BACKGROUND
Predicting cardiac valve size from noncardiac anatomic measurements would benefit pediatric cardiologists, adult cardiologists, and cardiac surgeons in a number of decision-making situations. Previous studies correlating valve size with body size have been generated with the use of fixed autopsy specimens, angiography, and echocardiography, but primarily in the young. This study examines the relation of body surface area to measurements of the left ventricular-aortic junction (aortic valve anulus diameter) and the right ventricular-pulmonary trunk junction (pulmonary valve anulus diameter) in 6801 hearts across a wide spectrum of ages.
METHODS
From June 1985 to October 1998, cardiac valves from 6801 donated hearts were analyzed morphologically. Donor age was newborn to 59 years (mean 31 +/- 17 years; median 32 years). Calculated body surface areas ranged from 0.18 to 3.55 m(2). Aortic (n = 4636) and pulmonary valve diameters (n = 5480) were measured from enucleated valves suitable for allograft transplantation. Mean valve sizes were computed for ranges in body surface area in 0.1-m(2) increments.
RESULTS
For adult men (age >/= 17 years), the mean aortic valve diameter was 23.1 +/- 2.0 mm (n = 2214) and the mean pulmonary valve diameter was 26.2 +/- 2.3 mm (n = 2589). For adult women, the mean aortic valve diameter was 21.0 +/- 1.8 mm (n = 1156) and the mean pulmonary valve diameter was 23.9 +/- 2.2 mm (n = 1408). The mean indexed aortic valve area was 2.02 +/- 0.52 cm(2)/m(2) and the pulmonary valve area 2.65 +/- 0.52 cm(2)/m(2). Between 82% and 85% of the variability was explained by the size of the patient. Regression equations were developed both overall and separately for men and women, although the additional contribution of sex above that of body size was less than 1%.
CONCLUSIONS
Aortic and pulmonary valve diameters are closely related to body size. Thus, body surface area, when used in conjunction with other clinically accepted evaluations, is a useful tool for estimating normal aortic and pulmonary valve size.
[1]
L. J. Krovetz,et al.
Age-related changes in size of the aortic valve annulus in man.
,
1975,
American heart journal.
[2]
W. Edwards,et al.
Age-related changes in normal human hearts during the first 10 decades of life. Part I (Growth): A quantitative anatomic study of 200 specimens from subjects from birth to 19 years old.
,
1988,
Mayo Clinic proceedings.
[3]
S Westaby,et al.
Adult human valve dimensions and their surgical significance.
,
1984,
The American journal of cardiology.
[4]
Richard A. Hopkins,et al.
Cardiac Reconstructions with Allograft Valves
,
1989,
Springer New York.
[5]
G. Schwartz,et al.
Geometric method for measuring body surface area: a height-weight formula validated in infants, children, and adults.
,
1978,
The Journal of pediatrics.
[6]
M. Lev,et al.
The Quantitative Anatomy of the Normal Child's Heart
,
1963
.
[7]
R. Devereux,et al.
Two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in normal children and adults.
,
1989,
The American journal of cardiology.
[8]
G. Sholler,et al.
Echocardiographic assessment of aortic root dimensions in normal children based on measurement of a new ratio of aortic size independent of growth.
,
1995,
American Journal of Cardiology.
[9]
S. Lemaire,et al.
Aortic diameter as a function of age, gender, and body surface area.
,
1993,
Surgery.
[10]
Stanton A. Glantz,et al.
Primer of biostatistics : statistical software program version 6.0
,
1981
.
[11]
W. Edwards,et al.
Age-related changes in normal human hearts during the first 10 decades of life. Part II (Maturity): A quantitative anatomic study of 765 specimens from subjects 20 to 99 years old.
,
1988,
Mayo Clinic proceedings.
[12]
D. Levy,et al.
Determinants of echocardiographic aortic root size. The Framingham Heart Study.
,
1995,
Circulation.