A Molecular View of Powerful and Powerless Speech Styles.

Two studies are reported. The first study examined the extent to which seven forms of language were perceived as powerful and effective when used by an interviewee in a hypothetical job interview. Results suggested a five‐level model of linguistic power and effectiveness, which is independent of communicator sex. The second study examined the same seven linguistic features but in this case two dissimilar intentions were attributed to the interviewee: desire to appear sociable versus desire to appear authoritative. Results indicated that power of style interacted with communicator intention, qualifying to an extent the five‐level model suggested by Study 7. Again, effects were independent of communicator sex. Results of both studies showed that respondents made rather fine discriminations among powerful and powerless language forms, that these discriminations were quite stable, and that some ostensibly powerless forms were judged to be relatively powerful in fact.

[1]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[2]  Anthony Conway,et al.  Accent and lexical diversity as determinants of impression formation and perceived employment suitability , 1981 .

[3]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[4]  James J. Bradac,et al.  Two studies of the effects of linguistic diversity upon judgments of communicator attributes and message effectiveness , 1976 .

[5]  A. Mulac,et al.  Attributional Consequences of Powerful and Powerless Speech Styles in a Crisis-Intervention Context , 1984 .

[6]  W. O'barr.  Linguistic Evidence: Language, Power, and Strategy in the Courtroom , 1982 .

[7]  Sally Jackson,et al.  GENERALIZING ABOUT MESSAGES: SUGGESTIONS FOR DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTS , 1983 .

[8]  James J. Bradac,et al.  Language style on trial: Effects of “powerful” and “powerless” speech upon judgments of victims and villains , 1981 .

[9]  H. H. Clark.  The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. , 1973 .

[10]  J. Bradac,et al.  Verbal behavior of interviewees: the effects of several situational variables on verbal productivity, disfluency, and lexical diversity. , 1976, Journal of communication disorders.

[11]  H. Giles,et al.  Speech style and social evaluation , 1975 .

[12]  J. W. Wright,et al.  Language style and sex bias in the courtroom: The effects of male and female use of hedges and intensifiers on impression information , 1983 .

[13]  G. Miller,et al.  The effect of variations in Nonfluency on audience ratings of source credibility , 1964 .

[14]  R. Lakoff.  Language and woman's place , 1973, Language in Society.

[15]  E. Ryan,et al.  Attitudes Toward Younger and Older Adult Speakers: Effects of Varying Speech Rates , 1982 .

[16]  William M. O'Barr,et al.  Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of “powerful” and “powerless” speech , 1978 .

[17]  An Empirical Test of the Gender-Linked Language Effect in a Public Speaking Setting , 1982 .

[18]  C. Bulik,et al.  Evaluations of Middle Class and Lower Class Speakers of Standard American and German-Accented English , 1982 .

[19]  R. Baumeister.  A SELF-PRESENTATIONAL VIEW OF SOCIAL PHENOMENA , 1982 .

[20]  A. Mulac.  Effects of obscene language upon three dimensions of listener attitude , 1976 .

[21]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Effects of speech style and sex of speaker on person perception. , 1979 .

[22]  J. Bradac,et al.  On the neglected side of linguistic science: multivariate studies of sentence judgment , 1980 .

[23]  James J. Bradac,et al.  On Generalizing Cabbages, Messages, Kings, and Several Other Things: The Virtues of Multiplicity , 1983 .

[24]  J. Bowers.  Language intensity, social introversion, and attitude change , 1963 .

[25]  C. Berger,et al.  Language and social knowledge: Uncertainty in interpersonal relations , 1982 .

[26]  A. Mulac,et al.  Differences in perceptions created by syntactic‐semantic productions of male and female speakers , 1980 .