A Scenario for Portfolio-based Accreditation of Teachers' Competences in Estonian Context

This paper focuses on the process of accreditation of in-service teachers’ competences, which is used in some countries as career advancement option within profession. The accreditation process of senior teachers in Estonia is somewhat different compared with other countries, as the next career rank can be granted to an applicant only if she/he meets a number of formal measurable indicators. The higher career rank is valid just for five years, then it has to be re-applied or else teacher falls back to previous rank and salary level. We argue that current accreditation process does not support teachers’ lifelong learning and knowledge building activities and does not make use of new technology (e.g. e-portfolio). Empirical study was conducted using participatory design method involving in-service teachers. The first iteration of design-based research process resulted with an alternative scenario for competence-based accreditation process involving use of digital portfolio. The paper also provides a conceptual model for learning and knowledge building with eportfolio to support the new scenario of teachers’ accreditation process.

[1]  L. Ingvarson,et al.  Teacher Education Accreditation : A Review of National and International Trends and Practices , 2006 .

[2]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[3]  Kai Pata,et al.  A Participatory Design Approach for the Support of Collaborative Learning and Knowledge Building in Networked Organizations , 2009, Int. J. Adv. Corp. Learn..

[4]  Teemu Leinonen,et al.  Information Architecture and Design Solutions Scaffolding Authoring of Open Educational Resources , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[5]  G. Barkdoll,et al.  "Evaluating the Evaluators" , 1978, Evaluation & the health professions.

[6]  E. Krull Teacher Professional Development in Estonia: Theory and practice , 2001 .

[7]  Kenneth M. Zeichner,et al.  The teaching portfolio in US teacher education programs: what we know and what we need to know , 2001 .

[8]  B. Kehm,et al.  The European University: A Handbook on Institutional Approaches to Strategic Management, Quality Management, European Policy and Recognition , 2000 .

[9]  A. Wise Establishing Teaching as a Profession , 2005 .

[10]  Ingrid Helleve,et al.  Theoretical Foundations of Teachers' Professional Development , 2010 .

[11]  Stephen Gourlay,et al.  The SECI model of knowledge creation: some empirical shortcomings , 2003 .

[12]  Diana L. Owens,et al.  Court rulings favor performance measures , 2001 .

[13]  Kai Pata,et al.  Supporting Cross-Institutional Knowledge-Building with Web 2.0 Enhanced Digital Portfolios , 2008, 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[14]  M. F. van der Schaaf,et al.  Construct validation of teacher portfolio assessment. Procedures for improving teacher competence assessment illustrated by teaching students research skills , 1998 .

[15]  Miltiadis D. Lytras,et al.  A modelling approach to study learning processes with a focus on knowledge creation , 2008 .

[16]  A. Hargreaves Four Ages of Professionalism and Professional Learning , 2000 .

[17]  L. Spencer,et al.  Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research , 2002 .

[18]  Helen C. Barrett,et al.  Balancing the Two Faces of ePortfolios , 2010 .

[19]  K. Wolf,et al.  Teaching Portfolios: Purposes and Possibilities. , 1998 .

[20]  Rob Poell,et al.  Learning strategies of workers in the knowledge-creating company , 2003 .

[21]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Participatory Design: The Third Space in Human– Computer Interaction , 2012 .

[22]  Demetrios G. Sampson,et al.  Competence Models in Technology-Enhanced Competence-Based Learning , 2008 .