Wireless clinical alerts for critical medication, laboratory and physiologic data

Clinical information systems (CIS) are increasingly employed to manage the information associated with hospital and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients. CIS are typically interfaced to a variety of other systems which provide bedside physiologic data, laboratory results and medication information for video displays and reports. However, having all this information together in electronic format provides an opportunity to detect critically adverse patient conditions, which may be complex. The authors have devised a software system which extracts all pertinent information from the CIS on a continuous basis and sends the data through a series of event detection algorithms. These algorithms are configured to detect critically abnormal physiologic and laboratory values, critical trends and critical indicators of drug reactions and side effects. Once an alert is detected, the software system codes it into a readable alphanumeric alert message and automatically sends it to a commercial paging system. Alerts are received on pagers carried by designated physicians and pharmacists who can take immediate actions to reverse the alert condition.

[1]  D. Bates,et al.  Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. , 1998, JAMA.

[2]  R M Gardner,et al.  Development of a computerized laboratory alerting system. , 1989, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[3]  Karen E. Bradshaw,et al.  Computerized Alerting System Warns of Life-Threatening Events. , 1986 .

[4]  M M Shabot,et al.  The PDMS as a focal point for distributed patient data , 1988, International journal of clinical monitoring and computing.

[5]  M M Shabot,et al.  Decision support alerts for clinical laboratory and blood gas data , 1990, International journal of clinical monitoring and computing.

[6]  M M Shabot,et al.  Real-time wireless decision support alerts on a Palmtop PDA. , 1995, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[7]  Joseph Varon,et al.  Incidence Of Major Drug Interactions And Associated Adverse Drug Events In A Surgical Intensive Care Unit , 2002 .

[8]  M. Michael Shabot,et al.  Inferencing Strategies for Automated Alerts on Critically Abnormal Laboratory and Blood Gas Data , 1994 .

[9]  Jonathan M. Teich,et al.  Research Paper: Identifying Adverse Drug Events: Development of a Computer-based Monitor and Comparison with Chart Review and Stimulated Voluntary Report , 1998, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[10]  M. Michael Shabot,et al.  PREDICTION OF ADVERSE ICU EVENTS BY AUTOMATED MEASUREMENT OF SEVERITY OF ILLNESS AND INTENSITY OF INTERVENTIONS , 1993 .

[11]  M M Shabot,et al.  Automatic extraction of intensity-intervention scores from a computerized surgical intensive care unit flowsheet. , 1987, American journal of surgery.

[12]  C. Safran,et al.  Effect of computer-based alerts on the treatment and outcomes of hospitalized patients. , 1994, Archives of internal medicine.

[13]  R S Evans,et al.  Computerized surveillance of adverse drug events in hospital patients* , 1991, Quality and Safety in Health Care.