Imaging intervertebral disc degeneration.

Magnetic resonance imaging provides excellent anatomic detail of spinal tissues, but fails to provide the type of information that permits a definitive diagnosis in many patients with back pain. New imaging strategies that can be applied to the study of intervertebral disc degeneration include diffusion-weighted imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, functional magnetic resonance imaging, dynamic computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, and T2 relaxometry. With dynamic imaging, the relative motions of normal and degenerated lumbar motion segments can be evaluated noninvasively. With further evaluation of the technique, hypermobile segments may be distinguishable from those with normal relative motion. T2 measurements obtained by T2 relaxometry appear to have important advantages with regard to spinal imaging because this modality provides a continuous and objective measure of the content of free water in the disc, which decreases with aging and degeneration. Anatomic imaging of the spine is highly accurate in the evaluation of nonmechanical causes of back pain and less beneficial in the evaluation of back pain that is due to mechanical causes. The development of functional imaging strategies of the spine will likely improve the management of patients with back pain. This article outlines the current magnetic resonance imaging protocols for intervertebral disc degeneration, indicates deficiencies in current imaging, and describes functional imaging strategies for the spine that will likely improve the evaluation of patients with back pain. It also reviews recent published articles on magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomographic imaging of the spine and details the results of studies that have explored the future potential of spine imaging.

[1]  Scott Wiese,et al.  Accuracy of an Automated Method to Measure Rotations of Vertebrae From Computerized Tomography Data , 2005, Spine.

[2]  S. Rajasekaran,et al.  ISSLS Prize Winner: A Study of Diffusion in Human Lumbar Discs: A Serial Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study Documenting the Influence of the Endplate on Diffusion in Normal and Degenerate Discs , 2004, Spine.

[3]  D. Weishaupt,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the weight-bearing spine. , 2003, Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology.

[4]  S. Blease,et al.  Axial loaded MRI of the lumbar spine. , 2003, Clinical Radiology.

[5]  Baxter P Rogers,et al.  Application of image registration to measurement of intervertebral rotation in the lumbar spine , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Jeffrey Jarvik,et al.  Diagnostic Evaluation of Low Back Pain with Emphasis on Imaging , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  V. Haughton,et al.  Measuring the axial rotation of lumbar vertebrae in vivo with MR imaging. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[8]  A. Sakamoto,et al.  The validity of upright myelography for diagnosing lumbar disc herniation , 2002, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[9]  O. Tervonen,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficients and T2 relaxation time measurements to evaluate disc degeneration: A quantitative MR study of young patients with previous vertebral fracture , 2001 .

[10]  M. Segal,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurement of Relaxation and Water Diffusion in the Human Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Under Compression In Vitro , 2001, Spine.

[11]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Classification of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration , 2001, Spine.

[12]  C. S. Lin,et al.  Potential value of vertebral proton MR spectroscopy in determining bone weakness. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[13]  V. Haughton,et al.  Morphologic Changes in the Lumbar Intervertebral Foramen Due to Flexion-Extension, Lateral Bending, and Axial Rotation: An In Vitro Anatomic and Biomechanical Study , 2001, Spine.

[14]  R. Wolf,et al.  Upright, Weight-Bearing, Dynamic-Kinetic MRI of the Spine pMRI/kMRI , 2001, JBR-BTR : organe de la Societe royale belge de radiologie (SRBR) = orgaan van de Koninklijke Belgische Vereniging voor Radiologie.

[15]  D. Fardon,et al.  Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology. Recommendations of the Combined task Forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology. , 2001, Spine.

[16]  C. S. Lin,et al.  2D CSI proton MR spectroscopy of human spinal vertebra: Feasibility studies , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  E. Hsu,et al.  Diffusion tensor microscopy of the intervertebral disc anulus fibrosus , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  V. Haughton,et al.  Measuring diffusion of solutes into intervertebral disks with MR imaging and paramagnetic contrast medium. , 1998, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[19]  T. Hansson,et al.  Dynamic Effects on the Lumbar Spinal Canal: Axially Loaded CT‐Myelography and MRI in Patients With Sciatica and/or Neurogenic Claudication , 1997, Spine.

[20]  L. Riley,et al.  Effect of Molecular Weight on the Diffusion of Contrast Media Into Cartilage , 1997, Spine.

[21]  L. Riley,et al.  Effect of degeneration of the intervertebral disk on the process of diffusion. , 1997, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[22]  V. Haughton,et al.  Diffusion into human intervertebral disks studied with MR and gadoteridol. , 1997, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[23]  V. Haughton,et al.  Effect of disk maturation on diffusion of low-molecular-weight gadolinium complexes: an experimental study in rabbits. , 1995, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[24]  N. Obuchowski,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain , 2017, AL-QADISIYAH MEDICAL JOURNAL.

[25]  C. Boesch,et al.  Quantitative MR imaging of lumbar intervertebral disks and vertebral bodies: influence of diurnal water content variations. , 1993, Radiology.

[26]  A Ratcliffe,et al.  Correlating magnetic resonance imaging with the biochemical content of the normal human intervertebral disc , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[27]  J. P. Thompson,et al.  Preliminary Evaluation of a Scheme for Grading the Gross Morphology of the Human Intervertebral Disc , 1990, Spine.

[28]  J. Urban,et al.  Swelling Pressure of the Lumbar Intervertebral Discs: Influence of Age, Spinal Level, Composition, and Degeneration , 1988, Spine.

[29]  B. Flannigan,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Disc Degeneration: Correlation with Discography , 1987, Spine.

[30]  I Isherwood,et al.  MR imaging of the intervertebral disc: a quantitative study. , 1985, The British journal of radiology.

[31]  D. B. Lucas,et al.  An in vivo study of the axial rotation of the human thoracolumbar spine. , 1967, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[32]  W. Backes,et al.  Functional MRI of the spinal cord: will it solve the puzzle of pain? , 2003, JBR-BTR : organe de la Societe royale belge de radiologie (SRBR) = orgaan van de Koninklijke Belgische Vereniging voor Radiologie.

[33]  P W Stroman,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human cervical spinal cord with stimulation of different sensory dermatomes. , 2002, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[34]  C. Boesch,et al.  Quantitative MR imaging of lumbar intervertebral disc and vertebral bodies: methodology, reproducibility, and preliminary results. , 1994, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[35]  D. J. Prendergast,et al.  Quantitative analysis of intervertebral disc structure. , 1986, Acta radiologica. Supplementum.