Covering-based variable precision fuzzy rough sets with PROMETHEE-EDAS methods

Abstract This paper proposes a reflexive fuzzy β -neighborhood operator by modifying Ma’s fuzzy β -neighborhood operators. Then, we use such an operator to build a covering-based variable precision fuzzy rough set (CVPFRS) model that can deal with the issue of misclassifications and perturbations in decision-making problems. By combining the CVPFRS model with two traditional decision-making methods (the PROMETHE method and the DEAS method), we introduce a novel method for addressing multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) problems. An illustrative example is utilized to demonstrate the practicality of the proposed method. The effectiveness of the proposed method is validated by comparing it with existing methods. By virtue of the cross-validation and hypothesis testing, we give an experimental analysis to interpret the validity and stability of the proposed method.

[1]  Gang Chen,et al.  Pythagorean fuzzy preference ranking organization method of enrichment evaluations , 2019, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[2]  Kai Zhang,et al.  Fuzzy β-covering based (I, T)-fuzzy rough set models and applications to multi-attribute decision-making , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[3]  Hui Gao,et al.  Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution Method for Multiple Criteria Group Decision Making under Picture 2-Tuple Linguistic Environment , 2019, Mathematics.

[4]  Jianming Zhan,et al.  Covering-Based Variable Precision $(\mathcal {I},\mathcal {T})$-Fuzzy Rough Sets With Applications to Multiattribute Decision-Making , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[5]  Chris Cornelis,et al.  Fuzzy neighborhood operators based on fuzzy coverings , 2017, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[6]  Ming-Wen Shao,et al.  Fuzzy rough set-based attribute reduction using distance measures , 2019, Knowl. Based Syst..

[7]  Chris Cornelis,et al.  A comprehensive study of fuzzy covering-based rough set models: Definitions, properties and interrelationships , 2017, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[8]  Bin Yang,et al.  Communication between fuzzy information systems using fuzzy covering-based rough sets , 2018, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[9]  Sang-Eon Han,et al.  Roughness measures of locally finite covering rough sets , 2019, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[10]  Wojciech Ziarko,et al.  Variable Precision Rough Set Model , 1993, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[11]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Relational Interpretations of Neigborhood Operators and Rough Set Approximation Operators , 1998, Inf. Sci..

[12]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using a New Method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) , 2015, Informatica.

[13]  Xiaonan Li,et al.  Three-way decisions approach to multiple attribute group decision making with linguistic information-based decision-theoretic rough fuzzy set , 2018, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[14]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  A Decision Theoretic Framework for Approximating Concepts , 1992, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[15]  Degang Chen,et al.  The Model of Fuzzy Variable Precision Rough Sets , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[16]  Ivan Petrovic,et al.  Modification of the Best-Worst and MABAC methods: A novel approach based on interval-valued fuzzy-rough numbers , 2018, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Jerzy W. Grzymala-Busse,et al.  Rough Sets , 1995, Commun. ACM.

[18]  Liwen Ma,et al.  Two fuzzy covering rough set models and their generalizations over fuzzy lattices , 2016, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[19]  Morteza Yazdani,et al.  Intuitionistic fuzzy edas method: an application to solid waste disposal site selection , 2017 .

[20]  J. Harsanyi Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility , 1955 .

[21]  W. Zakowski APPROXIMATIONS IN THE SPACE (U,π) , 1983 .

[22]  M. Goumas,et al.  An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy Choquet integral based TOPSIS method for multi-criteria group decision making , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  William Zhu,et al.  Topological approaches to covering rough sets , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[25]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS: THE PROMETHEE METHOD , 1986 .

[26]  Hamido Fujita,et al.  Enhancing PROMETHEE method with intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets , 2020, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[27]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Multi-attribute decision making methods based on reference ideal theory with probabilistic hesitant information , 2019, Expert Syst. Appl..

[28]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Probabilistic Rough Sets , 2015, Handbook of Computational Intelligence.

[29]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Expected consistency-based emergency decision making with incomplete probabilistic linguistic preference relations , 2019, Knowl. Based Syst..

[30]  Bin Yang,et al.  A fuzzy covering-based rough set model and its generalization over fuzzy lattice , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[31]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  A novel hesitant fuzzy EDAS method and its application to hospital selection , 2018, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[32]  Hui Wang,et al.  Granular Computing Based on Fuzzy Similarity Relations , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics.

[33]  Anna Maria Radzikowska,et al.  A comparative study of fuzzy rough sets , 2002, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[34]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  The new extension of TOPSIS method for multiple criteria decision making with hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy sets , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..

[35]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications - Two decades review from 1994 to 2014 , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[36]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Covering based rough set approximations , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[37]  Bao Qing Hu,et al.  Granular variable precision fuzzy rough sets with general fuzzy relations , 2015, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[38]  K. S. Ravichandran,et al.  A new extension to PROMETHEE under intuitionistic fuzzy environment for solving supplier selection problem with linguistic preferences , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..

[39]  Adjei Peter Darko,et al.  Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making with modified EDAS method , 2020, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[40]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  TOPSIS method based on a fuzzy covering approximation space: An application to biological nano-materials selection , 2019, Inf. Sci..

[41]  Jiye Liang,et al.  Multi-granularity three-way decisions with adjustable hesitant fuzzy linguistic multigranulation decision-theoretic rough sets over two universes , 2020, Inf. Sci..

[42]  L. Anojkumar,et al.  Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for pipe material selection in sugar industry , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[43]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Extended EDAS Method for Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-making: An Application to Supplier Selection , 2016, Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control.

[44]  Qingguo Li,et al.  A characterization of novel rough fuzzy sets of information systems and their application in decision making , 2019, Expert Syst. Appl..

[45]  Bao Qing Hu,et al.  Dominance-based rough fuzzy set approach and its application to rule induction , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[46]  Decui Liang,et al.  Three-way decisions in ordered decision system , 2017, Knowl. Based Syst..

[47]  D. Dubois,et al.  ROUGH FUZZY SETS AND FUZZY ROUGH SETS , 1990 .

[48]  Xizhao Wang,et al.  On the generalization of fuzzy rough sets , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[49]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Multi-criteria decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy PROMETHEE , 2014, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..