Impact of post-stroke impairments on activities and participation as experienced by stroke survivors in a Western Cape setting

Introduction: This paper explores causal connections between impairments, activity limitations and participation restrictions after stroke. Methods: The study population (N=267) of this descriptive study were public health care users, from the eastern sub-district of the Western Cape Metropole, who had a stroke between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2010. Fifty-three study participants were selected through stratified, proportional, random sampling. Data was collected using the Stroke Impact Scale-3.0; the Modified Barthel Index; the Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment and a language screening test. Spearman correlations were used to determine statistical significance. Results: The mean Stroke Impact Scale participation score was 31.3/100. Limb strength (<0.01), visual perception (<0.01), spatial perception (0.02), motor praxis (<0.01), visuomotor organisation (<0.01), and thinking operations (<0.01), impacted participation scores negatively. The mean Modified Barthel Index score was 70.58/100. Limb strength (<0.01), hand function (<0.01), visual perception (<0.01), motor praxis (<0.01), visuomotor organisation (<0.01), and thinking operations (<0.01) impacted Modified Barthel Index scores negatively. Conclusion: Motor, cognitive and perceptual impairments impacted activities and participation negatively. Stroke survivors should receive routine cognitive, perceptual and motor evaluations. The effect of intervention strategies on cognitive and perceptual impairment post-stroke must be studied. Key words Stroke, cognition, perception, activities, participation

[1]  A. Bryer,et al.  Community-based care of stroke patients in a rural African setting. , 2009, South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde.

[2]  J. Desrosiers,et al.  Visuoperceptual deficits and participation in older adults after stroke. , 2013, Australian occupational therapy journal.

[3]  W. Mudzi,et al.  The influence of demographic, environmental and physical factors on functional independence post stroke , 2008 .

[4]  H. Ring,et al.  Relationships of Cognitive Performance and Daily Function of Clients following Right Hemisphere Stroke: Predictive and Ecological Validity of the LOTCA Battery , 2000 .

[5]  B Cooper,et al.  Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  Ju n 20 03 Schrödinger ’ s Cat : The rules of engagement , 2003 .

[7]  P. Lyden,et al.  Correlations among impairment, daily activities and thinking operations after stroke. , 2013, NeuroRehabilitation.

[8]  W. Weerdt,et al.  Activity limitations of patients with stroke attending out-patient facilities in the Western Cape, South Africa , 2011 .

[9]  D. Bourbonnais,et al.  Predictors of long-term participation after stroke , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation.

[10]  W. Mudzi,et al.  Community participation of patients 12 months post-stroke in Johannesburg, South Africa , 2013, African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine.

[11]  J. Desrosiers,et al.  Differences in Participation According to Specific Cognitive Deficits Following a Stroke , 2011, Applied neuropsychology.

[12]  T. Hoffmann,et al.  Occupational therapy for cognitive impairment in stroke patients. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[13]  C. Baum,et al.  Mild Impairment of Cognition Impacts on Activity Participation after Stroke in a Community-Dwelling Australian Cohort , 2011, OTJR : occupation, participation and health.

[14]  A. Rhoda Limitations in Activity and Participation experienced by stroke patients : A Qualitative Inquiry , 2012 .

[15]  M. Hommel,et al.  Cognitive determinants of social functioning after a first ever mild to moderate stroke at vocational age , 2009, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.

[16]  B. Edwards,et al.  Internal consistency and validity of the Stroke Impact Scale 2.0 (SIS 2.0) and SIS-16 in an Australian sample , 2003, Quality of Life Research.

[17]  Marina Bosch,et al.  Stroke Rehabilitation A Function Based Approach , 2016 .

[18]  D. Wade,et al.  Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. , 1992, Current opinion in neurology and neurosurgery.

[19]  L. Hale,et al.  The experience of living with stroke in low urban and rural socioeconomic areas of South Africa , 2012 .

[20]  G. Sundelin,et al.  Positive attitudes and preserved high level of motor performance are important factors for return to work in younger persons after stroke: a national survey. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[21]  B. Tipping Issues in the long-term management of stroke , 2008 .

[22]  Koen Putman,et al.  Motor and Functional Recovery After Stroke: A Comparison of 4 European Rehabilitation Centers , 2007, Stroke.

[23]  S. Embretson,et al.  The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. , 1999, Stroke.

[24]  Subashan Perera,et al.  Persisting Consequences of Stroke Measured by the Stroke Impact Scale , 2002, Stroke.

[25]  F. J. Carod-Artal,et al.  The Stroke Impact Scale 3.0: Evaluation of Acceptability, Reliability, and Validity of the Brazilian Version , 2008, Stroke.

[26]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  The Stroke Impact Scale: Validation in a UK Setting and Development of a SIS Short Form and SIS Index , 2013, Stroke.

[27]  Gert Kwakkel,et al.  Impact of Time on Improvement of Outcome After Stroke , 2006, Stroke.