relating to project risk management , 1995 .

[2]  H. Yazici.  The Role of Project Management Maturity and Organizational Culture in Perceived Performance , 2009 .

[3]  Stephen Emmitt,et al.  Lean and integrated project delivery , 2011 .

[4]  Tzvi Raz,et al.  Use and benefits of tools for project risk management , 2001 .

[5]  Kam Jugdev,et al.  2002 Student Paper Award Winner: Project Management Maturity Models: The Silver Bullets of Competitive Advantage? , 2002 .

[6]  J. Söderlund.  Pluralism in Project Management: Navigating the Crossroads of Specialization and Fragmentation , 2011 .

[7]  Dale Christenson,et al.  Using vision as a critical success element in project management , 2008 .

[8]  Y. Kwak,et al.  Assessing Project Management Maturity , 2000 .

[9]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  Refining the search for project success factors: a multivariate, typological approach , 2002 .

[10]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  Reinventing project management, by Aaron Shenhar a Dov Dvir , 2008 .

[11]  Jeffrey K. Pinto,et al.  Critical factors in successful project implementation , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[12]  Kam Jugdev,et al.  Critical success factors in projects , 2012 .

[13]  William A. Lichtig,et al.  The Integrated Agreement for Lean Project Delivery , 2010 .

[14]  Terry Cooke-Davies,et al.  The “real” success factors on projects , 2002 .

[15]  Iris D. Tommelein,et al.  Lean construction tools and techniques , 2007 .

[16]  Christophe Bredillet,et al.  Exploring Research in Project Management: Nine Schools of Project Management Research (Part 4) , 2008 .

[17]  Andrew Davies,et al.  Innovation in Megaprojects: Systems Integration at London Heathrow Terminal 5 , 2009 .

[18]  H. Johnson,et al.  Profit Beyond Measure: Extraordinary Results Through Attention to Work and People , 2000 .

[19]  Joyce Fortune,et al.  Framing of project critical success factors by a systems model , 2006 .

[20]  Anton de Wit,et al.  Measurement of project success , 1988 .

[21]  Christophe Bredillet,et al.  Exploring Research in Project Management: Nine Schools of Project Management Research (Part 3) , 2007 .

[22]  A. Shenhar,et al.  Project Success: A Multidimensional Strategic Concept , 2001 .

[23]  Walid Belassi,et al.  A new framework for determining critical success/failure factors in projects , 1996 .

[24]  R. Müller,et al.  The Influence of Project Managers on Project Success Criteria and Project Success by Type of Project , 2007 .

[25]  J. Rockart.  Chief executives define their own data needs. , 1979, Harvard business review.

[26]  Peerasit Patanakul,et al.  What Project Strategy Really Is: The Fundamental Building Block in Strategic Project Management , 2012 .