EEG correlates of cognitive time scales in the Necker-Zeno model for bistable perception

The Necker-Zeno model of bistable perception provides a formal relation between the average duration of meta-stable percepts (dwell times T) of ambiguous figures and two other basic time scales (t0, ΔT) underlying cognitive processing. The model predicts that dwell times T covary with t0, ΔT or both. We tested this prediction by exploiting that observers, in particular experienced meditators, can volitionally control dwell times T. Meditators and non-meditators observed bistable Necker cubes either passively or tried to hold their current percept. The latencies of a centro-parietal event-related potential (CPP) were recorded as a physiological correlate of t0. Dwell times T and the CPP latencies, correlated with t0, differed between conditions and observer groups, while ΔT remained constant in the range predicted by the model. The covariation of CPP latencies and dwell times, as well as their quadratic functional dependence extends previous psychophysical confirmation of the Necker-Zeno model to psychophysiological measures.

[1]  Michael Bach,et al.  Early neural activity in Necker-cube reversal: evidence for low-level processing of a gestalt phenomenon. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[2]  S. Kelly,et al.  The classic P300 encodes a build‐to‐threshold decision variable , 2015, The European journal of neuroscience.

[3]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  Enduring interest in perceptual ambiguity: alternating views of reversible figures. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  Daniel Strüber,et al.  Voluntary control of Necker cube reversals modulates the EEG delta- and gamma-band response , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[5]  S. Nieuwenhuis,et al.  Mental Training Affects Distribution of Limited Brain Resources , 2007, PLoS biology.

[6]  Michael Bach,et al.  Bistable perception -- along the processing chain from ambiguous visual input to a stable percept. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[7]  Michael Bach,et al.  Multistable perception: When bottom-up and top-down coincide , 2009, Brain and Cognition.

[8]  S. Heinrich,et al.  Frequency-domain analysis of fast oddball responses to visual stimuli: a feasibility study. , 2009, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[9]  Heiko Neumann,et al.  The first spike counts: A model for STDP learning pose specific representations for estimating view direction , 2010 .

[10]  Shirley Telles,et al.  Neurophysiological Effects of Meditation Based on Evoked and Event Related Potential Recordings , 2015, BioMed research international.

[11]  M. Bach,et al.  The Freiburg Visual Acuity test--automatic measurement of visual acuity. , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[12]  E. Sudarshan,et al.  Zeno's paradox in quantum theory , 1976 .

[13]  Massimo Riani,et al.  Stochastic Models and Fluctuations in Reversal Time of Ambiguous Figures , 1977, Perception.

[14]  R. van Ee,et al.  Early interactions between neuronal adaptation and voluntary control determine perceptual choices in bistable vision. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[15]  Michael Bach,et al.  Discontinuous presentation of ambiguous figures: how interstimulus-interval durations affect reversal dynamics and ERPs. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[16]  Michael Bach,et al.  Ambiguous Figures – What Happens in the Brain When Perception Changes But Not the Stimulus , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[17]  Irene Reppa,et al.  What's so special about the N170? Modulation of N170 by geometric shape attributes of three-dimensional (3D) objects , 2010 .

[18]  Michael Bach,et al.  Object perception: When our brain is impressed but we do not notice it , 2009 .

[19]  Sven P. Heinrich,et al.  Signal and noise in P300 recordings to visual stimuli , 2008, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[20]  R. van Ee,et al.  Percept-choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli: a low-level neural model. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[21]  Georgios A. Keliris,et al.  Introduction to Research Topic – Binocular Rivalry: A Gateway to Studying Consciousness , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[22]  V. Pascalis,et al.  Individual variability in perceptual switching behaviour is associated with reversal-related EEG modulations , 2016, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[23]  M. Wittmann,et al.  Temporal constraints of perceiving, generating, and integrating information: Clinical indications. , 1999, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[24]  Piotr Jaskowski,et al.  Evidence for an Integrative Role of P3b in Linking Reaction to Perception , 2005 .

[25]  Harald Atmanspacher,et al.  Quantum Zeno features of bistable perception , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[26]  J. Polich,et al.  Meditation states and traits: EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  J. Orbach,et al.  Reversibility of the Necker Cube: I. An Examination of the Concept of “Satiation of Orientation” , 1963, Perceptual and motor skills.

[28]  D. Linden The P300: Where in the Brain Is It Produced and What Does It Tell Us? , 2005, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[29]  P. Perakakis,et al.  Mindfulness (Vipassana) meditation: effects on P3b event-related potential and heart rate variability. , 2013, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[30]  Harald Atmanspacher,et al.  The Potential of Using Quantum Theory to Build Models of Cognition , 2013, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[31]  Alexander Wendt,et al.  Quantum Mind and Social Science: Unifying Physical and Social Ontology , 2015 .

[32]  L. A. N. Esq.,et al.  LXI. Observations on some remarkable optical phænomena seen in Switzerland; and on an optical phænomenon which occurs on viewing a figure of a crystal or geometrical solid , 1832 .

[33]  Daniel Strüber,et al.  MEG alpha activity decrease reflects destabilization of multistable percepts. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[34]  Michael A. Pitts,et al.  Gamma band activity and the P3 reflect post-perceptual processes, not visual awareness , 2014, NeuroImage.

[35]  W. Singer,et al.  Meditation Increases the Depth of Information Processing and Improves the Allocation of Attention in Space , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[36]  M. Wittmann,et al.  Subjective expansion of extended time-spans in experienced meditators , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[37]  M. Bach,et al.  Faces are more attractive than motion: evidence from two simultaneous oddball paradigms , 2014, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[38]  E. Pöppel,et al.  A hierarchical model of temporal perception , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[39]  M. Wittmann,et al.  Temporal Processing in Bistable Perception of the Necker Cube , 2015, Perception.

[40]  J. Changeux,et al.  Experimental and Theoretical Approaches to Conscious Processing , 2011, Neuron.

[41]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[42]  N. Squires,et al.  Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[43]  R. Blake © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 5 A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies , 2000 .

[44]  Michael A. Pitts,et al.  Insights from Intermittent Binocular Rivalry and EEG , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[45]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[46]  Harald Atmanspacher,et al.  A proposed test of temporal nonlocality in bistable perception , 2010 .

[47]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Meditation alters perceptual rivalry in Tibetan Buddhist monks , 2005, Current Biology.

[48]  Harald Atmanspacher,et al.  The Necker-Zeno Model for Bistable Perception , 2013, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[49]  N. N. Available World medical association declaration of Helsinki , 2000, Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine.

[50]  N. Squires,et al.  Visual evoked potentials to illusory reversals of the necker cube. , 1988, Psychophysiology.

[51]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[52]  Michael Bach,et al.  The Necker cube—an ambiguous figure disambiguated in early visual processing , 2005, Vision Research.

[53]  Ronald Olson,et al.  Reversibility of the Necker Cube: VII. Reversal Rate as a Function of Figure-on and Figure-off Durations , 1966 .

[54]  Harald Atmanspacher,et al.  Complementarity in Bistable Perception , 2009 .

[55]  Stefania Raimondo,et al.  Role of Extracellular Vesicles in Hematological Malignancies , 2015, BioMed research international.

[56]  R. Verleger Event-related potentials and cognition: A critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3 , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[57]  J. Polich Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[58]  M. Wittmann,et al.  How long is now for mindfulness meditators , 2012 .

[59]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[60]  P. H. Lindsay,et al.  Evoked Potential Correlates of Auditory Signal Detection , 1971, Science.

[61]  M. Koivisto,et al.  Perceptual reversals of Necker stimuli during intermittent presentation with limited attentional resources. , 2013, Psychophysiology.

[62]  Harald Atmanspacher,et al.  Cognitive Time Scales in a Necker-Zeno Model for Bistable Perception , 2008 .

[63]  Andrew Butcher,et al.  A lateralized auditory evoked potential elicited when auditory objects are defined by spatial motion , 2011, Hearing Research.

[64]  L. H. Pelton,et al.  Acceleration of reversals of a Necker cube. , 1968, The American journal of psychology.

[65]  Harvey Babkoff,et al.  The role of tone duration in dichotic temporal order judgment , 2013, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[66]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision , 2012 .

[67]  T W Picton,et al.  The P300 Wave of the Human Event‐Related Potential , 1992, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[68]  M. Bach,et al.  Can I trust in what I see? EEG evidence for a cognitive evaluation of perceptual constructs. , 2016, Psychophysiology.