Streptavidin and its biotin complex at atomic resolution.

Atomic resolution crystallographic studies of streptavidin and its biotin complex have been carried out at 1.03 and 0.95 Å, respectively. The wild-type protein crystallized with a tetramer in the asymmetric unit, while the crystals of the biotin complex contained two subunits in the asymmetric unit. Comparison of the six subunits shows the various ways in which the protein accommodates ligand binding and different crystal-packing environments. Conformational variation is found in each of the polypeptide loops connecting the eight strands in the β-sandwich subunit, but the largest differences are found in the flexible binding loop (residues 45-52). In three of the unliganded subunits the loop is in an `open' conformation, while in the two subunits binding biotin, as well as in one of the unliganded subunits, this loop `closes' over the biotin-binding site. The `closed' loop contributes to the protein's high affinity for biotin. Analysis of the anisotropic displacement parameters included in the crystallographic models is consistent with the variation found in the loop structures and the view that the dynamic nature of the protein structure contributes to the ability of the protein to bind biotin so tightly.

[1]  Jay Painter,et al.  Electronic Reprint Biological Crystallography Optimal Description of a Protein Structure in Terms of Multiple Groups Undergoing Tls Motion Biological Crystallography Optimal Description of a Protein Structure in Terms of Multiple Groups Undergoing Tls Motion , 2005 .

[2]  E. Diamandis,et al.  The biotin-(strept)avidin system: principles and applications in biotechnology. , 1991, Clinical chemistry.

[3]  S. Voss,et al.  Mutagenesis of a flexible loop in streptavidin leads to higher affinity for the Strep-tag II peptide and improved performance in recombinant protein purification. , 1997, Protein engineering.

[4]  Early mechanistic events in biotin dissociation from streptavidin , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[5]  B. Lee,et al.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  T. Lybrand,et al.  Streptavidin-biotin binding energetics. , 1999, Biomolecular engineering.

[7]  Vincent B. Chen,et al.  Correspondence e-mail: , 2000 .

[8]  J. Bajorath,et al.  Atomic resolution studies of carbonic anhydrase II. , 2010, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[9]  K. N. Trueblood,et al.  On the rigid-body motion of molecules in crystals , 1968 .

[10]  Olli H Laitinen,et al.  Design and Construction of Highly Stable, Protease-resistant Chimeric Avidins* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  Vincent T. Moy,et al.  A streptavidin variant with slower biotin dissociation and increased mechanostability , 2010, Nature Methods.

[12]  D E McRee,et al.  XtalView/Xfit--A versatile program for manipulating atomic coordinates and electron density. , 1999, Journal of structural biology.

[13]  E A Merritt,et al.  Comparing anisotropic displacement parameters in protein structures. , 1999, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[14]  Z. Otwinowski,et al.  [20] Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[15]  P. Stayton,et al.  Structural studies of the streptavidin binding loop , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[16]  T. Lybrand,et al.  A distal point mutation in the streptavidin-biotin complex preserves structure but diminishes binding affinity: experimental evidence of electronic polarization effects? , 2010, Biochemistry.

[17]  C. Cantor,et al.  Engineering a novel, stable dimeric streptavidin with lower isoelectric point. , 2007, Journal of biotechnology.

[18]  O. Laitinen,et al.  Tetravalent single-chain avidin: from subunits to protein domains via circularly permuted avidins. , 2005, The Biochemical journal.

[19]  Terry P Lybrand,et al.  Dynamics of the streptavidin-biotin complex in solution and in its crystal lattice: distinct behavior revealed by molecular simulations. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[20]  A. Chilkoti,et al.  Site-directed mutagenesis studies of the high-affinity streptavidin-biotin complex: contributions of tryptophan residues 79, 108, and 120. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments , 2011, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[22]  S. Evoy,et al.  Electronic structure, binding energy, and solvation structure of the streptavidin-biotin supramolecular complex: ONIOM and 3D-RISM study. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[23]  C. Cantor,et al.  Characterization and crystallization of core streptavidin. , 1987, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[24]  T. Lybrand,et al.  Simulations of a protein crystal: explicit treatment of crystallization conditions links theory and experiment in the streptavidin-biotin complex. , 2008, Biochemistry.

[25]  D. Hyre,et al.  Ser45 plays an important role in managing both the equilibrium and transition state energetics of the streptavidin—biotin system , 2000, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[26]  N. Pannu,et al.  REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures , 2011, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[27]  M. DePristo,et al.  Heterogeneity and inaccuracy in protein structures solved by X-ray crystallography. , 2004, Structure.

[28]  Ethan A Merritt,et al.  Cooperative hydrogen bond interactions in the streptavidin–biotin system , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[29]  C. Cantor,et al.  Engineered single-chain dimeric streptavidins with an unexpected strong preference for biotin-4-fluorescein. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  J. W. Edmonds,et al.  Molecular structure of biotin. Results of two independent crystal structure investigations. , 1976, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[31]  Jack D. Dunitz,et al.  Atomic Dispacement Parameter Nomenclature. Report of a Subcommittee on Atomic Displacement Parameter Nomenclature , 1996 .

[32]  Jay Painter,et al.  TLSMD web server for the generation of multi-group TLS models , 2006 .

[33]  J. Thornton,et al.  PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures , 1993 .

[34]  J. Hermans,et al.  A different best rigid-body molecular fit routine , 1977 .

[35]  P. Kraulis A program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures , 1991 .

[36]  I. Korndörfer,et al.  Improved affinity of engineered streptavidin for the Strep‐tag II peptide is due to a fixed open conformation of the lid‐like loop at the binding site , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[37]  Arne Skerra,et al.  The Strep-tag system for one-step purification and high-affinity detection or capturing of proteins , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[38]  Atomic resolution structure of biotin-free Tyr43Phe streptavidin: what is in the binding site? , 1999, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[39]  P. Champ,et al.  Validation of crystallographic models containing TLS or other descriptions of anisotropy. , 2010, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[40]  J. Wendoloski,et al.  Structural origins of high-affinity biotin binding to streptavidin. , 1989, Science.

[41]  E A Merritt,et al.  Raster3D: photorealistic molecular graphics. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[42]  K. Trueblood,et al.  Correlation of Internal Torsional Motion with Overall Molecular Motion in Crystals , 1998 .

[43]  J. L. Smith,et al.  Crystal structure of core streptavidin determined from multiwavelength anomalous diffraction of synchrotron radiation. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  A. Brunger Free R value: a novel statistical quantity for assessing the accuracy of crystal structures. , 1992 .

[45]  E A Merritt,et al.  Expanding the model: anisotropic displacement parameters in protein structure refinement. , 1999, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[46]  J. J. Wendoloski,et al.  Crystallographic and thermodynamic comparison of natural and synthetic ligands bound to streptavidin , 1992 .

[47]  Ashutosh Chilkoti,et al.  Molecular Origins of the Slow Streptavidin-Biotin Dissociation Kinetics , 1995 .