Development, printability and post-curing studies of formulations of materials resistant to microbial attachment for use in inkjet based 3D printing

Purpose: This paper aims to print 3D structures from polymers that resist bacterial attachment by reactive jetting of acrylate monomers. Design/methodology/approach: The first step towards printing was ink development. Inks were characterised to carry out an estimation of their potential printability using the Z parameter to predict stable jetting conditions. Printability conditions were optimised for each ink using a Dimatix DMP-2800, which enabled 3D structures to be fabricated. Findings: UV photo-initiated polymers, which resist bacterial attachment, were found to be printable using piezo-based inkjet printers. The waveform required for each ink depends on the value of the Z parameter. Once the waveform and the printability parameters were optimised, 3D objects were fabricated. Research limitations/implications: This methodology has been confirmed as an effective method to 3D print materials that have been demonstrated to be bacteria resistant. However, ink curing depends on modification of some parameters (such as photoinitiator concentration or UV exposure time) which would result in an improvement of the curing process post jetting. Social implications: The combination of inkjet based 3D printing with new materials resistant to bacterial attachment means the possibility of building customised medical devices with a high level of complexity and bespoke features can be fully realised. The scope and variability of the devices produced will exceed what can be achieved using standard fabrication methodologies and can be applied to reduce the incidence of device associated infections and to address increased morbidity, mortality and health care costs associated with nosocomial infections. Originality/value: In this paper, the novel use of materials that resist bacterial attachment has been described to build 3D structures using material jetting. Its value lies on the potential impact this methodology could produce in the biomedical device and research fields.

[1]  J. D. Berry,et al.  Measurement of surface and interfacial tension using pendant drop tensiometry. , 2015, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[2]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Surface-modified nanoparticles as a new, versatile, and mechanically robust nonadhesive coating: suppression of protein adsorption and bacterial adhesion. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[3]  J. Costerton,et al.  Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. , 1999, Science.

[4]  C. Edmiston,et al.  Activity of antibacterial impregnated central venous catheters against Klebsiella pneumoniae , 2002, Intensive Care Medicine.

[5]  C. M. Li,et al.  A polycationic antimicrobial and biocompatible hydrogel with microbe membrane suctioning ability. , 2011, Nature materials.

[6]  Brian Derby,et al.  Ink Jet Deposition of Ceramic Suspensions: Modeling and Experiments of Droplet Formation , 2000 .

[7]  Z. Tehrani,et al.  3D additive manufacture of oral and maxillofacial surgical models for preoperative planning , 2014 .

[8]  M Cristina L Martins,et al.  Covalent immobilization of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) onto biomaterial surfaces. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[9]  Anthony W Smith,et al.  Biofilms and antibiotic therapy: is there a role for combating bacterial resistance by the use of novel drug delivery systems? , 2005, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[10]  E. A. Guggenheim The Principle of Corresponding States , 1945 .

[11]  Robert Langer,et al.  Combinatorial discovery of polymers resistant to bacterial attachment , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[12]  G. O’Toole,et al.  The developmental model of microbial biofilms: ten years of a paradigm up for review. , 2009, Trends in microbiology.

[13]  A. Ganser,et al.  Efficacy of a Benzalkonium Chloride-Impregnated Central Venous Catheter to Prevent Catheter-Associated Infection in Cancer Patients , 2000, Chemotherapy.

[14]  Benjamin M Wu,et al.  Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials , 2015, Journal of Biological Engineering.

[15]  Shaoyi Jiang,et al.  Inhibition of bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation on zwitterionic surfaces. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[16]  F. Guittard,et al.  Synthesis and antimicrobial properties of polymerizable quaternary ammoniums. , 2009, European journal of medicinal chemistry.

[17]  B. Derby Inkjet Printing of Functional and Structural Materials: Fluid Property Requirements, Feature Stability, and Resolution , 2010 .

[18]  J. E. Fromm,et al.  Numerical calculation of the fluid dynamics of drop-on-demand jets , 1984 .

[19]  Robert Langer,et al.  Discovery of Novel Materials with Broad Resistance to Bacterial Attachment Using Combinatorial Polymer Microarrays , 2013, Advanced materials.

[20]  D. Guay An Update on the Role of Nitrofurans in the Management of Urinary Tract Infections , 2012, Drugs.

[21]  O. Wenker,et al.  Comparison of Two Antimicrobial—Impregnated Central Venous Catheters , 1999 .