The Pleasantness of Visual Symmetry: Always, Never or Sometimes

There is evidence of a preference for visual symmetry. This is true from mate selection in the animal world to the aesthetic appreciation of works of art. It has been proposed that this preference is due to processing fluency, which engenders positive affect. But is visual symmetry pleasant? Evidence is mixed as explicit preferences show that this is the case. In contrast, implicit measures show that visual symmetry does not spontaneously engender positive affect but it depends on participants intentionally assessing visual regularities. In four experiments using variants of the affective priming paradigm, we investigated when visual symmetry engenders positive affect. Findings showed that, when no Stroop-like effects or post-lexical mechanisms enter into play, visual symmetry spontaneously elicits positive affect and results in affective congruence effects.

[1]  B. Payne,et al.  Intention Invention and the Affect Misattribution Procedure , 2013, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[2]  P Wenderoth,et al.  The Salience of Vertical Symmetry , 1994, Perception.

[3]  Stefan Van Dongen,et al.  Associations between asymmetry and human attractiveness: Possible direct effects of asymmetry and signatures of publication bias. , 2011 .

[4]  M. Heil,et al.  Role of working memory load on selective attention to affectively valent information , 2007 .

[5]  C. Olivers,et al.  Symmetry and selective attention: A dissociation between effortless perception and serial search , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  H. Barlow,et al.  The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays , 1979, Vision Research.

[7]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[8]  L. Harris,et al.  Symmetrical decorations enhance the attractiveness of faces and abstract designs , 2006 .

[9]  Roland Deutsch,et al.  Response Interference as a Mechanism Underlying Implicit Measures Some Traps and Gaps in the Assessment of Mental Associations with Experimental Paradigms , 2008 .

[10]  D. Wentura,et al.  The “meddling-in” of affective information: A general model of automatic evaluation effects , 2003 .

[11]  P. Winkielman,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Prototypes Are Attractive Because They Are Easy on the Mind , 2022 .

[12]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Grouping by closure influences subjective regularity and implicit preference , 2012, i-Perception.

[13]  M. Bradley,et al.  Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Instruction Manual and Affective Ratings , 1999 .

[14]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Symmetry perception and affective responses: A combined EEG/EMG study , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Sascha Topolinski,et al.  The face of fluency: Semantic coherence automatically elicits a specific pattern of facial muscle reactions , 2009 .

[16]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Perceptual fluency, preference, and evolution , 2006 .

[17]  R. Banse,et al.  Investigating the mechanisms underlying affective priming effects using a conditional pronunciation task. , 2006, Experimental psychology.

[18]  Thomas Jacobsen,et al.  Electrophysiological indices of processing aesthetics: Spontaneous or intentional processes? , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[19]  M. Sääksjärvi,et al.  Extending the Implicit Association Test (IAT): Assessing Consumer Attitudes Based on Multi-Dimensional Implicit Associations , 2011, PloS one.

[20]  Mirja Tenhunen,et al.  Faster Choice-Reaction Times to Positive than to Negative Facial Expressions: The Role of Cognitive , 2003 .

[21]  Daniel Danner,et al.  Why positive information is processed faster: the density hypothesis. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Innes C. Cuthill,et al.  Preference for symmetric males by female zebra finches , 1994, Nature.

[23]  Rainer Banse,et al.  The Affect Misattribution Procedure: hot or not? , 2012, Emotion.

[24]  C W Tyler,et al.  Empirical aspects of symmetry perception. , 1995, Spatial vision.

[25]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The Automatic Evaluation of Novel Stimuli , 2002, Psychological science.

[26]  S. Palmer,et al.  Orientation and symmetry: effects of multiple, rotational, and near symmetries. , 1978, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[27]  J. Friedenberg,et al.  Contour symmetry detection: the influence of axis orientation and number of objects. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[28]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Implicit Association of Symmetry with Positive Valence, High Arousal and Simplicity , 2013 .

[29]  S. Tipper,et al.  Sensorimotor fluency influences affect: Evidence from electromyography , 2010 .

[30]  M. Bertamini,et al.  Electrophysiological responses to visuospatial regularity. , 2013, Psychophysiology.

[31]  M. Bertamini,et al.  Testing Whether and When Abstract Symmetric Patterns Produce Affective Responses , 2013, PloS one.

[32]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  D. Yves von Cramon,et al.  Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty , 2006, NeuroImage.

[34]  Magnus Enquist,et al.  Symmetry, beauty and evolution , 1994, Nature.

[35]  M Kubovy,et al.  Detection of symmetry and perceptual organization: the way a lock-and-key process works. , 1997, Acta psychologica.

[36]  Rolf Reber,et al.  Exploring “fringe” consciousness: The subjective experience of perceptual fluency and its objective bases , 2004, Consciousness and Cognition.

[37]  Jan De Houwer,et al.  Robust affective priming effects in a conditional pronunciation task: Evidence for the semantic representation of evaluative information , 2004, Cognition & emotion.

[38]  Stephen E. Palmer,et al.  Orientation and symmetry: effects of multiple, rotational, and near symmetries. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  T. Jacobsen,et al.  Descriptive and evaluative judgment processes: Behavioral and electrophysiological indices of processing symmetry and aesthetics , 2003, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[40]  Olesya Govorun,et al.  An inkblot for attitudes: affect misattribution as implicit measurement. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[42]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  Deborah L. Hall,et al.  Bulletin Personality and Social Psychology a Process Model of Affect Misattribution on Behalf Of: Society for Personality and Social Psychology , 2022 .

[44]  Claus-Christian Carbon,et al.  The aesthetic aha: on the pleasure of having insights into Gestalt. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[45]  Jochen Musch,et al.  Affective priming: Findings and theories. , 2003 .

[46]  R. Arnheim Art and Visual Perception, a Psychology of the Creative Eye , 1967 .

[47]  David M. Sanbonmatsu,et al.  On the automatic activation of attitudes. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[48]  B. Carretti,et al.  Examining an emotion enhancement effect in working memory: Evidence from age-related differences , 2013, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[49]  N. Turk-Browne,et al.  Attention Is Spontaneously Biased Toward Regularities , 2013, Psychological science.

[50]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty , 1998 .

[51]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review , 2007 .

[52]  Ernst Mach,et al.  The analysis of sensations and the relation of the physical to the psychical , 1914, The Mathematical Gazette.

[53]  J. Wagemans,et al.  Detection of visual symmetries. , 1995, Spatial vision.

[54]  Vicky G Bruce,et al.  Violations of Symmetry and Repetition in Visual Patterns , 1975 .

[55]  W. Glaser,et al.  Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[56]  A. Lueschow,et al.  Dissociation of facial attractiveness and distinctiveness processing in congenital prosopagnosia , 2010 .

[57]  Zygmunt Pizlo,et al.  A computational model that recovers the 3D shape of an object from a single 2D retinal representation , 2009, Vision Research.

[58]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[59]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Implicit affective evaluation of visual symmetry. , 2012, Emotion.

[60]  Sascha Topolinski,et al.  Moving the Eye of the Beholder , 2010, Psychological science.

[61]  Leonard L. Martin,et al.  Assimilation and contrast as a function of people's willingness and ability to expend effort in forming an impression. , 1990 .

[62]  A. Møller,et al.  Female swallow preference for symmetrical male sexual ornaments , 1992, Nature.

[63]  F. Royer,et al.  Detection of symmetry. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[64]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Reporting Intentional Rating of the Primes Predicts Priming Effects in the Affective Misattribution Procedure , 2012, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[65]  H. C. Williams,et al.  Symmetries of culture , 1990, The Mathematical Gazette.

[66]  M. Ross Quillian,et al.  Retrieval time from semantic memory , 1969 .