A method for communication analysis in prosthodontics.

Particularly in prosthodontics, in which the issues of esthetic preferences and possibilities are abundant, improved knowledge about dentist patient communication during clinical encounters is important. Because previous studies on communication used different methods and patient materials, the results are difficult to evaluate. There is, therefore, a need for methodologic development. One method that makes it possible to quantitatively describe different interaction behaviors during clinical encounters is the Roter Method of Interaction Process Analysis (RIAS). Since the method was developed in the USA for use in the medical context, a translation of the method into Swedish and a modification of the categories for use in prosthodontics were necessary. The revised manual was used to code 10 audio recordings of dentist patient encounters at a specialist clinic for prosthodontics. No major alterations of the RIAS manual were made during the translation and modification. The study shows that it is possible to distinguish patterns of communication in audio-recorded dentist patient encounters. The method also made the identification of different interaction profiles possible. These profiles distinguished well among the audio-recorded encounters. The coding procedures were tested for intra-rater reliability and found to be 97% for utterance classification and lambda = 0.76 for categorization definition. It was concluded that the revised RIAS method is applicable in communication studies in prosthodontics.

[1]  A. Sheiham,et al.  The development of a socio-dental measure of dental impacts on daily living. , 1996, Community dental health.

[2]  Nancy R. Katz,et al.  Relations Between Physicians' Behaviors and Analogue Patients' Satisfaction, Recall, and Impressions , 1987, Medical care.

[3]  W. Kukull,et al.  Outcome-Based Doctor-Patient Interaction Analysis: I. Comparison of Techniques , 1982, Medical care.

[4]  D. Roter,et al.  Health education theory: an application to the process of patient-provider communication. , 1991, Health education research.

[5]  P. Holloway,et al.  An analysis of audio-recordings of general dental practitioners' consultations with adolescent patients , 1994, British Dental Journal.

[6]  J. de Haes,et al.  Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. , 1995, Social science & medicine.

[7]  Howard Waitzkin,et al.  The Politics of Medical Encounters: How Patients and Doctors Deal With Social Problems , 1991 .

[8]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Task Versus Socioemotional Behaviors in Physicians , 1987, Medical care.

[9]  P. Måseide Possibly abusive, often benign, and always necessary. On power and domination in medical practice , 1991 .

[10]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Meta-analysis of Correlates of Provider Behavior in Medical Encounters , 1988, Medical care.

[11]  J. Shymansky,et al.  Medical Communication Behavior System: An Interactional Analysis System for Medical Interactions , 1986, Medical care.

[12]  I Heszen-Klemens,et al.  Doctor-patient interaction, patients' health behavior and effects of treatment. , 1984, Social science & medicine.

[13]  H. Winefield,et al.  Verbal interactions in general practice. Information, support and doctor satisfaction. , 1992, The Medical journal of Australia.

[14]  J. Bensing Doctor-patient communication and the quality of care. , 1991, Social science & medicine.

[15]  M. Lipkin,et al.  Sex Differences in Patients' and Physicians' Communication During Primary Care Medical Visits , 1991, Medical care.

[16]  D. Roter Patient question asking in physician-patient interaction. , 1984, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[17]  Byrne,et al.  Doctors Talking to Patients , 1984 .

[18]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Doctors Talking With Patients/Patients Talking With Doctors: Improving Communication in Medical Visits , 1992 .

[19]  D. Roter Patient Participation in the Patient-Provider Interaction: The Effects of Patient Question Asking on the Quality of Interaction, Satisfaction and Compliance* , 1977, Health education monographs.

[20]  A. Sheiham,et al.  Relation between Clinical Dental Status and Subjective Impacts on Daily Living , 1995, Journal of dental research.

[21]  H Hausen,et al.  Patients' expectations of an ideal dentist and their views concerning the dentist they visited: do the views conform to the expectations and what determines how well they conform? , 1996, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[22]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Communication of affect between patient and physician. , 1981, Journal of health and social behavior.

[23]  W. Kukull,et al.  Outcome-Based Doctor-Patient Interaction Analysis: II. Identifying Effective Provider and Patient Behavior , 1982, Medical care.

[24]  J. Bensing,et al.  Instrumental and Affective Aspects of Physician Behavior , 1992, Medical care.

[25]  H. Winefield,et al.  Process and outcomes in general practice consultations: problems in defining high quality care. , 1995, Social science & medicine.

[26]  M. Stewart,et al.  What is a successful doctor-patient interview? A study of interactions and outcomes. , 1984, Social science & medicine.

[27]  B. Söderfeldt,et al.  Dentist-patient communication: a review of relevant models. , 1997, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[28]  R. Moretti Nonverbal Communication Skills of Dentists, Patient Anxiety, and Patient Satisfaction with Treatment , 1981 .

[29]  E. Söderling,et al.  Growth of xylitol-resistant versus xylitol-sensitive Streptococcus mutans strains in saliva. , 1998, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.