Information Communities: The Network Structure of Communication

This study puts forward a variable clique overlap model for identifying information communities, or potentially overlapping subgroups of network actors among whom reinforced independent links ensure efficient communication. We posit that the intensity of communication between individuals in information communities is greater than in other areas of the network. Empirical tests show that the variable clique overlap model is more useful for identifying groups of individuals that have strong internal relationships in closed networks than those defined by more general models of network closure. These findings extend the scope of network closure effects proposed by other researchers working with communication networks using social network methods and approaches, a tradition which emphasizes ties between organizations, groups, individuals, and the external environment.

[1]  D. Harrison,et al.  TIES, LEADERS, AND TIME IN TEAMS: STRONG INFERENCE ABOUT NETWORK STRUCTURE'S EFFECTS ON TEAM VIABILITY AND PERFORMANCE , 2006 .

[2]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  The World is Not Small for Everyone: Inequity in Searching for Knowledge in Organizations , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[3]  D. R. White,et al.  Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups , 2003 .

[4]  R. J. Mokken,et al.  Cliques, clubs and clans , 1979 .

[5]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers , 2004 .

[6]  V. Murray,et al.  Why the Human Resources Management Function Fails , 1984 .

[7]  R. Daft,et al.  Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems , 1984 .

[8]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Theoretical Foundations for Centrality Measures , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Control through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management , 1990 .

[10]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[11]  A. Stinchcombe Information and Organizations , 2019 .

[12]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[13]  Sharon L. Milgram,et al.  The Small World Problem , 1967 .

[14]  M E J Newman,et al.  Modularity and community structure in networks. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[16]  S. Borgatti,et al.  LS sets, lambda sets and other cohesive subsets , 1990 .

[17]  Ajay Mehra,et al.  The Social Networks of High and Low Self-Monitors: Implications for Workplace Performance , 2001 .

[18]  N. Lin Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action , 2001 .

[19]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[20]  J. Coleman Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[21]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Network Analysis in the Social Sciences , 2009, Science.

[22]  S. Borgatti,et al.  Making Invisible Work Visible: Using Social Network Analysis to Support Strategic Collaboration , 2002 .

[23]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[24]  Joseph S. Bermudez,et al.  North Korean Policy Elites , 2004 .

[25]  John Scott What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[26]  Stanley Milgram,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Small World Problem , 1969 .

[27]  Gabriel Szulanski,et al.  Diffusion of innovations within organizations: electronic switching in the Bell system , 1997 .

[28]  P. Killworth,et al.  The reversal small-world experiment , 1978 .

[29]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Competing for Attention in Knowledge Markets: Electronic Document Dissemination in a Management Consulting Company , 2001 .

[30]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[31]  J. Jacobs The Death and Life of Great American Cities , 1962 .

[32]  Stephen B. Seidman,et al.  Network structure and minimum degree , 1983 .

[33]  Stephen B. Seidman,et al.  A graph‐theoretic generalization of the clique concept* , 1978 .

[34]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[35]  G. Robinson Syria's Long Civil War , 2012 .

[36]  M. Newman,et al.  Why social networks are different from other types of networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[37]  D. Watts Networks, Dynamics, and the Small‐World Phenomenon1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[38]  R. Luce,et al.  Connectivity and generalized cliques in sociometric group structure , 1950, Psychometrika.

[39]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizations and Communication Technology , 1990 .

[40]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Progress, problems and prospects for network research: Investigating relationships in the age of electronic communication technologies , 1987 .

[41]  M E J Newman,et al.  Community structure in social and biological networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Quantifying social group evolution , 2007, Nature.

[43]  R. Luce,et al.  A method of matrix analysis of group structure , 1949, Psychometrika.

[44]  B. Wellman The Community Question: The Intimate Networks of East Yorkers , 1979, American Journal of Sociology.

[45]  H. Simon,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .

[46]  Ruth N. Bolton,et al.  A Dynamic Model of the Duration of the Customer's Relationship with a Continuous Service Provider: The Role of Satisfaction , 1994 .

[47]  S. Borgatti,et al.  Analyzing Clique Overlap , 2009 .

[48]  Leo Katz,et al.  A Matrix Approach to the Analysis of Sociometric Data: Preliminary Report , 1946 .

[49]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society , 2005, Nature.

[50]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[51]  David Lazer,et al.  The Network Structure of Exploration and Exploitation , 2007 .

[52]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[53]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Organizational Social Network Research: Core Ideas and Key Debates , 2010 .

[54]  R. Guimerà,et al.  The worldwide air transportation network: Anomalous centrality, community structure, and cities' global roles , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .

[56]  B. Wellman,et al.  Networks, Neighborhoods, and Communities , 1979 .

[57]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[58]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Diversity and complexity of HIV-1 drug resistance: A bioinformatics approach to predicting phenotype from genotype , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  Gergely Palla,et al.  Preferential attachment of communities: The same principle, but a higher level , 2006 .

[60]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Algorithms for Clustering Data , 1988 .

[61]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Competing in groups , 2004 .

[62]  Adam M. Kleinbaum MEASURING MAIL: NEW ANALYSES OF E-MAIL DATA FOR THE STUDY OF CROSS-DIVISIONAL INNOVATION. , 2006 .

[63]  Dimitrina S. Dimitrova,et al.  Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community , 1996 .

[64]  Corey C. Phelps,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[65]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies , 2002 .

[66]  Linton C. Freeman,et al.  The Sociological Concept of "Group": An Empirical Test of Two Models , 1992, American Journal of Sociology.

[67]  Henrik Bresman,et al.  External Learning Activities and Team Performance: A Multimethod Field Study , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[68]  Kathleen M. Carley A Theory of Group Stability , 1991 .

[69]  S. Borgatti The Key Player Problem , 2002 .

[70]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Resolution limit in community detection , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[71]  B. Wellman,et al.  Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[72]  E. Bellin The Robustness of Authoritarianism in the Middle East: Exceptionalism in Comparative Perspective , 2004 .

[73]  T. S. Evans,et al.  Clique graphs and overlapping communities , 2010, ArXiv.

[74]  R. Alba A graph‐theoretic definition of a sociometric clique† , 1973 .

[75]  Alex Arenas,et al.  The real communication network behind the formal chart: Community structure in organizations , 2006 .