Secondary research use of personal medical data: attitudes from patient and population surveys in The Netherlands and Germany

[1]  Thomas Ploug,et al.  The ‘Expiry Problem’ of broad consent for biobank research - And why a meta consent model solves it , 2020, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[2]  S. Kalkman,et al.  Patients’ and public views and attitudes towards the sharing of health data for research: a narrative review of the empirical evidence , 2019, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[3]  Markus K. Labude,et al.  An Ethics Framework for Big Data in Health and Research , 2019, Asian Bioethics Review.

[4]  Chih-Hsing Ho,et al.  Building trust and transparency? Challenges of the opt-out system and the secondary use of health data in England , 2019, Medical Law International.

[5]  W. Lieb,et al.  Patient views on research use of clinical data without consent: Legal, but also acceptable? , 2019, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[6]  Mariarosaria Taddeo,et al.  Enabling Posthumous Medical Data Donation: An Appeal for the Ethical Utilisation of Personal Health Data , 2018, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[7]  Barbara Prainsack,et al.  Data Donation: How to Resist the iLeviathan , 2019, Philosophical Studies Series.

[8]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  Ethical Medical Data Donation: A Pressing Issue , 2019, Philosophical Studies Series.

[9]  S. Semler,et al.  German Medical Informatics Initiative , 2018, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[10]  E. McColl,et al.  Systematic review of participants’ attitudes towards data sharing: a thematic synthesis , 2018, Journal of health services research & policy.

[11]  Katherine Weatherford Darling,et al.  Solidarity in biomedicine and beyond , 2018 .

[12]  E. Morand,et al.  Acceptability of opt‐out consent in a hospital patient population , 2018, Internal medicine journal.

[13]  W. Lieb,et al.  Broad consent for health care–embedded biobanking: understanding and reasons to donate in a large patient sample , 2017, Genetics in Medicine.

[14]  Rieke van der Graaf,et al.  International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research involving Humans , 2017 .

[15]  Daniel Strech,et al.  Access policies in biobank research: what criteria do they include and how publicly available are they? A cross-sectional study , 2016, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[16]  A. Buyx,et al.  Breite Einwilligung (broad consent) zur Biobank-Forschung – die ethische Debatte , 2016, Ethik in der Medizin.

[17]  H. Bauchner,et al.  Sharing Clinical Trial Data: A Proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors , 2016, PLoS medicine.

[18]  Erik Schultes,et al.  The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship , 2016, Scientific Data.

[19]  John Fletcher,et al.  Sharing Clinical Trial Data: A Proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors , 2016, The National medical journal of India.

[20]  B. Knoppers,et al.  Harmonizing Privacy Laws to Enable International Biobank Research , 2015, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[21]  Ross J. Anderson,et al.  The collection, linking and use of data in biomedical research and health care: ethical issues , 2015 .

[22]  Pam Carter,et al.  The social licence for research: why care.data ran into trouble , 2015, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[23]  World Medical Association (WMA),et al.  Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects , 2009, Journal of the Indian Medical Association.

[24]  Zhan Su,et al.  THE APPLICABILITY OF WIDELY EMPLOYED FRAMEWORKS IN CROSS-CULTURAL MANAGEMENT RESEARCH , 2009 .

[25]  D. Spini,et al.  Measurement Equivalence Of 10 Value Types From The Schwartz Value Survey Across 21 Countries , 2003 .