PORTER: a Prototype System for Patient-Oriented Radiology Reporting

To empower patients to participate in their medical care and decision-making, effective communication is critical. In radiology, the clinical report is the primary medium of communication. Although radiologists historically have authored reports with the referring provider as the intended reader, patients increasingly access the reports through portals to electronic health record systems. We developed a system named PORTER (Patient-Oriented Radiology Reporter) to augment radiology reports with lay-language definitions. Our IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant study protocol analyzed 100 knee MRI reports from an academic medical center to identify the most commonly utilized terms. A glossary of 313 terms was constructed to include definitions of the terms and, where available, links to reference sources and public-domain images. Flesch-Kincaid readability scores were computed to assure that definitions were readable at or below 10th-grade reading level. The system provided an interactive web site to view outpatient knee MRI exams. After logging in with their exam ID number and date of birth, patients viewed their report annotated with definitions from the glossary. Applicable images were displayed when the user’s mouse hovered over a glossary term. This patient-oriented system can help empower patients to better understand their radiology results.

[1]  T. Cogbill,et al.  Computed tomography, magnetic resonance, and ultrasound imaging: basic principles, glossary of terms, and patient safety. , 2011, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[2]  Michael Hogarth,et al.  Text Simplification Using Consumer Health Vocabulary to Generate Patient-Centered Radiology Reporting: Translation and Evaluation , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[3]  F. Murtagh,et al.  Lumbar Disc Nomenclature: Version 2.0 Recommendations of the Combined Task Forces of the North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology, and the American Society of Neuroradiology , 2014, Spine.

[4]  A. J. Johnson,et al.  Access to radiologic reports via a patient portal: clinical simulations to investigate patient preferences. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[5]  Tim B Hunter,et al.  Glossary of medical devices and procedures: abbreviations, acronyms, and definitions. , 2003, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[6]  N. Müller,et al.  Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. , 2008, Radiology.

[7]  Nitin Agarwal,et al.  Health literacy and online educational resources: an opportunity to educate patients. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Joann G. Elmore,et al.  The road toward fully transparent medical records. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  A. John,et al.  A critical review of the readability of online patient education resources from RadiologyInfo.Org. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Daniel L. Rubin,et al.  Creating and Curating a Terminology for Radiology: Ontology Modeling and Analysis , 2008, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[11]  David M. Rind,et al.  Research Paper: Who Uses the Patient Internet Portal? The PatientSite Experience , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[12]  H. Lowe,et al.  Understanding and using the medical subject headings (MeSH) vocabulary to perform literature searches. , 1994, JAMA.

[13]  Alla Keselman,et al.  Towards Consumer-Friendly PHRs: Patients' Experience with Reviewing Their Health Records , 2007, AMIA.

[14]  Giles W Boland,et al.  JOURNAL CLUB: Structured Feedback From Patients on Actual Radiology Reports: A Novel Approach to Improve Reporting Practices. , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  C. McDonald,et al.  LOINC, a universal standard for identifying laboratory observations: a 5-year update. , 2003, Clinical chemistry.

[16]  Alla Keselman,et al.  Making Texts in Electronic Health Records Comprehensible to Consumers: A Prototype Translator , 2007, AMIA.

[17]  Lauren Wilcox,et al.  Supporting Families in Reviewing and Communicating about Radiology Imaging Studies , 2017, CHI.

[18]  Ricky K. Taira,et al.  Research and applications: Imaging informatics for consumer health: towards a radiology patient portal , 2013, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[19]  E. Burnside,et al.  The ACR BI-RADS experience: learning from history. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[20]  R. Saunders,et al.  Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America , 2013 .

[21]  R. P. Fishburne,et al.  Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel , 1975 .

[22]  Michael A. Bruno,et al.  The "open letter": radiologists' reports in the era of patient web portals. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[23]  Roy T. Fielding,et al.  Principled design of the modern Web architecture , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Software Engineering. ICSE 2000 the New Millennium.

[24]  Curtis P Langlotz,et al.  ACR BI-RADS for breast imaging communication: a roadmap for the rest of radiology. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.