Opinions of Youngsters with Congenital Below-Elbow Deficiency, and Those of Their Parents and Professionals Concerning Prosthetic Use and Rehabilitation Treatment

Background Youngsters with unilateral congenital below-elbow deficiency (UCBED) seem to function well with or without a prosthesis. Reasons for rejecting prostheses have been reported earlier, but unfortunately not those of the children themselves. Furthermore, reasons for acceptance are underexplored in the literature. Objectives To investigate opinions of children and early and late adolescents with UCBED, and those of their parents and healthcare professionals, concerning (1) reasons to wear or not to wear prostheses and (2) about rehabilitation care. Methods During one week of online focus group interviews, 42 children of 8–12 y/o, early and late adolescents of 13–16 and 17–20 y/o, 17 parents, and 19 healthcare professionals provided their opinions on various topics. This study addresses prosthetic use or non-use of prosthetics and rehabilitation care. Data were analyzed using the framework approach. Results Cosmesis was considered to be the prime factor for choosing and wearing a prosthesis, since this was deemed especially useful in avoiding stares from others. Although participants functioned well without prostheses, they agreed that it was an adjuvant in daily-life activities and sports. Weight and limited functionality constituted rejection reasons for a prosthesis. Children and adolescents who had accepted that they were different no longer needed the prosthesis to avoid being stared at. The majority of participants highly valued the peer-to-peer contact provided by the healthcare professionals. Conclusions For children and adolescents with UCBED, prostheses appeared particularly important for social integration, but much less so for functionality. Peer-to-peer contact seemed to provide support during the process of achieving social integration and should be embedded in the healthcare process.

[1]  Alexander W Dromerick,et al.  Characterization of compensatory trunk movements during prosthetic upper limb reaching tasks. , 2012, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  Wim G. M. Janssen,et al.  Activity and participation of children and adolescents with unilateral congenital below elbow deficiency: an online focus group study. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[3]  Raoul M Bongers,et al.  Intermanual Transfer in Training With an Upper-Limb Myoelectric Prosthesis Simulator: A Mechanistic, Randomized, Pretest-Posttest Study , 2012, Physical Therapy.

[4]  K. Dent,et al.  Parental Needs among Children with Birth Defects: Defining a Parent-to-Parent Support Network , 2012, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[5]  Wim G. M. Janssen,et al.  Mixed Feelings of Children and Adolescents with Unilateral Congenital Below Elbow Deficiency: An Online Focus Group Study , 2012, PloS one.

[6]  C. Jang,et al.  A Survey on Activities of Daily Living and Occupations of Upper Extremity Amputees , 2011, Annals of rehabilitation medicine.

[7]  S. Ritchie,et al.  Perceptions of cosmesis and function in adults with upper limb prostheses: a systematic literature review , 2011, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[8]  M. Gissler,et al.  Congenital upper limb deficiencies and associated malformations in Finland: a population-based study. , 2011, The Journal of hand surgery.

[9]  Marianne Arner,et al.  Epidemiology of congenital upper limb anomalies in 562 children born in 1997 to 2007: a total population study from stockholm, sweden. , 2010, The Journal of hand surgery.

[10]  Corry K van der Sluis,et al.  Age at First Prosthetic Fitting and Later Functional Outcome in Children and Young Adults with Unilateral Congenital Below-Elbow Deficiency: A Cross-Sectional Study , 2010, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[11]  L. Hermansson,et al.  Experiences of Swedish children with disabilities: activities and social support in daily life , 2010, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.

[12]  F. Molitor,et al.  Comparison of self-reports and parent proxy-reports of function and quality of life of children with below-the-elbow deficiency. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  L. Ping,et al.  Online discussion boards for focus group interviews: an exploratory study , 2009 .

[14]  Sandra van Dulmen,et al.  Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology , 2009, BMC medical research methodology.

[15]  C. Murray,et al.  Being like everybody else: the personal meanings of being a prosthesis user , 2009, Disability and rehabilitation.

[16]  H. Stam,et al.  Transition to adulthood: validation of the Rotterdam Transition Profile for young adults with cerebral palsy and normal intelligence , 2009, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[17]  P. Gill,et al.  Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups , 2008, BDJ.

[18]  D. Datta,et al.  The experience of men using an upper limb prosthesis following amputation: Positive coping and minimizing feeling different , 2008, Disability and rehabilitation.

[19]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Multivariate prediction of upper limb prosthesis acceptance or rejection , 2008, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[20]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Upper-Limb Prosthetics: Critical Factors in Device Abandonment , 2007, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[21]  S. van Dulmen,et al.  Young patients', parents', and survivors' communication preferences in paediatric oncology: Results of online focus groups , 2007, BMC pediatrics.

[22]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[23]  H. Stam,et al.  Evaluation of arm and prosthetic functioning in children with a congenital transverse reduction deficiency of the upper limb. , 2007, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[24]  A. Bagley,et al.  Reasons for Prosthetic Rejection by Children With Unilateral Congenital Transverse Forearm Total Deficiency , 2007 .

[25]  Tom Chau,et al.  The roles of predisposing characteristics, established need, and enabling resources on upper extremity prosthesis use and abandonment , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[26]  F. Molitor,et al.  Impact of prostheses on function and quality of life for children with unilateral congenital below-the-elbow deficiency. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[27]  C. K. van der Sluis,et al.  Prescription of the First Prosthesis and Later use in Children with Congenital Unilateral Upper Limb Deficiency: A Systematic Review , 2006, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[28]  L. C. Meyer,et al.  Prosthetic management of children with unilateral congenital below-elbow deficiency. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[29]  E. Mackenzie,et al.  Environmental barriers experienced by amputees: the Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors-Short Form. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[30]  Mark Huang,et al.  Limb deficiency and prosthetic management. 1. Decision making in prosthetic prescription and management. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[31]  R. Endacott,et al.  Clinical research 3: sample selection. , 2005, Intensive & critical care nursing.

[32]  D. Datta,et al.  Functional outcome of patients with proximal upper limb deficiency–acquired and congenital , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[33]  K. Hergenrather,et al.  Collecting behavioural data using the world wide web: considerations for researchers , 2003, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[34]  M. Breedijk,et al.  Prosthetic management of children in the Netherlands with upper limb deficiencies , 2001, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[35]  C. Bower,et al.  The incidence and epidemiology of congenital upper limb anomalies: a total population study. , 2001, The Journal of hand surgery.

[36]  W H Isbister,et al.  Qualitative research in health care , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[37]  J. van Limbeek,et al.  Prosthesis rejection in children with a unilateral congenital arm defect , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[38]  C. Fraser,et al.  An evaluation of the use made of cosmetic and functional prostheses by unilateral upper limb amputees , 1998, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[39]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  On‐line focus groups: conceptual issues and a research tool , 1998 .

[40]  Ted J. Gaiser.  Conducting On-Line Focus Groups , 1997 .

[41]  S. Jain.  Rehabilitation in limb deficiency. 2. The pediatric amputee. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[42]  D. Atkins,et al.  Epidemiologic Overview of Individuals with Upper-Limb Loss and Their Reported Research Priorities , 1996 .

[43]  C Marincek,et al.  Upper limb prosthetic use in Slovenia , 1994, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[44]  A. Hartz,et al.  Patient-centered care. Designing and delivering quality rehab services means placing patient needs over those of providers. , 1994, Rehab management.

[45]  D. Silcox,et al.  Myoelectric prostheses. A long-term follow-up and a study of the use of alternate prostheses. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[46]  G. Kejlaa,et al.  Consumer concerns and the functional value of prostheses to upper limb amputees , 1993, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[47]  D E Krebs,et al.  Prosthetic management of children with limb deficiencies. , 1991, Physical therapy.

[48]  B Curran,et al.  The prosthetic treatment of upper limb deficiency , 1991, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[49]  E. Schor.  Use of health care services by children and diagnoses received during presumably stressful life transitions. , 1986, Pediatrics.

[50]  C. K. van der Sluis,et al.  Use and functioning of the affected limb in children with unilateral congenital below-elbow deficiency during infancy and preschool age: a longitudinal observational multiple case study. , 2013, Early human development.

[51]  Maria Jirwe,et al.  Analysing qualitative data. , 2011, Nurse researcher.

[52]  Mark A Holowka,et al.  Adaptive upper extremity prostheses for recreation and play. , 2009, Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine.

[53]  J. Davidson.  A survey of the satisfaction of upper limb amputees with their prostheses, their lifestyles, and their abilities. , 2002, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[54]  S. Ziebland,et al.  QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN HEALTH CARE: ANALYZING QUALITATIVE DATA , 2000 .

[55]  R. Gutman.  Providers? , 1992, JAMA.