Challenges Facing Public Sector Management in an Era of Downsizing, Devolution, Dispersion and Empowerment—and Accountability?

Agencies at all levels of government are facing strong ideological pressures to downsize, devolve, dispense, and empower both employees and recipients of services. These ideological pressures provide many performance advantages, but collectively they threaten historic notions of achieving economy, efficiency, and effectiveness, along with accountability. It has been widely assumed in recent years that advancements in information technology and performance measurement provide adequate replacements for the historic notion that accountability flows up-the-hierarchy to elected officials and the sovereignty. These technologies, however, are not yet able to ensure responsible administration or accountability in many areas of domestic government services. Today's public managers can play leading roles in developing alternative approaches for achieving accountability if they are supported by forward-looking human resources management (HRM) agencies.

[1]  R. Behn.  The Big Questions of Public Management , 1995 .

[2]  P. Light.  The Tides of Reform: Making Government Work, 1945-1994 , 1997 .

[3]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Cultures of Work Organizations. , 1992 .

[4]  J. Handler.  Down from Bureaucracy: The Ambiguity of Privatization and Empowerment , 1997 .

[5]  E. Savas,et al.  Privatizing the public sector : how to shrink government , 1982 .

[6]  J. S. Ott,et al.  Important but largely unanswered questions about accountability in contracted public human services , 2000 .

[7]  Lisa A. Dicke,et al.  Public Sector Reform, and Moral and Ethical Accountability: Performance Measurement Technology Cannot Ensure Accountability for Contracted Human Services , 2001 .

[8]  M. Weisbord,et al.  Productive workplaces : organizing and managing for dignity, meaning, and community , 1987 .

[9]  James H. Donnelly,et al.  Fundamentals of Management , 1984 .

[10]  E. Lawler,et al.  The empowerment of service workers: what, why, how, and when. , 1992, Sloan management review.

[11]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system , 1996 .

[12]  Allan W. Lerner,et al.  Bureaucracy, Organizational Redundancy, and the Privatization of Public Services , 1995 .

[13]  David E. McNabb,et al.  Culture, Climate, and Total Quality Management: Measuring Readiness for Change , 1995 .

[14]  G. Ronald Gilbert,et al.  Beyond Participative Management: Toward Total Employee Empowerment for Quality , 1991 .

[15]  Jay M. Shafritz,et al.  Toward a Definition of Organizational Incompetence: A Neglected Variable in Organization Theory , 1994 .

[16]  Michael E. Pacanowsky,et al.  Organizational communication as cultural performance , 1983 .

[17]  J. S. Ott.  The Organizational culture perspective , 1989 .

[18]  E. Suchman.  Evaluative Research: Principles and Practice in Public Service and Social Action Progr , 1968 .

[19]  Ed Musselwhite,et al.  Self Directed Work Teams: The New American Challenge , 1990 .

[20]  Lisa A. Dicke,et al.  Public Agency Accountability in Human Services Contracting , 1999 .

[21]  Denis Johnston,et al.  5th Generation Management , 1991 .

[22]  J. Donahue.  The Privatization Decision: Public Ends, Private Means , 1991 .

[23]  Charldean Newell,et al.  Better, Faster, Stronger , 1999 .

[24]  Geert Bouckaert,et al.  Measurement and Meaningful Management , 1993 .

[25]  B. Guy Peters,et al.  The Future of Governing: Four Emerging Models , 1996 .

[26]  A. Farazmand.  The Elite Question , 1999 .

[27]  Measuring Public Sector Effectiveness Using Private Sector Methods , 1998 .

[28]  Melvin J. Dubnick,et al.  Accountability in the Public Sector: Lessons from the Challenger Tragedy , 1987 .

[29]  Avner Ben-Ner,et al.  Nonprofits for Hire: The Welfare State in the Age of Contracting , 1993 .

[30]  Jay M. Shafritz.  The HarperCollins dictionary of American government and politics , 1992 .

[31]  Jonas Prager,et al.  Privatizing Local Government Operations: Lessons from Federal Contracting out Methodology , 1996 .

[32]  R. Kearney,et al.  Reinventing Government, The New Public Management and Civil Service Systems in International Perspective , 1998 .

[33]  J. F. Volkwein,et al.  The Cultural Approach to the Formation of Organizational Climate , 1992 .

[34]  A. Zauberman,et al.  The new economics , 1965 .

[35]  Joanne D. Martin,et al.  12 – The Role of Symbolic Management: How Can Managers Effectively Transmit Organizational Culture? , 1984 .

[36]  Kevin P. Kearns,et al.  Managing for Accountability: Preserving the Public Trust in Public and Nonprofit Organizations , 1996 .

[37]  Holding Government Bureaucracies Accountable , 1981 .

[38]  Montgomery Van Wart,et al.  Changing Public Sector Values , 1998 .

[39]  Elaine Morley.  A practitioner's guide to public sector productivity improvement , 1986 .

[40]  Leslie Lenkowsky,et al.  Reinventing Government: The Case of National Service , 2000 .

[41]  S. Cohen.  Defining and Measuring Effectiveness in Public Management , 1993 .

[42]  Marc Holzer,et al.  Government at Work: Best Practices and Model Programs , 1997 .

[43]  Russell Stout.  Management or Control: The Organizational Challenge , 1980 .

[44]  G. Ronald Gilbert.  Quality Improvement in a Federal Defense Organization , 1992 .

[45]  David N. Ammons.  The Role of Professional Associations in Establishing and Promoting Performance Standards for Local Government , 1994 .

[46]  Paul D. Epstein.  Using Performance Measurement in Local Government: A Guide to Improving Decisions, Performance, and Accountability , 1984 .

[47]  Michael Barzelay,et al.  Breaking through bureaucracy : a new vision for managing in government , 1992 .

[48]  R. Eccles.  The performance measurement manifesto. , 1991, Harvard business review.

[49]  Performance Measurement in the Central Government Departments of the Netherlands , 1993 .

[50]  John M. Kamensky.  Program Performance Measures: Designing a System to Manage for Results , 1993 .