Women and Adult Education: Rethinking Androcentric Research

This article provides a framework which can be used to analyze adult education in terms of its androcentricity, that is, its male bias. It first identifies the characteristics of androcentricity and the nature of feminist agendas. The article then explores the treatment of both discourse and power relations to illustrate the domination of the male agenda. Adult education literature which has addressed each of these areas and new directions are explored within the subsets of these two categories. The paper contends that in order to use the framework productively, theoretical analysis is required. In particular, it recommends contemporary social theories as complementary ways in which to broaden our understanding of feminist agendas.

[1]  B. Reardon.  Sexism and the War System , 2009, Spielregeln der Gewalt.

[2]  Maria J. Falco.  Feminism and Epistemology: Approaches to Research in Women and Politics , 1988 .

[3]  S. Blundell.  Gender and the curriculum of adult education , 1992 .

[4]  Margrit Eichler,et al.  Nonsexist Research Methods: A Practical Guide , 1987 .

[5]  K. Weiler,et al.  Freire and a Feminist Pedagogy of Difference , 1991 .

[6]  C. Titmus.  Lifelong education for adults : an international handbook , 1989 .

[7]  S. Parsons.  Feminist Challenges to Curriculum Design , 1990 .

[8]  Roger Hiemstra,et al.  Creating Environments for Effective Adult Learning , 1991 .

[9]  S. Rowbotham.  Women, resistance and revolution , 1972 .

[10]  Nancy Fraser,et al.  Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory , 1989 .

[11]  M. Crawford,et al.  Women and Gender: A Feminist Psychology , 1992 .

[12]  D. Smith,et al.  The everyday world as problematic , 1987 .

[13]  Wendy Ball.  Critical Social Research, Adult Education and Anti-Racist Feminist Praxis. , 1992 .

[14]  R. Lawrence,et al.  Operational Research and the Social Sciences. , 1966 .

[15]  Elisabeth Hayes,et al.  The impact of feminism on adult education publications: an analysis of British and American journals , 1992 .

[16]  Nellie Y. Mckay.  Black woman professor—White university , 1983 .

[17]  J. M. Hugo.  Adult Education History and the Issue of Gender: Toward A Different History of adult Education In America , 1990 .

[18]  C. Ramazanoglu.  Sex and Violence in Academic Life or You Can Keep a Good Woman Down , 1987 .

[19]  M. Maynard,et al.  Women, Violence and Social Control , 1987 .

[20]  D. Spender.  Man Made Language , 1980 .

[21]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Handbook of adult and continuing education , 1989 .

[22]  C. Pateman,et al.  Feminist challenges: Social and political theory , 1986 .

[23]  E. Byrne.  Women and Education , 1978 .

[24]  M. Paludi,et al.  Academic and Workplace Sexual Harassment , 1992, Violence and Victims.

[25]  E. Tisdell.  Feminism and adult learning: Power, pedagogy, and praxis , 1993 .

[26]  Joyce Stalker,et al.  Athene in academe: women mentoring women in the academy 1 , 1994 .

[27]  N. Denzin,et al.  The Research Act , 1978 .

[28]  J. Stalker.  The Adult Learner/Teacher Relationship and Sexual Harassment:De-meaning Traditions , 1994 .

[29]  G. Burrell,et al.  Sexuality of organization , 1989 .

[30]  B. Bernstein.  Theoretical Studies Towards a Sociology of Language , 1972 .