An Analytical Approach to Assess the Predictive Value of Biomarkers in Phase II Decision Making

Early Phase II clinical trials typically have a biomarker as a primary outcome. The extent to which a positive result for such a Phase II trial is predictive for Phase III success is of obvious concern. In this article we extend existing approaches for assessing the probability of success in Phase III. We address the case that a dichotomous clinical endpoint of interest is to be measured in Phase III. A Beta prior distribution is suggested that quantifies information from both the data observed on the biomarker and its predictive accuracy. Based on the quantification of the impact of the predictive ability of biomarkers, it is shown that the predictive quality of a biomarker needs to be substantial to support the full development decision. The approach is illustrated with a practical example. A simulation study is presented to illustrate the findings more generally.

[1]  A. Edwards,et al.  Assessment of brain tissue injury after moderate hypothermia in neonates with hypoxic–ischaemic encephalopathy: a nested substudy of a randomised controlled trial , 2010, Lancet Neurology.

[2]  H Merabet,et al.  The design and analysis of sequential clinical trials , 2013 .

[3]  Assessing the success probability of a Phase III clinical trial based on Phase II data. , 2010, Contemporary clinical trials.

[4]  M. Kendall Theoretical Statistics , 1956, Nature.

[5]  E N Atkinson,et al.  Projection from previous studies: a Bayesian and frequentist compromise. , 1987, Controlled clinical trials.

[6]  Nigel Stallard,et al.  Decision‐making in a phase II clinical trial: a new approach combining Bayesian and frequentist concepts , 2005 .

[7]  C. Mehta,et al.  The future of drug development: advancing clinical trial design , 2009, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[8]  L. D. de Vries,et al.  Effect of Hypothermia on Amplitude-Integrated Electroencephalogram in Infants With Asphyxia , 2010, Pediatrics.

[9]  W Maurer,et al.  Creative and Innovative Statistics in Clinical Research and Development , 2005, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[10]  D. Berry Bayesian clinical trials , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[11]  C. Weir,et al.  Statistical evaluation of biomarkers as surrogate endpoints: a literature review , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  D. Rubin,et al.  Principal Stratification in Causal Inference , 2002, Biometrics.

[13]  Fang Liu,et al.  An Extension of Bayesian Expected Power and Its Application in Decision Making , 2010, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.