User Participation in Contemporary IS Development: an IS management perspective

User participation in IS development has become an established practice perceived to improve both the development process and its outcomes. Recently, however, Markus and Mao (2004) have highlighted the need to revisit user participation in light of the changing IS development environment. A survey of New Zealand organisations with 200 or more full-time employees was undertaken in order to obtain an updated assessment of the actual practice of user participation in IS development projects. The results suggest that user participation continues to be a dominant aspect of IS development. The paper provides empirical data on the common reasons for having users participate and the form and types of user activities in development. The responding organisations perceived user participation to be beneficial to IS development in their recent IS projects, and many intended continuing or increasing their current levels of user participation in the future.

[1]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Participation in Development and Implementation - Updating An Old, Tired Concept for Today's IS Contexts , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Angèle L. M. Cavaye,et al.  User participation in system development revisited , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[3]  P. Chisnall Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[4]  Stephen G. MacDonell,et al.  IS Development Practice in New Zealand Organisations , 2009, J. Res. Pract. Inf. Technol..

[5]  Kevin Cheng,et al.  Who owns it? , 2005, INTR.

[6]  J.S. Reel,et al.  Critical Success Factors in Software Projects , 1999, IEEE Softw..

[7]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION OF THE INFORMATION SYSTEMSDEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT: THE NATURE OFDEVELOPMENT LIFE CYCLES AND THEUSE OF METHODS , 2002 .

[8]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  A market-based perspective on information systems development , 2001, CACM.

[9]  Paul Beynon-Davies,et al.  Information systems prototyping in practice , 1999, J. Inf. Technol..

[10]  Thomas Butler,et al.  An institutional perspective on developing and implementing intranet‐ and internet‐based information systems , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[11]  Andrew Martin,et al.  A model of information systems development project performance , 2000, Inf. Syst. J..

[12]  Michael Lang,et al.  A comparison of 'traditional' and multimedia information systems development practices , 2003, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[13]  P. Lin Strategic spin-offs , 2001 .

[14]  Enid Mumford,et al.  The reality of participative systems design: contributing to stability in a rocking boat , 1997, Inf. Syst. J..

[15]  Dane K. Peterson,et al.  A Comparison of the Perceived Importance of Information Systems Development Strategies by Developers from the United States and Korea , 2003, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[16]  David Graham Wastell,et al.  An information system profile of the UK manufacturing sector , 1995, J. Inf. Technol..

[17]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  The Relationship Between User Participation and User Satisfaction: An Investigation of Four Contingency Factors , 1994, MIS Q..

[18]  Adenubi Jo The criteria for success in endodontics. , 1978 .

[19]  Blake Ives,et al.  User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research , 1984 .

[20]  Henri Barki,et al.  Communication as a dimension of user participation , 2001 .

[21]  Michael Frese,et al.  Don't underestimate the problems of user centredness in software development projectsthere are many! , 1996, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[22]  Gregory D. Schumacher,et al.  IEEE Guide for Developing System Requirements Specifications , 1999 .

[23]  James J. Jiang,et al.  The Importance of Building a Foundation for User Involvement in Information System Projects , 2002 .

[24]  Barbara Wixom,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Affecting Data Warehousing Success , 2001, MIS Q..

[25]  Judy L. Wynekoop,et al.  Studying system development methodologies: an examination of research methods , 1997, Inf. Syst. J..

[26]  Netta Iivari,et al.  Enculturation of user involvement in software development organizations - an interpretive case study in the product development context , 2004, NordiCHI '04.

[27]  D. Dillman Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[28]  Cynthia Mathis Beath,et al.  The enactments and consequences of token, shared, and compliant participation in information systems development , 1996 .

[29]  Hsi-Peng Lu,et al.  The relationships between management styles, user participation, and system success over MIS growth stages , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[30]  Neil F. Doherty,et al.  Institutional Repository The impact of inadequacies in the treatment of organizational issues on information systems development projects , 2018 .

[31]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  Rethinking Management Information Systems: An Interdisciplinary Perspective , 1999 .

[32]  Sari Kujala,et al.  User involvement: A review of the benefits and challenges , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[33]  Benjamin B. M. Shao,et al.  The relationship between user participation and system success: a simultaneous contingency approach , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[34]  Elizabeth J. Davidson Joint application design (JAD) in practice , 1999, J. Syst. Softw..

[35]  A. McMeekin,et al.  Tools of the Trade – Trade of the Tools , 2007 .

[36]  Neil F. Doherty,et al.  An investigation of the factors affecting the successful treatment of organisational issues in systems development projects , 2001, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  User participation in decision support systems development: Influencing system outcomes , 2004, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Henri Barki,et al.  Rethinking the Concept of User Involvement , 1989, MIS Q..

[39]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  An Integrative Contingency Model of Software Project Risk Management , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[40]  T.C. Lethbridge,et al.  Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK) and the Software Engineering Education Knowledge (SEEK) - a preliminary mapping , 2001, 10th International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice.

[41]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Successful Strategies for User Participation in Systems Development , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[42]  Michael Newman,et al.  User Involvement as an Interaction Process: A Case Study , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[43]  Frada Burstein,et al.  Australian Journal of Information Systems , 2001 .

[44]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Unpacking the systems development process: an empirical application of the CSF concept in a research context , 1999, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[45]  Erran Carmel,et al.  PD and joint application design: a transatlantic comparison , 1993, CACM.

[46]  S. T. Foster,et al.  User involvement during information systems development: a comparison of analyst and user perceptions of system acceptance , 1999 .

[47]  Mo Adam Mahmood,et al.  Variables affecting information technology end-user satisfaction: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[48]  Joe Nandhakumar,et al.  Designing in the dark: the changing user-developer relationship in information systems development , 1997, ICIS '97.

[49]  Cynthia Mathis Beath,et al.  The Contradictory Structure of Systems Development Methodologies: Deconstructing the IS-User Relationship in Information Engineering , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[50]  J Price,et al.  Computer Systems Development , 1991, The Journal for hospital admitting management : official publication of the National Association of Hospital Admitting Managers.

[51]  Naveed Saleem,et al.  An Empirical Test of the Contingency Approach to User Participation in Information Systems Development , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[52]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Constructing identity and participation during technological change , 2005 .

[53]  Enid Mumford,et al.  A Socio-Technical Approach to Systems Design , 2000, Requirements Engineering.

[54]  Mark Keil,et al.  The user–developer communication process: a critical case study , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[55]  Guy Fitzgerald,et al.  Research notes: Information systems development, maintenance and enhancement: findings from a UK study , 1999 .

[56]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Identifying Software Project Risks: An International Delphi Study , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[57]  Henri Barki,et al.  Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use , 1994 .

[58]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Exploring the Factors Associated with Expert Systems Success , 1995, MIS Q..

[59]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Information technology: a study of performance and the role of human and organizational factors , 1997 .

[60]  Tom Butler,et al.  The Relationship Between User Participation and the Management of Change Surrounding the Development of Information Systems: A European Perspective , 2001, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[61]  Bruce Cheek,et al.  Does user involvement during information systems development improve data quality , 1998 .

[62]  Henri Barki,et al.  User Participation, Conflict, and Conflict Resolution: The Mediating Roles of Influence , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[63]  Tom Butler,et al.  The institutionalisation of user participation for systems development in Telecom Éireann , 1999 .

[64]  D. Dillman Mail and internet surveys , 1999 .

[65]  Peter Johnson,et al.  Helping and hindering user involvement — a tale of everyday design , 1997, CHI.

[66]  Leela Damodaran,et al.  User involvement in the systems design process-a practical guide for users , 1996, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[67]  Michael Newman,et al.  Information system design, stress and organisational change in the ambulance services: A tale of two cities , 1996 .

[68]  Adel M. Aladwani IS Project Characteristics and Performance: A Kuwaiti Illustration , 2000, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[69]  Netta Iivari Exploring the Rhetoric on Representing the User: Discourses on User Involvement in Software Development , 2004, ICIS.

[70]  Mark I. Hwang,et al.  The effect of user engagement on system success: A meta-analytical integration of research findings , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[71]  James E. Hunton,et al.  Effects of User Participation in Systems Development: A Longitudinal Field Experiment , 1997, MIS Q..

[72]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Research on information systems development in Scandinavia—unity in plurality , 1998 .

[73]  Carl Martin Allwood,et al.  Computer consultants' views of user participation in the system development process , 1999 .

[74]  D. Knights,et al.  Managers Divided: Organisation Politics and Information Technology Management , 1995 .

[75]  Andrew Clement,et al.  A retrospective look at PD projects , 1993, CACM.

[76]  Debra Howcroft,et al.  Paradoxes of participatory practices: the Janus role of the systems developer , 2003, Inf. Organ..

[77]  J. R. G. Wood,et al.  A further exploration into information systems development: the evolution of Multiview2 , 1998, Inf. Technol. People.

[78]  N F Doherty,et al.  Factors affecting the level of success of community information systems. , 1999, Journal of management in medicine.

[79]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Reconciling user and project manager perceptions of IT project risk: a Delphi study 1 , 2002, Inf. Syst. J..

[80]  Cem Canel,et al.  The successful development of information systems for FMS: some useful lessons , 1997 .

[81]  Kwasi Amoako-Gyampah,et al.  When Is User Involvement Not User Involvement , 1997 .

[82]  P. Asaro Transforming society by transforming technology: the science and politics of participatory design , 2000 .

[83]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  De-escalation of commitment to information systems projects: a process perspective , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[84]  Russell L. Purvis,et al.  Perceptions on Stakeholder Involvement in the Implementation of System Development Methodologies , 2000 .

[85]  Jan Stage,et al.  Controlling Prototype Development Through Risk Analysis , 1996, MIS Q..

[86]  Melanie Wilson,et al.  Participation: 'Bounded Freedom' or Hidden Constraints on User Involvement , 2003 .

[87]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Assessing Expert Systems Impact on Users' Jobs , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[88]  BarkiHenri,et al.  Measuring user participation, user involvement, and user attitude , 1994 .

[89]  Gerald M. Weinberg,et al.  Computer Systems Development: History Organization and Implementation , 1991 .

[90]  Gary S. C. Pan Information systems project abandonment: a stakeholder analysis , 2005, Int. J. Inf. Manag..